Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: employee s compensation act 1923 chapter 1 preliminary Court: supreme court of india Page 94 of about 5,698 results (0.574 seconds)

Schlemmer Vs. Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Ry. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... as commonly understood. the difference between the two is one of degree, rather than of kind. section 8 of the automatic coupler act having exonerated the employee from assumption of risk under specified conditions, the employee's rights in that regard should not be sacrificed by charging him with assumption of risk under another name, for example, with contributory negligence ..... and appreciated, is one which many men are in the habit of assuming, and which prudent men who must earn a living are willing to assume for extra compensation, one who assumes the risk cannot be said to be guilty of contributory negligence if, having in view the risk of danger assumed, he uses care reasonably commensurate ..... been seen, the supreme court refers, did not put the decision on the fact of warning alone. on the contrary, it began with a statement that an employee takes the risk even of unusual dangers if he has notice of them and voluntarily exposes himself to them. then it went on to say that the deceased .....

United States Vs. Butler

Court : US Supreme Court

..... supervise the process which it undertakes to aid. it may spend its money for the suppression of the boll weevil, but may page 297 u. s. 86 not compensate the farmers for suspending the growth of cotton in the infected areas. it may aid state reforestation and forest fire prevention agencies, 43 stat. 653 ..... of cash payments at specified times, the advantage would lie with curtailment of production plus compensation, rather than with the same or increased acreage plus the expected rise in prices which actually occurred. although the agricultural adjustment act was put into operation in june, 1933, the official reports of the department of agriculture ..... in aid of agriculture falls within it. wholly apart from that question, another principle embedded in our constitution prohibits the enforcement of the agricultural adjustment act. the act invades the reserved rights of the states. it is a statutory plan to regulate and control agricultural production, a matter beyond the powers delegated to .....

Communist Party Vs. Sacb

Court : US Supreme Court

..... organization, as that term is defined in 2(5) of the national labor relations act, as amended, 29 u.s.c. 152, or to represent any employer in any matter or proceeding arising or pending under that act. 5(a)(1). it is unlawful for any officer or employee of the united states or of a defense facility, knowing or having notice that the ..... and defense facility employees to support such organizations, and withdraws from the organizations and their contributors certain tax exemptions. none of this is so lacking in consonance as to suggest a clandestine purpose behind the registration provisions. nor does the legislative history contain any such suggestion. rather, the committee reports on the bills from which the act page 367 u. s. 84 derived .....

Fpc Vs. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... x-20 transactions would establish (1) portends definite and lasting inflationary impact on gas prices generally, (2) would probably be devoted to end uses inappropriate to the act's purposes, (3) would disrupt patterns of industry growth carefully evolved during 20 years of congressionally directed regulation, and (4) would be beyond effective state regulation." " ..... the policy considerations advanced by the fpc were outside the scope of a 7 proceeding. the court relied principally on 1(b) of the natural gas act, 15 u.s.c. 717(b), which provides: "the provisions of this chapter shall apply to the transportation of natural gas in interstate commerce, to the sale ..... thereof, unless there is in force with respect to such natural gas company a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the commission authorizing such acts or operations. . . ." [ footnote 9 ] s.rep. no. 948 states that: "the bill (h.r. 5249) would require a certificate from the federal power commission to engage in .....

M.R.F. Ltd. Vs. Manohar Parrikar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... requirement is merely directory if any breach of the requirement is necessarily followed by an opportunity to exercise some judicial or official discretion in a way which can adequately compensate for that breach. provisions relating to the steps to be taken by the parties to legal proceedings (using the term in the widest sense) are often construed ..... 2002 and 4218 of 2002 are as under:1. the government of goa, in purported exercise powers conferred upon them by section 23 of the indian electricity act, 1910 (`electricity act' for short) issued a notification on 30.09.1991, granting rebate of 25% in tariff in respect of the power supply to the low tension and high ..... from the notifications dated 15.05.1996 and 01.08.1996.17. from the language of the act it becomes clear that the act is not influenced by the out come of the judgment of the high court in manohar parrikar's case. by the enactment, the legislature has imposed prohibition of further payments under the notifications, provides .....

Union of India Vs. Moolchand Khairati Ram Trust

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of medical assistance on unjust ground was held to be in violation of right to life under article 21 and the state was directed to pay the compensation of rs.25,000 to the petitioner and requisite directions were issued by this court. the state cannot avoid its constitutional 59 obligation in that regard on ..... of justice qureshi committee with respect to the institution cannot be brushed aside on the sole ground that comments recorded in justice qureshi's report were based on the statement made by disgruntled employees of the hospitals, who were in dispute with the management of the hospital.76. learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of st. ..... /petitioners have no unrestricted fundamental right to carry on business of exhibiting cinematograph films. their right to carry on business is regulated by the provisions of the act and the rules framed thereunder. these provisions are necessary to ensure public safety, public health and other allied matters. as already discussed rule 41-a has .....

Hind Offshore Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Iffco-tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of section 35(3). at the outset, therefore, it is important to note that the scheme of the 1963 act is clear inasmuch as the automatic consequence of a breach of warranty is discharge of the insurer's liability. such discharge of liability does not require any express conduct or representation from the insurer.35. it is not ..... that the said warranty constitutes an express warranty in terms of section 37 of the marine insurance act, 1963 which was breached by the appellants by not disclosing the first accident and damage to the vessel. the appellant s failure to comply with the requirements of abs rules and warranties by not reporting the accidents and damages ..... to the vessel discharge the respondent from any liability under the insurance policy as per section 35(3) of the marine insurance act, 1963. reliance has been placed in this .....

Patel Roadways Limited Vs. Birla Yamaha Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2000(3)CTC59; JT2000(3)SC618; (2000)125PLR816; 2000(2)SCALE559; (2000)4SCC91; [2000]2SCR665; 2000(2)LC887(SC)

..... the provisions regarding jurisdiction of the national commission lays down inter alia, that subject to the other provisions of the act the national commission shall have jurisdiction (a) to entertain (i) complaints where the value of the goods or services and compensation, if any, claimed exceeds rupees twenty lakhs and (ii) appeals against the orders of any state commission; and ..... an insurer i.e., he is responsible for the safety of the goods entrusted to him in all events except when loss or damage arises from act of god or king's enemies; but his liability for loss or injury in respect of the goods carried may be varied by the contract. the court further held that the ..... under circumstances such as the present is evidence of negligence, the truck with the coal-gas plant on it being under the management of the defendant no. 1's servants; and as they have not been produced to show how the fire originated and no explanation offered, the respondent has not discharged the onus cast upon him .....

Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra .

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of the residential building. sruil were not entitled to fsi on account of the setback area of 705.45 sq.m. as they had already received compensation for the said area. the question as to the height of the habitable floors about the consumption of fsi was also raised. besides, it was ..... stop work notice was issued on 16.7.2011 in respect of the construction by the corporation under section 354 of the mumbai municipal corporation act, 1888 ("mmc act"). the said notice was withdrawn on 11.11.2011.7. on 29.11.2011, the corporation issued a notice under section 51 of the ..... corporation of greater mumbai. the construction up to plinth/column up to plinth level has been completed in building no..........on/in plot no./c.s. no./ c.t.s.no.................division/village/town planning scheme no. ............road/street.................ward.......................................in accordance permission no.................dated ...............under my supervision and in accordance with the sanctioned .....

Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Anr. Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... reconsider its recommendation. if the njac affirms its earlier recommendation the president shall issue the warrant of appointment (section 7 of the njac act).471. the officers and employees of the njac shall be appointed by the central government in consultation with the njac and the convener of the njac shall be the ..... the judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office. [117]. article ii section 4. the president, vice president and all civil officers of the united ..... [193]. a.k. gopalan v. state of madras air1950sc27[194]. union of india v. sankalchand himatlal sheth & anr., (1977) 4 scc193[195]. adm jabalpur vs. s.s. shukla etc. etc. air1976sc1207[196]. laurence h. tribe (american constitutional law) second edition, page 2 of chapter 1 approaches to constitutional analysis - that all lawful power derives .....