Elliott V Edwards - Judgment Search Results
Urmil and Others Vs. Savitri Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
December, 2014 + CS(OS) 3054/2012 URMIL AND OTHERS Through ..... Plaintiffs Mr. Rajat Aneja, Advocate & Ms. Rashmi Verma, Advocate versus SAVITRI DEVI Through ..... Defendant Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Advocate % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL
Nandini Sundar and ors. Vs. State of Chattisgarh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-05-2011
a sovereign democratic republic to conduct our affairs within the four corners of the Constitution, its goals and values. We expect the benefits of democratic participation to flow to us - all of us -, so that
Union of India and anr. Vs. Arulmozhi Iniarasu and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-06-2011
pursuant to the order passed by this Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors. v. Umadevi (3) & Ors.1, inter-alia directing the Union of India, State Governments and their instrumentalities to take steps
18-section briefs on any result in this list
State Bank of Mysore and ors. Vs. M.C.Krishnappa
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-06-2011
originally inducted in the service of the bank in the clerical cadre but at the material time, by virtue of promotions, he was in the Junior Management Grade Scale-I. He was served with a charge sheet on
Jalpat Rai and ors. Vs. State of Haryana
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-06-2011
were also charged for the offence punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. The trial court vide its judgment dated November 20, 2004 convicted A-2 under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to suffer life
Suba Singh and anr. Vs. Davinder Kaur and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-06-2011
of death, the age of Surinder Singh was about 25 years. He was a peasant and a motor vehicle driver by vocation. As a professional driver, he was in private service of certain persons named in the
Chandna Impex P.Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-06-2011
appellant, a body corporate, is engaged in the business of import of plywood, inlays, MDF laminated boards and veneer sheets etc. On 22nd May, 2000, one of the directors of the appellant, namely, Rakesh Chandna, was apprehended
Vijay Nayyar Vs. Om Prakash Malik
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2011
in July, 2010 in respect of one shop on the ground floor of property bearing no. B-202, Nehru Vihar, Timarpur, Delhi. It was claimed by the respondent in the eviction that he had three shops in the
Jagdish Chandra Makhija Vs. State (Cbi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2011
and P.K.Bhandari/PW5 were arranged and they were introduced to the complainant, his complaint shown to them and they verified the contents of the same by questioning the complainant. The complainant PW2 produced 250 GC notes of `100/-
R.K.P. Nishad Vs. C.B.I.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2011
1. The Appellant has been convicted by learned Special Judge in a corruption case number 52/94 vide judgment dated 18th July, 2002 and sentenced vide order dated 22nd July, 2002 as under: "Sentenced to undergo
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free