Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: employee s compensation act 1923 chapter 1 preliminary Page 2 of about 49,838 results (0.408 seconds)

Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank Ltd. Vs. Prescribed Authority, Under the R ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1992(1)WLC452; 1992(1)WLN500

..... can award monetary compensation or both. by virtue of sub-section [5] of section 28a, the order of the authority has been treated as final. rule-24-b, deals with the procedure which is required to be followed in deciding the complaint filed by an employee under section 28a (2) of the act.20. from the perusal ..... rajasthan shops and commercial establishment act, 1958 cannot be held applicable to such employees. shri pathak placed reliance on the decision of this court in b.n.k. sahkari wholesale upbhokta bhandar ltd. v. prescribed authority under the rajasthan shops and commercial establishment act, 1986 rlr 302.8. s/shri praveen balwada and s.k. kaushik; learned counsel ..... should have effect.13. the same question was again examined in u.p. state electricity board v. h.s. jain air 1979 sc 65. in that case, the question which arose was, as to whether (standing orders) act, 1946, prevail as against regulations regarding the age of superannuation made by the electricity board under the specific .....

Citicorp Indus. Credit Vs. Brock

Court : US Supreme Court

..... every employer, as defined in the act, "shall page 483 u. s. 33 pay to each of his employees" wages not less than the specified minimum rate; 7(a)(1) prohibits employment of any employee in excess of 40 hours per week "unless such employee receives compensation" at a rate of not less than one and one-half times the employee's regular rate. petitioner does not contest ..... and 7. the proposition that an employer complies with the flsa so long as its promised wage rates equal or exceed the statutory minimum, regardless of whether employees actually receive any compensation, would render illusory the act's protections. as this case demonstrates, such a rule would also encourage financially unstable employers to obtain labor when their financial condition indicates that they are unlikely .....

ElgIn Vs. Department of Treasury

Court : US Supreme Court

..... oral arg. 10, 21. that distinction is dubious at best. agencies are created by and act pursuant to statutes. thus, unless an action is beyond the scope ofthe agency s statutory authority, an employee s claim that the agency acted in an unconstitutional manner will generally be a claim that the statute authorizing the agency action was ..... court complaint, petitioners constitutional claims are the vehicle by which they seek to reverse the removal decisions, to return to federal employment, and to receive the compensation they would have earned but for the adverse employment action. see app. 29 30. a challenge to removal is precisely the type of personnel action ..... decisions, to return to federal employment, and to receive lost compensation. a challenge to removal is precisely the type of personnel action regularly adjudicated by the mspb and the federal circuit within the csra scheme, and reinstatement, backpay, and attorney s fees are precisely the kinds of relief that the csra empowers .....

The Sawatram Ramprasad Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Baliram Ukandaji and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1966SC616; (1966)ILLJ41SC; 1963MhLJ101(SC); [1966]1SCR764

..... in another form. this argument is fallacious at the very start because lay off and compensation for lay off are to be found only in chapter v-a ..... industrial matter arising between an employer and an employee or between employers or employees and that 'industrial matter* means any matter relating to pay, wages, reward, etc. it is submitted, therefore, that the dispute must come under the c.p. & berar act because of s. 31 of the 1956 (amendment) act and s. 25j of the 1953 (amendment) act already quoted. the argument is the last one .....

Khoday Distilleries Ltd. and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1419

..... acquisition to have lapsed being to enable the parties to get appropriate market value by way of compensation, and considering the objects and reasons of the act no. 68/1984 being that pendency of acquisition proceedings affects the scale of compensation, the same results in discrimination. reliance is placed on the decision of the supreme court in ..... contemplate hearing, oral hearing should be given in the light of the nature of the powers that are exercised under the act. such contentions advanced earlier had been considered by the supreme court in narayanaiah's case itself to which we have adverted to and it has been held that oral hearing in the matter is not ..... so far as they are applicable. in view of the decisions in narayanaiah's case and govindan's case by the supreme court in identical context, it must be held that the provisions of la act to the extent as are made applicable in bda act are attracted. separate provisions are made regarding the issue of preliminary notification and .....

Weston Electroniks Ltd Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1997IAD(Delhi)538; 65(1997)DLT587; (1997)ILLJ1230Del

..... came up for consideration. that section reads as under:- 'where any money is due to a newspaper employee from an employer under any of the provisions of this act, whether by way of compensation, gratuity or wages, the newspaper employee may, without prejudice to any other mode of recovery, make an application to the state government for the ..... whole of the claim made by the first respondent also contended that the person nominated had no jurisdiction to go into the merits arising from the first respondent's application. according to employer the first respondent had to establish his claim in the appropriate civil court. on the preliminary issue of jurisdiction the nominated authority ..... to usurp the powers of the tribunal for adjudication of valid disputes. to allow the government to do so would be to render s.10 and s. 12(5) of the industrial disputes act nugatory.'(33) the supreme court said that the demands raised in the said case had necessarily to be decided by the appropriate tribunal .....

South Arcot Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. Vs. Elumalai and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1959Mad401; (1959)ILLJ624Mad; (1959)2MLJ545

..... industrial disputes act, and, to enforce their claims they filed petitions before the labour court ..... not less than one year shall be entitled to notice and compensation as if he had been retrenched, unless certain conditions are satisfied. a large number of the employees of the undertaking which the government took over, from the s.a.e.d. co. ltd. considered that they were entitled to retrenchment compensation and certain other benefits referred to in section 25 of the .....

Del Vecchio Vs. Bowers

Court : US Supreme Court

..... which this court will review on certiorari. p. 296 u. s. 285 . 2. section 3(b) of the longshoremen's and harbor workers' compensation act provides that "no compensation shall be payable if the injury was occasioned solely . . . by the willful intention of the employee to injure or kill himself. . . ." section 20 provides that ..... , in any proceeding to enforce a claim for compensation under the act, "it shall be presumed, ..... united states court of appeals which are based upon statutes so limited or which declare the common law of the district. the longshoremen's and harbor workers' compensation act, however, is national in scope, and a decision with respect to its enforcement constitutes a precedent of general application. we therefore granted .....

Pawan Kumar Vs. Haryana Land Reclamation and Development Corporation

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1993)105PLR79

..... who is employed in that establishment immediately before the date of application for permission under this section shall be entitled to receive, at the time of retrenchment, compensation which shall be equivalent to fifteen days' average pay for every completed year of continuous service or any part thereof in excess of six months.' 7. before ..... to restore economic viability, 11 clerks-cum-typists were being declared surplus. it may be observed here that retrenchment compensation due under section 25f of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (hereinafter called the i.d. act), was also tendered along with the order of retrenchment. it is this order of retrenchment that has been impugned ..... go to show that it is carrying on 'manufaturing process,' as envisaged by section 2(k) of the factories act.15. the learned counsel for the petitioners cited the regional director, employees' state insurance corporation and ors. v. m/s. brooke bond india ltd., 2 and anr., 1978 lab. i.c. 1074 (a d.b. judgment of .....

The Central Bank of India Ltd. Vs. P.S. Rajagopalan Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1964SC743; [1963(7)FLR141]; (1963)IILLJ89SC; [1964]3SCR140

..... under a pre-existing contract, cannot be made under s. 33c(1). if a settlement has been duly reached between the employer and his employees and it falls under s. 18(2) or (3) of the act and is governed by s. 19(2), it would not be open to an employee, notwithstanding the said settlement, to claim the benefit ..... skill for the efficient discharge of his duties, and so, it thought that an extra payment in such cases is necessary by way of recognition of and compensation for this special skill or responsibility. in paragraph 162, the tribunal examined three alternatives suggested for its acceptance for making a provision for some special payment, and ..... it ultimately decided that a special allowance should be paid to those categories of employees who, by their special qualifications or skill, deserve recognition. in paragraph 163, the tribunal observed that the special allowance which it was about to prescribe was .....