Environment - Judgment Search Results

Vellore District Environment Monitoring Committee Rep. by Its Secretar ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025]1S.C.R.1265

varies greatly between tanneries, [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1277 Vellore District Environment Monitoring Committee Rep. by its Secretary Mr. R. Rajebdran v.

Bombay Environment Action Group and Sameer Mehta Vs. State of Maharash ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(2)ALLMR235; 2007(1)BomCR721

Board to forthwith take steps in law, including under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act,

Parisara Environment Protection Organization (r) Vs. The State Of Karn ...

Court: Karnataka

9897/2021, 15179/2021, 19027/2023, 23417/2023 Government of Karnataka Forest, Ecology and Environment Department (Ecology & Environment) Room No.704, 7th Floor, 4th Gate,

Bombay Environment Action Group and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra a ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1991Bom301; 1991(2)BomCR541; (1991)92BOMLR616

be considered if such a location is economically justified and environmentally unobjectionable.' 11. Apart from the above, we also have the

Environment Support Group and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Rep. by I ...

Court: Karnataka

denies the plebian the benefit of enjoyment of the lake environment. 4. The 1st respondent in the counter has stoutly denied

Vellore District Environment Monitoring Committee Rep. by Its Secretar ...

Court: Chennai

generated by the said industry which has resulted in the environmental degradation and suffering to the residents of the area.6. We

Centre for Environment Law, Wwf-i Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

every citizen of India to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife and to have compassion

Dahanu Taluka Environment Protection Group and anr. Vs. Bombay Suburba ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1991(2)SC1; 1991(1)SCALE472; (1991)2SCC539; 1991(1)LC578(SC)

environmental pollution. Sufficient safeguards against pollution of air, water and environment have been insisted upon in the conditions of grant However,

Environment Society of India and anr. Vs. Administrator, Chandigarh Ad ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1998P& H94; (1997)117PLR239

to show that the Administration has failed to protect the environment.20. Hither-to-fore, the Gas Stations/Petrol Pumps/Fuel Filing Stations have been sanctioned

Animal and Environment Legal Defence Fund Vs. Union of India and Other ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC1071; JT1997(3)SC298; 1997(2)SCALE493; (1997)3SCC549; [1997]2SCR728

be taken to prevent any destruction or damage to the environment, the flora and fauna and wild life in those areas.