Emphasized - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: emphasized Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 338 results (0.025 seconds)Najeema Beevi Vs. Public Service Commission
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-12-1982
Reported in: (1983)ILLJ433Ker
subramonian poti ag c j 1 the same question arises in all these cases and that is whether an employee...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra and A.R. Antulay Vs. Padmakar Balkrishna Samant
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-10-1982
Reported in: (1982)84BOMLR427
are sufficient to prove malice or ill will we are emphasising this aspect because in certain cases even a single allegation
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.P. Automobiles and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-05-1982
Reported in: 1983(2)KarLJ105; [1984]55STC93(Kar)
if any in section 6b 1 which was intended to emphasise that there is a turnover taxable under section 6 b
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Puri, Chandigarh Vs. Chief Commissioner, Chandigarh and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-18-1982
Reported in: AIR1982P& H301
to the ownership aspect vide objects and reasons aforequoted and emphasised 6 to appreciate the above deductions better let sections 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMukundrai Jivram Pandit Vs. State and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Aug-31-1982
Reported in: (1983)1GLR106
appoint out of its own body special committees and the emphasis must be given to the phrases out of its own
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Workmen of Buckingham and Carnatic Mills and Two ors. Vs. the Stat ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-1982
Reported in: [1982(45)FLR304]; (1982)IILLJ90Mad
bu a projection of the state what we wish to emphasise is that merely because a company or other legal person
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Tapang Light Foundry and Co.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-29-1982
Reported in: [1984]147ITR581(Cal)
the expression is person and not individual it must be emphasised that it is only in the ideal sense that a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR. Nanabhoy Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-1982
Reported in: [1983]53CompCas454(Delhi); 1983(4)DRJ309
between the client and the professional practitioner it is also emphasised that under the act it is a company which appoints
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCorporation of Calcutta Vs. East India Commercial Company Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-21-1982
Reported in: AIR1982Cal479,86CWN926
anil k sen j 1 these 7 rules obtained by the corporation of calcutta on as many as 7 revisional...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBakhtawar Singh Balkrishan Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-1982
Reported in: AIR1983Delhi201
the supreme court at calcutta referred to above the court emphasised the significance and importance of the distinction particularly when in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial