Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 17 amendment of section 153 Court: appellate tribunal for electricity aptel Page 10 of about 196 results (0.219 seconds)

In the Matter of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Li ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... as a matter of fact, main regulations were framed on 15.6.2010 and were amended by the central commission on 4.4.2011 while exercising powers under section 178 of the electricity act,2003. let us quote section 178 of the electricity act, 2003: 178. powers of central commission to make regulations.(1) the central ..... dated 15.6.2010 had followed the consultative process in accordance with the requirements of section 178 of electricity act,2003, by making previous publication. but while passing the impugned order dated 4.4.2011 amending the regulations, the central commission has dispensed with the said requirement of previous publication as contemplated under section ..... integral part of ists regulations of 2010. when the direction in relation to the amendment of regulations is given, it cannot be said that it is an adjudicatory order which decides the disputes between the parties. the electricity act, 2003 contains separate provisions for performance of dual functions of the commission. 26. .....

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., (Ongc), Ahmedabad Vs. Gujrat Ele ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... will be eligible for setting up of wtgs, either for captive use and/or selling the energy, in accordance with the electricity act 2003, as amended from time to time. explanation : the use of electricity for own consumption at his end use location/s by the owner of wtgs shall be considered as captive use. 5. wheeling ..... brought to its notice during proceedings and appellant had agreed to be covered by amended policy? v. whether government of gujarats amendment to 2007 policy date 7.1.2009 fixing wheeling charges for captive wind energy generators is legally tenable in terms of electricity act 2003. 22. we shall now deal with each question one by one. ..... contained in this resolution, the provisions of the electricity act 2003 and the gerc regulations, as issued from time to time, shall prevail, for the purpose of the implementation of this policy. thus the arrangement of wheeling power from appellants wind energy generators as per amendment to 2007 policy and commissions order dated 6.5. .....

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission a ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... approved sales by the commission are in complete disregard of the statutory obligations of the discoms under section 43 of the electricity act, 2003. b) the same growth rate was projected by the appellant for 2007-08 in the myt period which was ignored by derc. however, without stating any reason derc has lowered the projected growth ..... not challenging the regulations. the appellants grievance in this appeal is that the commission instead of following the regulations should have exercised its discretion to amend the regulations. the appellant further contends that the commissions reasoning that tandd loss trajectory can be derived from atandc loss levels given in the myt ..... licensee. hence reference to the initial level of loss at the time of privatization is not necessary. the commission may itself consider the plea of any amendment in the target set in this regard in case the appellant makes out a case. therefore, we direct that the appellant may make an appropriate representation .....

M/S. Penna Electricity Ltd., Chennai Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

..... filed by the appellant during the pendency of drp no.14 of 2010 praying for the direction for the amendments to ensure and insulate the operation of the generating station so that the station would be functional in alignment within the electricity act, 2003 and regulations. 27. while discussing this issue, let us see the question framed by the commission ..... valuthur-ii power plant and the appellant developed the power plant called m/s. arkay energy limited (energy) rameswaram. both the new plants were commissioned during the year 2007. it is pertinent to note that the availability of gas to all the consumer in the perungulam region started to reduce. the appellants new power plant has also contributed ..... on 16.12.1999 and 31.7.2008 with regard to supply of gas in different quantities. 16. during the period from 1.7.2006 to 23.10.2007, sufficient quantity of natural gas was available to the appellant to operate the power plant at 52.8 mw contracted capacity but the tariff heat rate by the plant .....

AllaIn Duhangan Hydro Power Limited Vs. Everest Power Private Limited ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

..... system (ats) of 2x96 mw allain duhangan hep in himachal pradesh. the approval is subject to compliance of (a) the requirement of the relevant provisions of the electricity act, 2003, as amended from time to time and the rules and regulations framed there under and (b) the rules governing the overhead lines as specified in the indian ..... the proposal of the appellant to construct the allain duhangan nalagarh line as part of associated transmission system for evacuation of power from their hydro electric project. cea in its letter dated 31.7.2007 to the ministry of power communicated its no objection to the proposal subject to the following: ii) out of the total 400 mw ..... made available for evacuation of power from other projects in parbati/beas valley, viz., malana ii (100 mw) and sainj (100 mw) 5.5 on 21.8.2007, the ministry of power accorded the approval for construction of allain duhangan -nalagarh 220 kv double circuit line as the associated transmission system of allain duhangan hep. 5.6 .....

Shree Cement Limited Vs. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission V ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

..... :- a. that while passing the impugned order the state commission has duly considered provisions of the electricity act, 2003, rerc (supply code and connected matters) regulations, 2004, rerc ( term and conditions for open access) 3rd amendment regulation, 2004. the relevant portion of the impugned order dated 06.06.13 is reproduced here ..... periods and therefore he becomes a consumer of different class which difference is permissible under the factors enumerated in section 62 (3) of the electricity act, 2003. 12.12 the appellant has neither changed the open access regulations nor the meter regulations, thus it cannot claim recording of time in ..... electricity act, 2003, the appropriate commission may differentiate according to the consumers load factor, power factor, voltage, nature of supply and the purpose for which the supply is required. i. that according to regulation 12 of the rerc (terms and conditions for open access) regulations, 2004 (amended upto 30.03.2007 vide 4th amendment, .....

Tamil Nadu Electricity Consumersâandeuro;andtrade; Association (Repre ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

..... provided under the impugned order is contrary to its own regulations viz., rpo regulations 2010 and beyond the powers of the state commission assigned under the electricity act. therefore, this is not legally valid. the impugned order is also discriminatory to some categories of consumers, as they have been entrusted with the spo ..... following questions would arise for our consideration: i) whether the policy directive issued by the state government to the state commission under section 108 of the electricity act, 2003 regarding the implementation of the solar policy was binding on the state commission? ii) whether the state commission was correct in specifying the solar ..... the national electricity policy and tariff policy. 17. thus, the directions of the state government to the state commission regarding promotion of solar energy through spo has to be exercised only under section 86(1)(e) of the 2003 act. 18. the state commission had already notified the rpo regulations, 2010 as amended on 29 .....

Central Coalfields Limited, Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL880

..... creature of a statute. its jurisdiction is also conferred by a statute. the purpose of creation of tdsat has expressly been stated by parliament in the amending act of 2000. tdsat, thus, failed to take into consideration the amplitude of its jurisdiction and thus misdirected itself in law. 79. the court noticed the ..... be no challenge before this appellate forum as against the resolution of tariff dispute.33. this appellate tribunal has been established under section 110 of the electricity act, 2003. section 111 provides for an appeal to this appellate tribunal. before this appellate tribunal any person aggrieved by an order made by an ..... hearing this appellate tribunal raised the issue relating to the jurisdiction of the regulatory commission in entertaining the tariff application filed by either side under the electricity act, 2003 and also the jurisdiction of this appellate tribunal to entertain the appeal as against the said determination by the regulatory commission.on this point, .....

Gajendra Haldea S/O Late Shri Rao Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL203

..... wheeling, be determined under this section by the state commission having jurisdiction in respect of the licensee who intends to distribute electricity and make payment therefor: (6) a tariff order shall, unless amended or revoked, shall continue to be in force for such period as may be specified in the tariff order.35. ..... 2 the government of india has initiated several reform measures to create a favourable environment for addition of new generating capacity in the country. the electricity act 2003 has put in place a highly liberal framework for generation. there is no requirement of licensing for generation. the requirement of techno-economic clearance ..... thus, it is clear from a reading of section 64(1) of the act that an application for determination of tariff can only be made under section 62. but section 62(1) only prescribes determination of tariff for: (a) supply of electricity .....

Shree Dhanvarsha Steels (Pvt.) Vs. Uttaranchal Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL1341

..... (c) while re-determining the tariff the commission shall ensure that no tariff shock is caused to any other category of consumers in consonance with the spirit of the electricity act, 2003 and the tariff policy.3. for the year 2006-07, the uerc passed the tariff order on 12.07.2006 which is under challenge in this appeal. ..... charge) and rs.1.90 per kvah energy charge. this tariff was continued in the next year 2004-05. the respondent no.2, uttaranchal power company limited, applied for amendment in the prevailing tariff fixed by the order dated 08.09.2003 so far as it related to the consumers of power intensive industrial units (piu) (only steel units). ..... 1. this appeal is directed against the tariff order, passed by the uttaranchal electricity regulatory commission (uerc/ commission for short), the respondent no.1 dated 12.07.2006 for the period from 01.04.2006 - 31.03.2007, to the extent it relates to the rate schedule-7 (rt-7) applicable to steel units fixing energy charge at the rate .....