Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 8 amendment of section 43 Sorted by: recent Court: delhi Page 3 of about 11,078 results (0.777 seconds)

Jul 16 2019 (HC)

Aperam Alloys Imphy Sas vs.iup Jindal Metals and Alloys Limited

Court : Delhi

..... default, to be not entitled to specific performance. cs(comm) nos.1314/2016 & 45/2017 page 46 of 50 58. the specific relief act, 1963 has been amended with effect from 1st august, 2018 (notified from 1st october, 2018) to remove some impediments imposed thereby to specific performance of contracts and to ..... board (2012) 7 scc462 thirumalai cs(comm) nos.1314/2016 & 45/2017 page 47 of 50 chemicals ltd. vs. union of india (2011) 6 scc739and rajendra kumar vs. kalyan (2000) 8 scc99 59. reference may be made to vijaya myne vs. satya bhushan kaura (2007) 142 dlt483(db) of prior to the amendment to the specific relief act ..... 2007) 7 scc125that the law of specific relief in its essence is a part of the law of procedure, for, specific relief is a form of judicial redress. with respect to procedural laws, it has been consistently held that amendments thereto are retrospective. reference if any required may be made to purbanchal cables and conductors pvt. ltd. vs. assam state electricity .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2019 (HC)

Farhan Shaikh vs.state (National Investigation Agency)

Court : Delhi

..... decision of the full bench of the allahabad high court in in re provision of section 14a of sc/st (prevention of atrocities) amendment act,2015 (supra). section 14a of the amending act, considered by the full bench of the allahabad high court, reads as follows:"14a. appeals.-. (1) notwithstanding anything contained in the ..... department, (2008) 7 scc169 wherein the supreme court considered whether section 5 of the limitation act could be invoked in respect of an application under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act. (viii) chattisgarh state electricity board v. central electricity regulatory commission & ors, (2010) 5 scc23 wherein the issue considered by the supreme court ..... supra) has many hues. [emphasis is original]. rights jurisprudence 40. mr. aggarwal also relies on dilip s. dahanukar v. kotak mahindra co. ltd., (2007) 6 scc528 in this decision the supreme court observed: 12... right to appeal from a judgment of conviction affecting the liberty of a person keeping in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 2019 (HC)

Air Liquide North India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs.indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... notions of justice or morality as understood in paragraphs 36 to 39 of associate builders (supra). explanation 2 to section 34(2)(b)(ii)and explanation by the amendment act only so that western geco (supra), as understood in associate builders (supra), and paragraphs 28 and 29 in particular, is now done away with. 48(2)(b ..... seller has the option to source operating power from buyer s captive power plant up to a maximum 21 mw under open access policy after obtaining permission from haryana electricity regulatory commission (herc). buyer o.m.p. (comm) 322/2017 page 7 shall assist seller in obtaining the permission from herc. buyer will for the purpose ..... excluded from consideration all previous clarifications, correspondences, communications, etc.24. the respondent issued a detailed letter of acceptance (dloa) in favour of the petitioners on 16.04.2007. clause 12 of dloa described contract document . it included within it, in form of clause 12.4, the letter of waiver and in clause 12.5, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2019 (HC)

Traffic Media India Pvt. Ltd vs.delhi Metro Rail Corporation

Court : Delhi

..... engineering & construction co.ltd. v. national highways authority of india (nhai), 2019 scc online sc677 the supreme court, considering the amendments made in section 34 of the act by the arbitration and conciliation (amendment) act, 2015, has held as under: omp(comm.) no.104/2018 & 117/2018 page 21 41. the change made in section 28 ..... kishorilal gupta & bros.,air1959sc1362 alopi parshad & sons ltd. v. union of india, air1960sc588 jivarajbhai ujamshi sheth v. chintamanrao balaji, air1965sc214and renusagar power co. ltd. v. general electric co. (1984) 4 scc679 air1985sc1156 in rashtriya ispat nigam ltd. v. dewan chand ram saran, 45. (2012) 5 scc306 the court held: (scc pp. 320-21, ..... in clause 19 of the license agreement. he places reliance on the judgment of the supreme court in food corporation of india vs. chandu construction & anr., (2007) 4 scc697& satyanarayana construction company vs. uoi, (2011) 15 scc101 36. i am in agreement with the submission made by the learned senior counsel for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2019 (HC)

Delhi Metro Rail Corporation vs.traffic Media India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... engineering & construction co.ltd. v. national highways authority of india (nhai), 2019 scc online sc677 the supreme court, considering the amendments made in section 34 of the act by the arbitration and conciliation (amendment) act, 2015, has held as under: omp(comm.) no.104/2018 & 117/2018 page 21 41. the change made in section 28 ..... kishorilal gupta & bros.,air1959sc1362 alopi parshad & sons ltd. v. union of india, air1960sc588 jivarajbhai ujamshi sheth v. chintamanrao balaji, air1965sc214and renusagar power co. ltd. v. general electric co. (1984) 4 scc679 air1985sc1156 in rashtriya ispat nigam ltd. v. dewan chand ram saran, 45. (2012) 5 scc306 the court held: (scc pp. 320-21, ..... in clause 19 of the license agreement. he places reliance on the judgment of the supreme court in food corporation of india vs. chandu construction & anr., (2007) 4 scc697& satyanarayana construction company vs. uoi, (2011) 15 scc101 36. i am in agreement with the submission made by the learned senior counsel for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2019 (HC)

Shri Gauri Shanker vs.shri Laxmi Chand

Court : Delhi

..... relation thereto as rightly held by the learned rent controller, the embargo of section 19(2) of the delhi rc.rev.575/2017 page 13 of 14 rent control act, 1958 (as amended) would clearly assist the petitioner herein/ tenant in the event of the landlord not taking the possession of the tenanted premises within three years from the date of possession ..... the said tenanted premises are being run by the tenant i.e. the petitioner herein as a shop on a monthly rent at the rate of rs.350/-, exclusive of electricity charges as a single tenant and that he was inducted as a tenant on 01.03.1990 vide the lease deed dated 13.03.1990 vide which the tenancy commenced ..... /2017 page 1 of 14 the application of the present petitioner arrayed as the respondent to the eviction petition under section 25-b(4) of the delhi rent control act, 1958 (as amended),- was dismissed and an eviction order was passed against the tenant i.e. the petitioner herein qua the suit premises, with it having been directed that the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 2019 (HC)

Union of India vs.m.l. Gupta & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... tune of rs.50,000/- per sq. yards along with statutory benefits of solatium 30%, additional amount @ 12 % and interest under section 28 as per the amended la act.8. the lac, east responded to the effect that the compensation assessed by the lac was sufficient and reasonable and reflected the true market value prevailing at the ..... by the delhi development authority and financial institutions and had also failed to consider all the amenities and facilities of life which were available to the land i.e. electricity, power, telephone, water connections, metalled roads, regular transport by road and rail, fully developed markets, branches of various banks and schools; the land sold in open ..... as approved by delhi government.27. it is contended that property in question is falling in f category. the circle rate of the f category in the year 2007 for residential was rs. 16100/- and for commercial it was rs.48300/- while multiplying the residential circle rate by 3 times, by applying the delhi stamp ( .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 31 2019 (HC)

Allauddin vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... c. the period of limitation in filing the complaint shall be 3 years. proviso to section 135(1a) was only introduced vide the electricity amendment act, 2007 which came into effect from 15th june 2007 and hence it will not be applicable to the present case. he further submits that the inspection report has been signed by seven members ..... justice mukta gupta1 by the present appeal allauddin challenges the impugned judgment dated 16th december 2017, whereby he was convicted for the offence punishable under section 135 electricity act and the order on sentence dated 18th december 2017 directing him to undergo simple imprisonment for the period of one year six months and to pay a ..... lodged. consequently, fir no.128/2008 was registered at ps geeta colony for the offence punishable under section 135 electricity act.6. on the basis of a secret information, the petitioner was arrested on 24th march, 2007 vide arrest memo ex.pw-4/2. his personal search was conducted vide personal search memo ex.pw-4/1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 2019 (HC)

Aarshya Gulati (Through: Next Friend Mrs. Divya Gulati) and Ors. Vs.go ...

Court : Delhi

..... family property it is his submission that the existence of any huf / coparcenary is inconsequential for the purpose of the act of 2007. it is submitted that the notification dated july 28, 2017, amended the definition of property in the relevant rules to include all property, whether ancestral, or self-acquired. he would therefore ..... however, there is no dispute as regards the proposition of law laid down therein:1. 2 3 4 global energy limited and anr. v. central electricity regulatory commission, (2009) 15 scc570 subordinate legislation should always be read only within the confines and context of parent enactment. kunj behari lal butail and others ..... making powers cannot be construed to have been delegated to provide for an expansive policy / procedure. reliance is placed on global energy limited and anr. v. central electricity regulatory commission, (2009) 15 scc570 kunj behari lal butail and others. v. state of hp and others, (2003) 3 scc40and supreme court employees welfare association v .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 2019 (HC)

Ritika Jain vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University& Anr

Court : Delhi

..... by the mait, leading to award of b.tech degrees by the university, are the streams of computer science and engineering (cse), information technology (it), electricals and electronics engineering (eee), and mechanical and automation engineering (mae). all these courses stand approved by the all india council for technical education (aicte). the ..... in a case such as this, at crossroads. are the provisional admissions, granted to all the petitioners, to be declared illegal, based on the 2007 act and the 2007 rules, even though such a declaration would be contrary to the admission brochure of the ggsipu, the undertaking, to which the students were required to ..... also fulfil the eligibility criteria for programme applying for migration as laid down in the admissions brochure for the academic session 2017-18 as per amended provision of migration ordinance 7: no migration is permitted into the medical colleges of the guru gobind singh indraprastha university from any institution/college. issuance .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //