Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 17 amendment of section 153 Court: appellate tribunal for electricity aptel Page 9 of about 196 results (0.170 seconds)

Punjab State Transmission Corporation Limited Vs. Punjab State Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

..... shall be computed on the paid up equity capital determined in accordance with regulation 24 and shall be guided by the central electricity regulatory commission (terms and conditions of tariff) regulations, 2004 as amended by the cerc from time to time. the same principles will apply for distribution business also as far as possible. 2 ..... to the present appeal are as under: (a) that the appellant is a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 and is vested with the function of transmission of electricity in the state of punjab. the appellant is also the state transmission utility (stu) and the state load despatch centre (sldc ..... commission is the regulatory commission for the state of punjab discharging functions and exercising powers under section 61, 62, 64, 86 and other applicable provisions of the electricity act, 2003. (d) that the respondent no.2 is the distribution licensee in the state of punjab and is the beneficiary of the transmission system of the .....

Shamanur Sugars Limited Vs. M/S. Bangalore Electricity Supply Company ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

..... the fact that the appellant had supplied power to the 3rd party only after obtaining the open access from state load despatch centre in accordance with the provisions of the electricity act, 2003. as a matter of fact, the state commission while considering the issue no.3 in op no.26 of 2008 had clearly found that the consent for the ..... no direction could be issued to the generating company to supply power to the distribution company. only thereafter, the interim application has been filed by the distribution company for amendment seeking in the main petition for the declaration that the power purchase agreement dated 7.3.1998 and the supplemental ppa dated 5.3.2006 were valid and binding upon ..... term open access to sale 14 mw power by m/s. shamanur sugars ltd.,(ssl) ref: 1) stoa applications dated 20.6.2008 2) cerc order dated 3.12.2007 in respect of the stoa case of m/s. vishwanath sugars ltd.,(vsl) as per new regulations and guidelines for stoa issued by cerc, the consent for sale of power .....

Reliance Energy Limited Vs. the Tata Power Company Limited and

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL662

..... the consumers of rel.tata power, secured four licenses from government of maharashtra, which have been amended from time to time. the tata power, it is contended, is not entitled to distribute/or directly sell power to consumers in contravention of the indian electricity act, 1910, the electricity (supply) act, 1948 and as per the policy of the state government. it was the alternate contention ..... supply of the licensee or some part thereof and includes the maharashtra state electricity board.34. clause 5 of the earlier licenses have been substituted by amendment with respect to purposes of supply and it proceeds thus: (i) subject to the provisions of this license, of the act, of the electricity (supply) act, 1948, and of the rules thereunder, energy shall be supplied under this .....

Siel Limited Vs. the Punjab State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL931

..... to be a far cry in view of the recent electricity (amendment) bill, 2005, which has been tabled in the parliament. section 7 of the amendment bill seeks to substitute the following clause in place of section 61(g) of the principal act: (g) that the tariff progressively reflects the cost of supply of electricity, and also reduces cross subsidies in the manner specified by ..... exercise is completed the commission shall give effect to it in the determination of tariff for the year 2007-08 as well. from the year 2007-08, the commission is directed to determine separate tariff for generation, transmission, distribution, wheeling and retail sale of electricity.157. the learned counsel for the board submitted that the commission while conducting a truing up exercise for .....

Global Energy Limited Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL1350

..... the licence.45. in order to determine the question raised by the appellant, it is necessary to set out the relevant part of section 15 of the electricity act, 2003 as under: (2) any person who has made an application for grant of licence shall, within seven days after making such application, publish a ..... copies of the annexures.16. while the matter was pending before the cerc, on april 13, 2006 the central electricity regulatory commission (procedure, terms and conditions for grant of trading licence and other related matters) amendment regulations, 2006 were notified. this inter-alia, resulted in insertion of regulation 6a in the regulations. in the context ..... by the corporation cannot be blamed for delay but during pendency of its application for sanction, if the state government, in exercise of its rule-making power, amended the building rules and imposed restrictions on the heights of building on g.t. road and other wards, such "settled expectation" has been rendered impossible for .....

In the Matter Of: Tamil Nadu Electricity Consumersand#8217; Associatio ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... to be based on the cost to supply a consumer category. however, it is not the intent of the act after the amendment in the year 2007 (act 26 of 2007) that the tariff should be the mirror image of the cost of supply of electricity to a category of consumer. 22. after cogent reading of all the above provisions of the ..... and 112 of 2010 in the matter of tata steel limited and ors vs. orissa electricity regulatory commission, etc. the relevant extracts from the judgment are as under: 17thus the intention of the parliament in amending the above provisions of the act by removing provision for elimination of cross subsidies appears to be that the cross subsidies may ..... act, the policy and the regulations we infer the following:i) the cross subsidy for a consumer category is the .....

In the Matter: M/S. Entertainment World Developers Pvt.Ltd, Madhya Pra ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... group of non-domestic consumers are not in conformity with the 7th proviso to section 14 of the electricity act, 2003.ii) consequent upon the high courts order dated 05.10.2007 passed in writ petition no. 2749 of 2007 the appellant approached the commission which passed the order on 3rd october,2008.iii) the respondent no ..... of name, shifting or premises, change in connected load or change of tariff category shall be done if both the consumer and the licensee agree to these amendments and the same shall be incorporated in the agreement by execution of supplementary agreement. 19. it is argued that no supplementary agreement as envisaged in the ..... all the facts. the commission further directed the respondent no.2 to provide individual connection to all such domestic consumers as per the provisions of electricity supply code, 2004 as amended. the commission while disposing of the case issued following directions in its order dated 31.10.2008: 5. the commission further directs the commission .....

In the Matter: Shri Rama Shankar Awasthi, Lucknow and Others Vs. Uttar ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... the impugned order dated 31.3.2010 is in issue. such an action is impermissible considering judicial propriety, apart from being contrary to the provisions of the electricity act, 2003. 5. we have on record no written objection to the interlocutory application of the appellants. learned sr. counsel assisted by mr. pradeep mishra, ..... proceeding. further it is submitted on behalf of the respondents that the appellants have right of representation in connection with the proceedings in relation to the amendment of the tariff order. mr. anand k ganesan, learned advocate for the appellants contradicts the submissions of mr. mishra to say that proceedings initiated is ..... tribunal. instead of filing any tariff petition for the subsequent year or otherwise complying with the statutory provisions, the licensees are only attempting to have amendment of the existing tariff which cannot be done in view of the order determining such tariff is under appeal before this tribunal. it is further contended .....

In the Matter of : Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited Vs. Rajasthan Ele ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... . the appellant also disputes the finding of the commission as part of the claim being barred by section 56(2) of the electricity act 2003. further the appellant challenges the commissions jurisdiction to direct an amendment in the ppa. jurisdiction: 22) so far as the jurisdiction is concerned suffice it to refer to section 86(i)(f) ..... 04.11.2006 in petition no. 100 of 2006 and the subsequent order dated 13.04.2007 declining to review the order dated 04.11.06. the appellant, ajmer vidyut vitran nigam ltd. (avvnl), is the successor in interest of the rajasthan state electricity board (rseb). the background facts: 2) the respondent no.2, which runs the ..... by the state government of rajasthan, has challenged the order dated 13 apr. 07 in review petition no. 124 of 2007 and original order dated 04 nov. 2006 in petition no. 100 of 2006 passed by rajasthan electricity regulatory commission (hereinafter to be referred to as the commission/rerc). petition no. 100 of 2006 was preferred by .....

Gvk (Goindwal Sahib) Limited, Andhra Pradesh Vs. Punjab State Electric ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... by the government of india? ii. whether the state commission in exercise of its powers under section 86(i)(b) of the act, 2003 can mechanically direct the electricity board to modify the amended and re-stated ppa concluded between the parties to be in line with the standard bidding documents, instead of examining the proposal contained ..... approval of the said amended and restated ppa. (vi) the ..... consumers of the electricity board. (v) in terms of the section 86(1)(b) of the act of 2003, the amended ppa, finalized between the appellants and the respondents has to get the approval of the state commission. therefore, the electricity board filed the petition before the said commission being no.3 of 2007 on 20.3.2007 for the .....