Court : Delhi
..... above 3,00,000 mts were shipped and they were accepted without any protest and demur. the terms of the letter of credit as agreed were neither varied nor amended and the amounts stood released in favour of the respondent no.1. in short, the terms of the contract stood fulfilled and any attempt on part of the ..... of india (2011) 123 drj724(db) and shree vinayaka cement clearing that fao (os) (comm) no.76/2016 page 21 of 23 agency vs. cement corporation of india (2007) 142 dlt385 it is also the contention of the senior counsel for the respondent that the argument made by the appellant before the learned single judge and being made before ..... of interference while deciding an appeal under section 37 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 is even more restrictive in nature. the supreme court of india has consistently held that an arbitration award should not be lightly interfered with. (see renusagar power co. ltd. v. general electric, (1994) supp. 1 scc; ongc v. saw pipes, (2003) 5 scc705 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... obligations through the electronic medium.43. it can be seen from the above that the underlying object of the i.t. act is to recognize transactions carried out by means of electric data interchange and electronic communication instead of the traditional paper based methods w.p.(c) 1429/2018 page 23 of 35 of ..... which provides for equal legal treatment of users of electronic communication and paper based communication. the legislature also recognized the need to bring in suitable consequential amendments in the existing laws of the country and facilitate e- commerce by providing legal recognition of electronic records and digital signatures, with the object of concluding ..... hrs., the petitioner commenced uploading the commercial bid documents.7. the petitioner has further averred in the petition that the respondent no.1/ongc kept on amending the tender specifications on several occasions and did so as late as on 30.1.2018, thereby compelling it to revisit its tender specifications and coordinate .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... of the supreme court in hrd corporation versus gail (india) limited, 2017 (10) scale71refers to the amendments made in section 34 of the a&c act vide arbitration and conciliation (amendment) act, 2015 and observes:-""section 28(3) has also been amended to bring it in line with the judgment of this court, in associate builders (supra), making it ..... of 9 it was also held:-""18. shri divan is right in drawing our attention to the fact that the 246th law commission report brought in amendments to the act narrowing the grounds of challenge co-terminus with seeing that independent, impartial and neutral arbitrators are appointed and that, therefore, we must be careful in preserving ..... act. the judgment in ongc v. saw pipes ltd., (2003) 5 scc705 has been expressly done away with. so has the judgment in ongc v. western geco international ltd., (2014) 9 scc263 both sections 34 and 48 have been brought back to the position of law contained in renusagar power plant co. ltd. v. general electric .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... or reasonable person could do. 28. furthermore, recently the supreme court in hrd corporation (supra), in light of the arbitration and conciliation (amendment) act, 2015 has held that section 28(3) has also been amended to bring it in line with the judgment of this court, in associate builders (supra), making it clear that the construction of the terms ..... handling of local users, the concessionaire shall be entitled to charge a monthly fee of rs.150 (rupees one hundred and fifty only), with reference to the base year 2007-08, to be revised annually in accordance with the fee rules to reflect the variation in wpi, and then rounded off to the nearest 5 (five) rupees; ..... under the act. the judgment in ongc v. saw pipes ltd., (2003) 5 scc705 has been expressly done away with. so has the judgment in ongc v. western geco international ltd., (2014) 9 scc263 both sections 34 and 48 have been brought back to the position of law contained in renusagar power plant co. ltd. v. general electric co., .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... aspects. clause (6) to article 19 also has a second part, which has been quoted in italics, enacted and inserted by section 3 of the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951. the second part of clause (6) of article 19 states that nothing in clause (g) would affect operation of any existing law insofar as it relates ..... and another versus state of orissa and others, 1991 supp (1) scc81 state of tamil nadu and others versus l. abu kavur bai and others, (1984) 1 scc515 tinsukhia electric supply co. ltd. versus state of assam and others, (1989) 3 scc709 utkal contractors & joinery (p) ltd. and others versus state of orissa, 1987 supp scc751 rashbihari ..... supplementary subsidiary, incidental etc.13. the aforesaid principles were referred to by the supreme court in udai singh dagar and others versus union of india and others, (2007) 10 scc306to observe that the test of reasonableness and general public interest laid down in state of madras versus v.g. row, air1952sc196may not ipso facto apply in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... aspects. clause (6) to article 19 also has a second part, which has been quoted in italics, enacted and inserted by section 3 of the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951. the second part of clause (6) of article 19 states that nothing in clause (g) would affect operation of any existing law insofar as it relates ..... and another versus state of orissa and others, 1991 supp (1) scc81 state of tamil nadu and others versus l. abu kavur bai and others, (1984) 1 scc515 tinsukhia electric supply co. ltd. versus state of assam and others, (1989) 3 scc709 utkal contractors & joinery (p) ltd. and others versus state of orissa, 1987 supp scc751 rashbihari ..... supplementary subsidiary, incidental etc.13. the aforesaid principles were referred to by the supreme court in udai singh dagar and others versus union of india and others, (2007) 10 scc306to observe that the test of reasonableness and general public interest laid down in state of madras versus v.g. row, air1952sc196may not ipso facto apply in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... aspects. clause (6) to article 19 also has a second part, which has been quoted in italics, enacted and inserted by section 3 of the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951. the second part of clause (6) of article 19 states that nothing in clause (g) would affect operation of any existing law insofar as it relates ..... and another versus state of orissa and others, 1991 supp (1) scc81 state of tamil nadu and others versus l. abu kavur bai and others, (1984) 1 scc515 tinsukhia electric supply co. ltd. versus state of assam and others, (1989) 3 scc709 utkal contractors & joinery (p) ltd. and others versus state of orissa, 1987 supp scc751 rashbihari ..... supplementary subsidiary, incidental etc.13. the aforesaid principles were referred to by the supreme court in udai singh dagar and others versus union of india and others, (2007) 10 scc306to observe that the test of reasonableness and general public interest laid down in state of madras versus v.g. row, air1952sc196may not ipso facto apply in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... aspects. clause (6) to article 19 also has a second part, which has been quoted in italics, enacted and inserted by section 3 of the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951. the second part of clause (6) of article 19 states that nothing in clause (g) would affect operation of any existing law insofar as it relates ..... and another versus state of orissa and others, 1991 supp (1) scc81 state of tamil nadu and others versus l. abu kavur bai and others, (1984) 1 scc515 tinsukhia electric supply co. ltd. versus state of assam and others, (1989) 3 scc709 utkal contractors & joinery (p) ltd. and others versus state of orissa, 1987 supp scc751 rashbihari ..... supplementary subsidiary, incidental etc.13. the aforesaid principles were referred to by the supreme court in udai singh dagar and others versus union of india and others, (2007) 10 scc306to observe that the test of reasonableness and general public interest laid down in state of madras versus v.g. row, air1952sc196may not ipso facto apply in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... aspects. clause (6) to article 19 also has a second part, which has been quoted in italics, enacted and inserted by section 3 of the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951. the second part of clause (6) of article 19 states that nothing in clause (g) would affect operation of any existing law insofar as it relates ..... and another versus state of orissa and others, 1991 supp (1) scc81 state of tamil nadu and others versus l. abu kavur bai and others, (1984) 1 scc515 tinsukhia electric supply co. ltd. versus state of assam and others, (1989) 3 scc709 utkal contractors & joinery (p) ltd. and others versus state of orissa, 1987 supp scc751 rashbihari ..... supplementary subsidiary, incidental etc.13. the aforesaid principles were referred to by the supreme court in udai singh dagar and others versus union of india and others, (2007) 10 scc306to observe that the test of reasonableness and general public interest laid down in state of madras versus v.g. row, air1952sc196may not ipso facto apply in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... aspects. clause (6) to article 19 also has a second part, which has been quoted in italics, enacted and inserted by section 3 of the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951. the second part of clause (6) of article 19 states that nothing in clause (g) would affect operation of any existing law insofar as it relates ..... and another versus state of orissa and others, 1991 supp (1) scc81 state of tamil nadu and others versus l. abu kavur bai and others, (1984) 1 scc515 tinsukhia electric supply co. ltd. versus state of assam and others, (1989) 3 scc709 utkal contractors & joinery (p) ltd. and others versus state of orissa, 1987 supp scc751 rashbihari ..... supplementary subsidiary, incidental etc.13. the aforesaid principles were referred to by the supreme court in udai singh dagar and others versus union of india and others, (2007) 10 scc306to observe that the test of reasonableness and general public interest laid down in state of madras versus v.g. row, air1952sc196may not ipso facto apply in .....
Tag this Judgment!