Equality - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: equality Year: 1978 Page 1 of about 1,233 results (0.047 seconds)Regents of Univ. of California Vs. Bakke
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-28-1978
..... past discrimination continue to make race conscious remedial programs appropriate means for ensuring equal educational opportunity in universities deserves considerable judicial deference see e g katzenbach v ..... students are judged under these circumstances their performance and degrees must be regarded equally with the regularly admitted students with whom they compete for standing since minority .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCity of Los Angeles Vs. Manhart
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-25-1978
..... of employment the benefit is guaranteed for life footnote 4 the department contributes an amount equal to 110 of all employee contributions footnote 5 the significance of the disparity is ..... defendant s liability for contributions did not begin until april 5 1972 the day the equal employment opportunity commission issued an interpretation casting doubt on some varieties of pension fund discrimination .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHolt Civic Club Vs. City of Tuscaloosa
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-28-1978
..... effects of limited municipal powers over police jurisdiction residents from the indirect though equally dramatic extraterritorial effects of purely internal municipal actions it makes little sense to ..... of a political community underlying constitutional recognition of bona fide residency requirements appellants equal protection claim can be simply expressed the state cannot extend the franchise to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTZablocki Vs. Redhail
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-18-1978
..... states district court for the eastern district of wisconsin held the statute unconstitutional under the equal protection clause and enjoined its enforcement 418 f supp 1061 1976 we noted probable ..... the wisconsin measure in this case does not pass muster under either due process or equal protection standards appellant identifies three objectives which are supposedly furthered by the statute in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-25-1978
Reported in: AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621
..... vocation or occupation as well as of acquisition and possession of reasonable property of equality of status and of opportunity which imply absence of unreasonable or unfair discrimination between ..... principle of reasonableness which legally as well as philosophically is an essential element of equality or non arbitrariness pervades article 14 like a brooding omnipresence and the procedure .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaldwIn Vs. Fish and Game Comm'n of Montana
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-23-1978
..... must a state treat all citizens resident and nonresident equally and here equality in access to montana elk is not basic to ..... discrimination was not to be justified by popular disapproval of equal treatment id at 1012 iv privileges and immunities appellants strongly ..... by private parties indeed it acknowledges that the clause requires equality with respect to privileges bearing upon the vitality of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTElkins Vs. Moreno
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-19-1978
..... nor inescapable the university might still decide that the other considerations such as cost equalization by themselves dictate continuation of the current policy according to counsel for petitioner that ..... the lower courts on remand even if the court ultimately decides to consider respondents equal protection arguments resolution of maryland domicile law would seem irrelevant unlike the situation in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirst Nat'l Bank of Boston Vs. Bellotti
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-26-1978
..... the court adverted to the conceivable interests served by 8 only in rejecting appellants equal protection claim footnote 25 appellee nevertheless advances two principal justifications for the prohibition of ..... could be denied the protection of all constitutional guarantees including due process and the equal protection of the laws certain purely personal guarantees such as the privilege against .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDuke Power Co. Vs. Carolina Env. Study Group
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-26-1978
..... support of the due process claim in any event we conclude that there is no equal protection violation the general rationality of the price anderson act liability limitations particularly with reference ..... the private insurance market under the act the liability ceiling automatically increases to a level equal to the amount of primary and secondary deferred premium insurance coverage when the amount of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMonell Vs. Department of Soc. Svcs.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-06-1978
..... and as blair indicated municipalities as instrumentalities through which states executed their policies could be equally disabled from carrying out state policies if they were also obligated to carry out ..... the law were 1983 liability unconstitutional as to local governments it would have been equally unconstitutional as to state officers yet everyone proponents and opponents alike knew 1983 would .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial