Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: employee s compensation act 1923 chapter 1 preliminary Court: supreme court of india Page 100 of about 5,698 results (0.265 seconds)

Jun 25 1987 (FN)

Bowen Vs. Gilliard

Court : US Supreme Court

..... ] "no person shall be . . . deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." u.s.const., amdt. 5. [ footnote 10 ] the district court relied on the following paragraph of the opinion of the north carolina supreme court in goodyear v. goodyear, 257 n. ..... . the amendment at issue in this case is found in the latter division, 98 stat. 1145. as a result of that amendment, 402(a)(38) of the social security act, 42 u.s.c. 602(a)(38) (1982 ed., supp. iii) now provides, in pertinent part: "a state plan for aid and services to needy families with children must -- " " * ..... for those support obligations that are judicially imposed, for instance, require consideration of the needs of the particular child in question. see, e.g., uniform marriage and divorce act, 9a u.l.a. 309 (1979 and supp.1987) (court must consider, inter alia, "the physical and emotional condition of the child and his educational needs"). .....

Tag this Judgment!

1990

Crandon Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... petitioners. in 1986, the united states filed a civil complaint alleging that the payments had been made "to supplement each individual defendant's compensation as a federal employee" and that they "created a conflict of interest situation which induced the breach of the fiduciary duty of undivided loyalty [which] each ..... violated a provision of the criminal code that prohibits private parties from paying, and government employees from receiving, supplemental compensation for the employee's government service. [ footnote 1 ] the essential facts are not disputed. each employee resigned because he planned to accept a specific federal position. these shifts required forgoing the higher ..... 494 u. s. 159 1962. 18 u.s.c. 201-224. while some sections focus on bribes or compensation offered as a quid pro quo for government acts, and apply to persons before and after commencing government service, 209 is a prophylactic rule that aims at the source of government employees' compensation. [ footnote 9 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2019 (SC)

Delhi Dayalbagh Cooperative House Building Society Ltd. Vs. Registrar ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... any, as settled by the collector or if reference is made to the court by the final court or appeal and all compensation inclusive of all payments and allowances in respect thereof payable under the said act and all courts costs and pleaders fees etc. incurred by the state government in defending the reference, if any, made ..... has been resident in the union territory of delhi for two years or more; provided that this condition shall not apply to members of all india services and employees of the central government and the delhi administration. (c) for membership has been approved by a his written application majority of the managing committee. his age is ..... hold basis and members are allotted flats or such other premises in such buildings with a right to occupy the same in accordance with terms of lease, government's guidelines and the bye-laws of such group housing; "multi-purpose co-operative housing society" means a society formed with the object of undertaking multifarious activities for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2020 (SC)

Sri Marthanda Varma (D) Th. Lr. . Vs. State of Kerala .

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... opinion in the state was unanimous that not only should the continued payment of the existing allotments for the maintenance of devaswoms be guaranteed but that adequate compensation should also be given in respect of the properties of the devaswoms taken over by the state since 1912, and the profits derived from them. the ..... permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the 3rd and 4th defendants from forcibly obstructing the plaintiff from discharging her duties as an employee which she is carrying out for the past 20 years or from doing any act which is detrimental to the interest of the plaintiff in doing her lawful work and for which the defendants 3 ..... that followed between the heir to the throne namely, marthandavarma and his loyalists on the one side and the ettuveettil pillamars, the brahmins, and the king s son s loyalists on the other side, marthandavarma succeeded marthandavarma took over full control of the state and the padmanabha swamy temple and it is he who reconstructed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2022 (SC)

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... confiscation is only subject to conviction and such disposition in all practical sense, leads to a confiscation prior to such conviction. further, since there is no compensation in case a person is eventually acquitted, this would be a disproportionate action. as such, the argument that one needs to be restrained from selling or ..... . vs. union of india & ors., (1988) 2 scc299 municipal corporation of greater bombay & ors. vs. indian oil corporation ltd., 1991 supp (2) scc18 regional director, employees state insurance corporation vs. high land coffee works of p.f.x. saldanha and sons & anr., (1991) 3 scc617 forest range officer & ors. vs. p. mohammed ali ..... convention, although this would not be contrary to the basic concepts of the indian legal system. only the offences of holding drug proceeds (ndps act s.68c) or proceeds of terrorism (uapa s.21) are unconditional and may be considered to cover possession situations in these specific circumstances. also, the sections 266 410 and 411 ipc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2024 (SC)

The State Of Punjab Vs. Davinder Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... redress: this is the principle that undeserved inequalities call for redress; and since inequalities of birth and natural endowment are undeserved, these inequalities are somehow to be compensated for. society must, therefore, treat more favourably those with fewer native assets and those born into less favourable social positions. if the statement that equality of ..... not be confused with absolute equality.... under article 16(1) equality of opportunity of employment means 133 equality as between members of the same class of employees and not equality between members of separate, independent class.... the rule of parity is the equal treatment of equals in equal circumstances. the rule of differentiation ..... or, as the case may be, either chamber of the legislature of that province.26. it could thus be seen that the 1935 act provided that in any province where seat(s) is/are to be filled by the representatives of the scheduled castes where they are so allotted, shall be chosen by the members .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 1933 (FN)

Rogers Vs. Guaranty Trust Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the number of shares having par value equal to one-third of that year's compensation to each allottee rated at 100 percent and correspondingly less to those having lower ratings. and there was accorded to each of 535 employees, including directors and others active in the business, the right to subscribe for ..... bills of complaint without prejudice. reversed. mr. justice roberts took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. * section 1 of that act provides for the participation of employees in purchase of stock, profits, welfare work, and management of any corporation organized under the laws of the state, and declares: "any stock corporation ..... ultra vires. the statute directs that the board of directors shall "first formulate such plan," declare it "advisable," and call a meeting of stockholders to act on it. without presenting for the consideration of the stockholders any workable plan of stock allotment, the directors, in effect, asked the stockholders to confer plenary .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 1935 (FN)

Del Vecchio Vs. Bowers

Court : US Supreme Court

..... which this court will review on certiorari. p. 296 u. s. 285 . 2. section 3(b) of the longshoremen's and harbor workers' compensation act provides that "no compensation shall be payable if the injury was occasioned solely . . . by the willful intention of the employee to injure or kill himself. . . ." section 20 provides that ..... , in any proceeding to enforce a claim for compensation under the act, "it shall be presumed, ..... united states court of appeals which are based upon statutes so limited or which declare the common law of the district. the longshoremen's and harbor workers' compensation act, however, is national in scope, and a decision with respect to its enforcement constitutes a precedent of general application. we therefore granted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 1961 (FN)

Lathrop Vs. Donohue

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , has taken a formal page 367 u. s. 837 position with respect to a number of questions of legislative policy. these have included such subjects as an increase in the salaries of state supreme court justices; making attorneys notaries public; amending the federal career compensation act to apply to attorneys employed with the armed ..... money for purposes the contributor opposes. but the constitution does not protect against the mere play of personal emotions. we recognized in hanson that an employee can be required to contribute to the propagation of personally repugnant views on working conditions or retirement benefits that are expressed on union picket signs or ..... in . . . codes, laws and constitutional provisions." he alleges further that, in the course of this activity, "the state bar of wisconsin has used its employees, property and funds in active, unsolicited opposition to the adoption of legislation by the legislature of the state of wisconsin, which was favored by the plaintiff, all .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 1964 (FN)

United States Vs. Barnett

Court : US Supreme Court

..... james howard meredith from admission to continued attendance at the university of mississippi. it is further ordered that the defendants, their servants, agents, employees, successors and assigns, and all persons acting in concert with them, are enjoined to admit the plaintiff, james howard meredith to the university of mississippi upon his applications heretofore filed ..... "(3) disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command." [ footnote 5 ] in busby v. electric utilities employees union, 323 u. s. 72 , 323 u. s. 75 (1944), we held that: "this court will not answer a question which will not arise in the pending controversy unless another issue, not yet ..... trial rests is not of the same character or duration as the "historical error" discussed in green v. united states, supra, at 356 u. s. 185 , 356 u. s. 190 , 356 u. s. 202 . there, the alleged "error" occurred before the adoption of the constitution, and has been a part of english and american law for .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //