Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... /2020 high court of karnataka, bengaluru, dated:04. 11.2020 circular sub: disposal of cases filed under section 20(b) of "the specific relief act, 1963 and (amendment) act, 2018". the government of karnataka vide notification no.law84lce2018dated 25.10.2019 and corrigendum dated 03.12.2019 has designated the courts mentioned therein as special ..... wp no.102751 of 2024 dedicated for the trial of suits pending before the existing designated special courts under section 20(b) of "the specific relief act, 1963 and (amendment) act, 2018" on priority basis. by order of the high court, (rajendra badamikar) registrar general4. the counsel for petitioner argued that the trial court's ..... 8 - nc:2024. khc-d:9912 wp no.102751 of 2024 approval from the ministry of power, government of india, under section 68(1) of the electricity act, 2003, for the installation of a dedicated overhead transmission line to support its wind and solar projects. the petitioner has claimed that there is an existing agreement .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... rate of market fee payable in respect of private market yards and direct purchasers other than in a spot exchange by virtue of amendment act no.23 of 2007 w.e.f 16.08.2007 whereby section 72-a to section 72-e were inserted along with 3rd proviso which complemented each other were sought to be ..... of any description which is made available to potential users and includes the provision of facilities in connection with banking, financing, insurance, transport, processing, supply of electrical or other energy, board or lodging or both, housing construction, entertainment, amusement or the purveying of news or other information, but does not include the rendering of ..... or nationalised bank renders as much service as private bank. no distinction can be drawn in private and public transport or insurance companies. even the supply of electricity or gas which throughout the country is being made, mainly, by statutory authorities is included in it. the legislative intention is thus clear to protect a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... rate of market fee payable in respect of private market yards and direct purchasers other than in a spot exchange by virtue of amendment act no.23 of 2007 w.e.f 16.08.2007 whereby section 72-a to section 72-e were inserted along with 3rd proviso which complemented each other were sought to be ..... of any description which is made available to potential users and includes the provision of facilities in connection with banking, financing, insurance, transport, processing, supply of electrical or other energy, board or lodging or both, housing construction, entertainment, amusement or the purveying of news or other information, but does not include the rendering of ..... or nationalised bank renders as much service as private bank. no distinction can be drawn in private and public transport or insurance companies. even the supply of electricity or gas which throughout the country is being made, mainly, by statutory authorities is included in it. the legislative intention is thus clear to protect a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... receipt of arbitral award by the applicant. apart from sub-sections (2) and (3) of section 34, sub-section (5) inserted by way of the amendment to the act in 2015, which mandates issuance of prior notice to the other party before filing of application under section 34.15. upon careful examination of the provisions of section ..... the arbitrator through rpad.10. in the recent judgments, rendered by the delhi high court in the case of india tourism development corporation vs. m/s. bajaj electricals limited4, the delhi high court has reiterated the dictum laid down by the ongc case and emphasized that section 34 application must be accompanied by a copy of ..... 6. heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondents. perused the order under challenge.7. section 34 of the a&c act confers right upon a party to file an application before the court for setting aside an arbitral award. while filing such an application, there are certain accepted procedures .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... he has placed a reliance on the decision of the apex court in the case of purbanchal cable and conductor private limited and others -vs- assam state electricity board and others reported in (2012) 7 scc462 v) the petitioners who are granted with the licences to sell liquor have locus standi to maintain writ petition ..... legislation the applicability of rule 12 cannot be excluded is untenable.20. the petitioners have also challenged the impugned rule on the ground that the amended rules have been amended so as to circumvent the judgment of the division bench of this court in the case of state of41karnataka -vs- mandya district wines merchants association ..... considering sections 13, 15 and 71(2) of the act, has held as follows: the act is clearly within the legislative competence of this state legislature. nobody has challenged the amended rules or within the scope of delegated authority under section 71 of the act. if the main act is within the legislative competence of the state legislature .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... he has placed a reliance on the decision of the apex court in the case of purbanchal cable and conductor private limited and others -vs- assam state electricity board and others reported in (2012) 7 scc462 v) the petitioners who are granted with the licences to sell liquor have locus standi to maintain writ petition ..... legislation the applicability of rule 12 cannot be excluded is untenable.20. the petitioners have also challenged the impugned rule on the ground that the amended rules have been amended so as to circumvent the judgment of the division bench of this court in the case of state of41karnataka -vs- mandya district wines merchants association ..... considering sections 13, 15 and 71(2) of the act, has held as follows: the act is clearly within the legislative competence of this state legislature. nobody has challenged the amended rules or within the scope of delegated authority under section 71 of the act. if the main act is within the legislative competence of the state legislature .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... he has placed a reliance on the decision of the apex court in the case of purbanchal cable and conductor private limited and others -vs- assam state electricity board and others reported in (2012) 7 scc462 v) the petitioners who are granted with the licences to sell liquor have locus standi to maintain writ petition ..... legislation the applicability of rule 12 cannot be excluded is untenable.20. the petitioners have also challenged the impugned rule on the ground that the amended rules have been amended so as to circumvent the judgment of the division bench of this court in the case of state of41karnataka -vs- mandya district wines merchants association ..... considering sections 13, 15 and 71(2) of the act, has held as follows: the act is clearly within the legislative competence of this state legislature. nobody has challenged the amended rules or within the scope of delegated authority under section 71 of the act. if the main act is within the legislative competence of the state legislature .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... he has placed a reliance on the decision of the apex court in the case of purbanchal cable and conductor private limited and others -vs- assam state electricity board and others reported in (2012) 7 scc462 v) the petitioners who are granted with the licences to sell liquor have locus standi to maintain writ petition ..... legislation the applicability of rule 12 cannot be excluded is untenable.20. the petitioners have also challenged the impugned rule on the ground that the amended rules have been amended so as to circumvent the judgment of the division bench of this court in the case of state of41karnataka -vs- mandya district wines merchants association ..... considering sections 13, 15 and 71(2) of the act, has held as follows: the act is clearly within the legislative competence of this state legislature. nobody has challenged the amended rules or within the scope of delegated authority under section 71 of the act. if the main act is within the legislative competence of the state legislature .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... he has placed a reliance on the decision of the apex court in the case of purbanchal cable and conductor private limited and others -vs- assam state electricity board and others reported in (2012) 7 scc462 v) the petitioners who are granted with the licences to sell liquor have locus standi to maintain writ petition ..... legislation the applicability of rule 12 cannot be excluded is untenable.20. the petitioners have also challenged the impugned rule on the ground that the amended rules have been amended so as to circumvent the judgment of the division bench of this court in the case of state of41karnataka -vs- mandya district wines merchants association ..... considering sections 13, 15 and 71(2) of the act, has held as follows: the act is clearly within the legislative competence of this state legislature. nobody has challenged the amended rules or within the scope of delegated authority under section 71 of the act. if the main act is within the legislative competence of the state legislature .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... he has placed a reliance on the decision of the apex court in the case of purbanchal cable and conductor private limited and others -vs- assam state electricity board and others reported in (2012) 7 scc462 v) the petitioners who are granted with the licences to sell liquor have locus standi to maintain writ petition ..... legislation the applicability of rule 12 cannot be excluded is untenable.20. the petitioners have also challenged the impugned rule on the ground that the amended rules have been amended so as to circumvent the judgment of the division bench of this court in the case of state of41karnataka -vs- mandya district wines merchants association ..... considering sections 13, 15 and 71(2) of the act, has held as follows: the act is clearly within the legislative competence of this state legislature. nobody has challenged the amended rules or within the scope of delegated authority under section 71 of the act. if the main act is within the legislative competence of the state legislature .....
Tag this Judgment!