Equality - Judgment Search Results

Adarand Constructors, Inc. Vs. Peandntilde;a

Court: US Supreme Court

..... officials claiming that the race based presumptions used in subcontractor compensation clauses violate the equal protection component of the fifth amendment s due process clause the district court ..... as indistinguishable one commentator observed that i n case after case fifth amendment equal protection problems are discussed on the assumption that fourteenth amendment precedents are controlling karst .....

Miller Vs. Johnson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... senate adopted redistricting guidelines which among other things required single member districts of equal population contiguous geography nondilution of minority voting strength fidelity to precinct lines ..... definition involves racial considerations underlying their argument are the very stereotypical assumptions the equal protection clause forbids it is true that redistricting in most cases will .....

Fulton Corp. Vs. Faulkner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rationale consistent with our conclusion that the compensatory tax doctrine is fundamentally concerned with equalizing competition between in staters and out of staters indeed we cited hinson in support ..... or to the extent consistent with other constitutional provisions notably due process retroactively impose equal burdens on the tax s former beneficiaries a state may also combine these two .....

Rakesh Kumar Singla Vs. State of Haryana Through Financial Commissione ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1995)111PLR411

..... admissible after 8 years of regular service the division bench invoked the principle of equal pay for equal work and held that since the petitioner had completed eight years of service without ..... or consistent their lordships also observed that since the benefit of the principle of equal pay for equal work has already been extended to even ad hoc employees casual labour temporary employees .....

Dr. Rajesh Garg and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1995)111PLR450

..... merit must be the test when choosing the best according to this rule of equal chance for equal marks this propositions has greater importance when we reach the higher levels of education ..... requirement within the state or on institutional preference but having regard to broader considerations of equality of opportunity and institutional continuity in education which has its own importance and value we .....

Lic of India and anr. Vs. Consumer Education and Research Center and o ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC1811; [1995]84CompCas168(SC); (1996)2GLR83; JT1995(4)SC366; 1995(3)SCALE627; (1995)5SCC482; [1995]Supp1SCR349; 1995(2)LC442(SC)

..... this principle however will not apply where the bargaining power of contracting parties is equal or almost equal this principle may not apply where both parties are businessmen and the con ..... would inevitably would result in substitution of the doctrine of classification to the doctrine of equality and necessary that relevant considerations are i taken into account and the irrelevant consideration .....

Bhupinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1995)111PLR387

..... of geographical or historical background the state cannot be permitted to infringe the right of equality enshrined in article 14 of the constitution persons similarly situated cannot be permitted to be ..... the law makes a distinction between persons who are similarly placed a law providing for equal treatment of unequal objects transactions or persons would be condemned as discriminatory if there is .....

Manvendra Shah, Member of Parliament Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1996All92; (1995)2UPLBEC1060

..... sections from the backward classes the special benefits would amount to treating equals unequally violating the equality provisions of the constitution secondly to rank them with the rest of ..... whether reservation under the constitution is understood as a concept of mitigating inequalities competing equalities or compensatory discrimination as theory put into practise it does not and cannot operate .....

Rosenberger Vs. Rector and Visitors of Univ. of VA.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... expressive marketplace that includes some 15 student publications with predictably divergent viewpoints it is equally clear that petitioners viewpoint is religious and that publication of wide awake is a ..... out religious entities for special benefits see ibid arguing that the assessment violated the equality principle by subjecting some to peculiar burdens and by granting to others peculiar exemptions .....

Morse Vs. Republican Party of VA.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... voting qualification or prerequisite if the political processes leading to nomination or election are not equally open to protected group members emphasis added pp 203 210 c consideration of the ..... beach communications inc 508 u s 307 314 1993 reviewing statute for rational basis under equal protection clause and noting that judicial intervention is generally unwarranted no matter how unwisely .....