Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... un-authorised use of energy instruction no. 8.1 a. instructions for dealing the cases of theft of electricity under electricity act-2003, electricity (amendment) act, 2003 and electricity (amendment) act, 2007: (sc 43/2007): (i) theft of electricity (section-135 of the electricity act-2003) a person shall be guilty of an act of theft of electricity, if he dishonestly (a) taps, makes or causes to be made any connection with overhead, underground or under ..... the purpose other than usage was authorised shall be treated as theft of energy under section 135 (c) ) of electricity (amendment) act-2007 and where the usage is not dishonestly the same shall be treated as un authorised use of electricity under section 126 of electricity (amendment) act-2007. for illustration, in case a consumer is found using supply other than the purpose for which he is authorised and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the respondent to approach this court in cmp no.21/2003 which was filed for the balance amount.19. it is his further contention that thereafter the amendment was allowed restricting the first one only in respect of the retention money and the second one for the balance claim amount. the same has been observed in ..... the arbitration proceeding before the sole arbitrator initially for a total consolidated amount of rs.1,29,78,847/- along with interest. later the claim petition was amended and the claim was limited to an amount of rs.25,90,843/- along with interest of 24% which was compoundable quarterly from 04.12.2000 along ..... case is that the appellant the mysore lamp works limited is a company incorporated under the indian companies act, 1913 and engaged in providing lighting solutions and manufacturing and selling of bulbs, tube-lights etc. the then karnataka electricity board (keb) had entrusted the project sub-station at yelahanka for providing lighting installation to ancillary units .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... , explanation 2 to section 34(2)(b)(ii) has been proposed. after taking note of the supplementary report, the statement of objects and reasons of the amendment act, 2015, and the amended provisions of sections 28, 34 and 48, this court held: 34. what is clear, therefore, is that the expression public policy of india, whether contained ..... (supra) to determine perversity were followed in ssyanyong (supra) and later approved by a three-judge bench of this court in patel engineering limited v. north eastern electric power corporation limited55.67. in a recent three-judge bench decision of this court in delhi metro rail corporation ltd. v. delhi airport metro express pvt. ltd. ..... circumstances and have at times not even flinched from inventing a new head of public policy. (emphasis supplied) 34. in renusagar power co. ltd. v. general electric co.23, a three-judge bench of this court observed that the doctrine of public policy is somewhat open- textured and flexible. by citing earlier decisions, it .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... consider the case of the petitioners for promotion to the post of junior engineer and to promote them on the post as per the karnataka electricity board recruitment and promotion (amendment and regulations) 2020 and circular dated 12th june 2020.-. 5 - 2.2 in the impugned resolution dated 20th september 2022 passed by the ..... of seniority over the parent circle employees. 5.1 this policy is traceable from the provisions of the karnataka electricity board employees seniority regulations which are framed in exercise of powers under section 79c of the electricity (supply) act, 1948. regulation 6 thereof deals with the - 14 - transfer from one group/circle to another. this ..... .v. judgment (per: hon'ble the chief justice mr. justice n. v. anjaria) in the present appeal under section 4 of the karnataka high court act, 1961, the appellant-karnataka power transmission corporation limited has challenged judgment and order dated 21st march 2023 of learned single judge, whereby the writ petition filed by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... for. we, therefore, declare that our decision will not affect the validity of the constitution (seventeenth amendment) act, 1964, or other amendments made to the constitution taking away or abridging the fundamental rights. we further declare that in future the parliament will have no power to amend part iii of the constitution so as to take away or abridge the fundamental rights. (emphasis ..... would amount to a violation of the rules of natural 14 baburam v. c c jacob, (1999) 3 scc362[5]. 15 somaiya organics (supra) [37]. 16 raymond ltd. v. mp electricity board, (2001) 1 scc534[24].; sarwan kumar v. madan lal aggarwal, (2003) 4 scc147[15].; ramesh kumar soni v. state of m p, (2013) 14 scc696[21].. 17 l ..... writ petition (c) no.1029 of 2019 with special leave petition (c) no.16028 of 2021 with civil appeal no.4286 of 2023 with civil appeal no.5682 of 2007 with civil appeal no.1295 of 2008 with civil appeal no.874 of 2013 with page 1 of 22 civil appeal nos. 8269-8271 of 2013 with civil appeal no .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... text of the statute, iii) submissions of lawyers opens up a debate and as officers of the 18 state of haryana v. mukesh kumar, (2011) 10 scc404 pravin electricals (p) ltd. v. galaxy infra & engineering (p) ltd. (2021) 5 scc671 preeti gupta v. state of jharkhand, (2010) 7 scc667 arif azim co. ..... and arbitrariness doctrines) but also the breadth of the judicial power has substantially expanded to areas that were hitherto forbidden (review of policy decisions, constitutional amendments and continuing mandamus being prime examples). however, even this expansive reading of judicial review does not capture the essence of the judicial branch in its ..... examined the matter, the bench may consider directing the government to constitute a committee for performance audit of the act. the court s jurisdiction extends only to that extent, and no further. the law-making, including amendments, is the exclusive domain of the legislature. ....j.[pamidighantam sri narasimha]. ....j.[aravind kumar]. new delhi; .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... to rule on the issue of existence of the arbitration agreement in depth.113. referring to the statement of objects and reasons of the arbitration and conciliation (amendment) act, 2015, it was observed in in re: interplay (supra) that the high court and the supreme court at the stage of appointment of arbitrator shall examine ..... or fraudulent etc. in which case, the entire contract along with the arbitration clause is non est, or voidable. [ ]. (emphasis supplied) 62. in bharat heavy electricals ltd. vs. amar nath bhan prakash reported in (1982) 1 scc625it was observed by this court that the question whether there was discharge of the contract by accord and ..... on the plea of novation and accord and satisfaction . as observed in premium nafta products ltd. [fili shipping co. ltd. v. premium nafta products ltd., 2007 ukhl40:2007. bus lr1719(hl)]. , it is not to be expected that commercial men while entering transactions inter se would knowingly create a system which would require that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... /2020 high court of karnataka, bengaluru, dated:04. 11.2020 circular sub: disposal of cases filed under section 20(b) of "the specific relief act, 1963 and (amendment) act, 2018". the government of karnataka vide notification no.law84lce2018dated 25.10.2019 and corrigendum dated 03.12.2019 has designated the courts mentioned therein as special ..... wp no.102751 of 2024 dedicated for the trial of suits pending before the existing designated special courts under section 20(b) of "the specific relief act, 1963 and (amendment) act, 2018" on priority basis. by order of the high court, (rajendra badamikar) registrar general4. the counsel for petitioner argued that the trial court's ..... 8 - nc:2024. khc-d:9912 wp no.102751 of 2024 approval from the ministry of power, government of india, under section 68(1) of the electricity act, 2003, for the installation of a dedicated overhead transmission line to support its wind and solar projects. the petitioner has claimed that there is an existing agreement .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... and incorrect understanding of the principle of interpretation which has been relied upon. the principle discussed in the celebrated treatise in question is as follows: 15. when an amending act alters the language of the principal statute, the alteration must be taken to have been made deliberately. [ed.: as observed in d.r. fraser & co. ..... as laid down in union of india v. popular construction co. [(2001) 8 scc470 , mukri gopalan v. cheppilat puthanpurayil aboobacker [(1995) 5 scc5 , chhattisgarh seb v. central electricity regulatory commission [(2010) 5 scc23 , cce and customs v. hongo india (p) ltd. [(2009) 5 scc791 and gopal sardar v. karuna sardar [gopal sardar v. karuna ..... back to the drt for reconsideration - 6 - nc:2024. khc:25805 wp no.21349 of 2022 afresh, the petitioners would take necessary steps to seek amendment of the petition before the drt and seek appropriate reliefs including challenging the sale proceedings and the auction sale by impleading the auction purchaser also.8. i .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... has held as follows . . section354 of ipc. voyeurism : analysis and findings10 voyeurism has been introduced as a sex crime against women in india by way of the criminal law (amendment) act, 2013. since the appellant has been - 10 - nc:2024. khc:20179 crl.p no.2396 of 2024 convicted and sentenced inter alia under section 354c of ipc, it ..... 20179 crl.p no.2396 of 2024 therefore, the allegation against the petitioner is that he has indulged in placing a mobile phone in or inside or above the electric switch board to record the videos or the pictures of the complainant. the police have filed the charge sheet after investigation.12. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner ..... that the accused with intentions mala fide and motives ulterior - 3 - nc:2024. khc:20179 crl.p no.2396 of 2024 placed a mobile phone inside the electric switch board situated in the hall of the premises belonging to the complainant and captured her private images and began to share the same with the in-laws of her .....
Tag this Judgment!