Emphasized - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: emphasized Year: 1987 Page 1 of about 335 results (0.024 seconds)Suja International Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-09-1987
Reported in: (1989)(44)ELT387TriDel
l t 368 g o i 5 further it is emphasised that for classification under 39 01 06 the goods ought
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOrbital Enterprises Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Jun-10-1987
Reported in: (1988)(15)LC211Tri(Kol.)kata
were not liable to any fine or penalty he had emphasised that they had followed the prescribed law and procedure and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSiemens Aktiengesellschaft Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-06-1987
Reported in: (1987)22ITD87(Mum.)
protected statutorily by patents would not make any difference he emphasised that almost all the agreements contained clauses which prohibited the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHelper Girdharbhai Vs. Saiyed Mohmad Mirasaheb Kadri and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-06-1987
Reported in: AIR1987SC1782; (1987)2GLR960; JT1987(2)SC599; 1987(1)SCALE1235; (1987)3SCC538; [1987]3SCR289
functioning from the particular premises in question secondly it was emphasised by mr mehta that the partnership deed was a camouflage
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGuest Keen Williams Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-1987
Reported in: (1987)(13)LC553Tri(Delhi)
process and the only manual thing involved was transport he emphasised that the dgtd specifically stated that the heading in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadhasoami Satsang Sabha Vs. Rashtriya Mazdoor Congress and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-16-1987
Reported in: (1994)IIILLJ11All
relations between the participants is non industrial his lordship further emphasises that one must look at the predominant character of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSada and Etc. Etc. Vs. the Tahsildar, Utnoor, Adilabad District and an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-24-1987
Reported in: AIR1988AP77
jagannadha rao j 1 all these cases arise under the andhra pradesh telangana area tenancy and agricultural lands act act...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTModern Industrial Corporation Vs. Collector of Central Excise and ors
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-25-1987
Reported in: AIR1987SC2174; 1987(14)ECC11; 1987(12)LC1041(SC); 1987(31)ELT321(SC); JT1987(3)SC394; 1987(2)SCALE424; 1987(Supp)SCC374; [1987]3SCR1068; [1988]68STC415(SC)
1 this appeal under section 35 l of the central excise and salt act 1944 hereafter referred to as the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD. Navinchandra and Co. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-15-1987
Reported in: AIR1987SC1794; 1987(13)ECC1; 1987(29)ELT492(SC); JT1987(2)SC141; 1987(1)SCALE790; (1987)3SCC66; [1987]2SCR989
1978 79 this court reiterated and it was important to emphasise that on the reasoning which found favour with this court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSalonah Tea Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Superintendent of Taxes, Nowgong and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-18-1987
Reported in: AIR1990SC772; [1988]173ITR42(SC); 1987(2)SCALE1435; (1988)1SCC401; [1988]2SCR474; [1988]69STC290(SC)
c the court may adopt any reasonable rule bachawat j emphasised that for example the court will not allow a petitioner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial