Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity supply act 1948 repealed chapter i introductory Sorted by: old Page 11 of about 878 results (0.184 seconds)

UjjaIn Mill Mazdoor Sangh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1980)IILLJ287MP; 1979MPLJ764

..... again distinguishable on the ground that there was a repugnancy created by the surcharge order made in 1968 and the existing law, i.e. , the electricity act, 1910, and the electricity (supply) act, 1948, and the assent of the president was needed to cure this repugnancy. in the case before us, there is no repugnancy between the amendments introduced ..... the presidential assent and not the possibility of repugnancy and that if the surcharge order. 1968 created a repugnancy between the kerala act on the one hand and the electricity act, 1970, and the electricity (supply) act. 1948, on the other, it is only the presidential assent subsequent to the surcharge order that can cure the repugnancy. this case ..... been extended from 5 to 7 years. on the question that any repugnancy between the surcharge order made in 1968 and the electricity act, 1910 and the electricity (supply) act. 1948, was cured by the assent given by the president in 1967, the supreme court held in the negative on the ground that .....

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Hindustan Aluminium Corpn. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1979SC1459; 1995LabIC1822; (1979)3SCC229; [1979]3SCR709

..... the amendments thereto the company received that supply and was even promised an additional supply of 35 mw over a phased period from july 1977, but did not get it. the company was ..... view that it is the statutory obligation of the u.p.s.e.b. because of the obligation of a licensee under sections 18 and 26 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948 to supply electrical energy to a consumer. reference in this connection has also been made to clause vi of the schedule to the ..... b. on november 30, 1976. for the supply of 85 mw of energy on a continuous basis, for a period of 5 years, in supersession of the earlier agreements, and it was stipulated that it would be read and construed in all respects in conformity with the provisions of the act, the electricity (supply) act, 1948, and the rules and the regulations and .....

Cannon Vs. University of Chicago

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the problems are quite different. [ footnote 3/6 ] none of the authorities cited in the opinion supports the result. sola electric co. v. jefferson electric co., 317 u. s. 173 (1942), and deitrick v. greaney, 309 u. s. 190 (1940), held that federal ..... enacted,' texas & pacific r. co. v. rigsby, 241 u. s. 33 , 241 u. s. 39 (1916) (emphasis supplied) -- that is, does the statute create a federal right in favor of the plaintiff? second, is there any indication of legislative intent, ..... demario jewelry, inc., 361 u. s. 288 (1960); schine chain theatres, inc. v. united states, 334 u. s. 110 (1948); and porter v. warner holding co., 328 u. s. 395 (1946), upheld various equitable remedies devised under an express equitable cause of ..... to exclude all others from representing employees, the court felt compelled to imply this duty. this construction of the act was necessary to avoid a difficult constitutional question, namely, the applicability of the constitution's prohibition of racial discrimination .....

Shah Mansur Peer Dargah and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1980Kant118; 1980(1)KarLJ469

..... sri g. n. seshagiri rao, learned counsel for respondent 'no. 3 without disputing the factual assertion of the petitioners, urged that s. 25 (8) of the act was not mandatory and was only a directory provision and the impugned order does not call nullification on that ground. in support of his contention sri murlidhar rao, strongly ..... anagwadi s. nos. 121, 122, 142 and 143-94acres 9 guntas..........................................total: 2384 acres and 27 guntas. 2. under the provisions of s. 25 of the wakf act, the present cultivator tenants of the said inam lands are intimated that they may offer their grievances and objections, if any, by appearing before the mysore state board of wakfs ..... or in the earlier registrations and decide whether they are wakf properties or not. s. 28 of the act, authorises the board to direct a muthavalli to apply for the registration of a wakf or direct him to supply any information regarding a wakf or may itself cause the wakf to be registered or at any time .....

Sarabhai M. Chemicals Private Ltd. and Telerad Private Ltd. Vs. P.N. M ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1980]126ITR1(Guj)

..... had already incurred debts and liabilities for development expenses such as opening out roads, laying out drains and sanitary arrangements, providing electricity and providing for a school. it seems to us that in the case of a concern carrying on the business of ..... [1962]46itr135(sc) and doughty's case [1927] ac 327 that no part of the slump price is taxable.' (emphasis* supplied). 27. it must be pointed out that the supreme court was dealing with the provisions of law as they stood before capital gains ..... the value of rupees ninety lakhs. the firm was dissolved and its business was discontinued with effect from february 1, 1948. in determining the capital gains on the sale of its assets it was common ground that the full value of ..... was also stated that the reason for initiating the proceedings for the acquisition of the aforesaid properties in terms of the act had been recorded by the competent authority and, therefore, in pursuance of section 269d, the competent authority was initiating the .....

New Satgram Engineering Works and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1981SC124; (1980)4SCC570; [1981]1SCR406

..... persons so empowered by the coal mines provident fund commissioner appointed by the central government, under section 3c of the coal mines provident fund, family pension and bonus schemes act, 1948. by sub-section (3) of section 20 the commissioner of payments is empowered to entertain claims, not being a claim which was time-barred on january 31, 1973 ..... which could not be realised by the central government until the specified date, would be realisable by them directly in order to meet their pre-existing: liabilities.48. in industrial supplies pvt. ltd. and anr. v. the union of india and ors. : [1981]1scr375 we have by our judgment delivered on august 7, 1980 held that the subsidy ..... ,675. as against this, the sales to the new satgram coal mines were only to the tune of rs. 3,71,384 representing the costs of light structurals supplied. with respect to the remaining sum of rs. 47,08,391 received by the engineering unit it was alleged to represent sales of light and medium structural works, .....

Peerulal Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1980WLN(UC)354

..... issued at all in the absence of such rules. the learned single judge, while relying on the authorities of narendra kumar v. union of india : [1960]2scr375 and mysore state electricity board v. bangalore woolen, cotton and silk mills ltd. and ors. air 1963 sc 1128, held that the words 'subject to the rules made by the state' used under ..... supra), their lordships were pleased to make the following observations on this point:it is not disputed that the amendments could be validly made under section 5 of the act 1 of 1948. we are therefore of opinion that the mere mistake in the opening part of the notification in reciting the wrong source of power does not effect the validity of ..... the amendments made. it is urged that the government knew that in could only make regulations, under section 5 and it made regulations under section 5 of act 1 of 1948 in certain cases even if that be so there can in our opinion be no doubt about the validity of the amendments made if the government had power to .....

State of Maharashtra Vs. Kusum Charudutt Bharma Upadhye

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1981)83BOMLR75; 1981MhLJ93

..... was a case which turned upon its own special facts. after the assam high court was constituted on april 5, 1948, by section 3 of the assam revenue tribunal (transfer of powers) act, 1948, the assam high court was empowered to exercise such jurisdiction to entertain appeals and revise decisions in revenue cases as was ..... -throughout the territories in relation to which it exercises jurisdiction and may, fur convenience. in: described as extraordinary original jurisdiction. (the emphasis has been, supplied by us.)this decision of the supreme court clearly shows that in exercising its power under article 226 the high court exercises original jurisdiction as contrasted with ..... 225. das gupta j., however, in his dissenting judgment followed the line of reasoning adopted in india electric works v. registrar of trade marks. subsequent to the giving of this judgment, as we have seen earlier, india electric works' case was expressly overruled by the supreme court in n.s. thread co. v. james chadwick .....

Nawn Estates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1982)26CTR(Cal)29,[1982]137ITR557(Cal)

..... a revenue receipt. reliance was also placed in this connection on certain observations of this court in the case of calcutta electric supply corporation ltd. v. cit : [1951]19itr406(cal) . there, the assessees were an electric supply co. during the war the government had requisitioned a generating plant of the assessee under rule 83(1) of the ..... . there interim payments under section 50(2) of the madras estates (abolition and conversion into ryotwari) act, 1948 (as applicable to andhra pradesh) received every year by a former holder of an estate which was abolished under the act, during the period between the taking over of the estate and the final determination and deposit of the ..... section provided that the arbitrator in making his award should have regard to the provisions of sub-section (1) of the section of the land acquisition act, being act i of 1894, so far as the same could be made applicable and whether the acquisition was of a permanent or temporary character and thereafter an .....

Fedorenko Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... quarrel is with congress, which drafted the statute. it is not the function of the courts to amend statutes under the guise of "statutory interpretation." see potomac electric power co. v. director, office of workers' compensation programs, ante at 449 u. s. 274 . finally, since the term "persecution" does not apply ..... provide the basis for stripping him of his american citizenship. the court's contrary holding today rests entirely on its construction of the displaced persons act of 1948 (dpa). although the court purports to consider the materiality of petitioner's misstatements, the court's construction of the dpa renders those misstatements ..... . because what would "possibly" be discovered is not "facts which might warrant denial of citizenship" but " other facts warranting denial of citizenship" (emphasis supplied), the "second test" simply asks whether knowledge of the suppressed facts could have enabled the government to reach the ultimate disqualifying facts whose existence is now .....