Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity amendment act 2007 section 17 amendment of section 153 Court: appellate tribunal for electricity aptel Page 1 of about 196 results (0.335 seconds)

May 30 2011 (TRI)

In the Matter Of: M/S. Tata Steel Limited, Mumbai and Others Vs. Oriss ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... . thus the intention of the parliament in amending the above provisions of the act by removing provision for elimination of cross ..... electricity and also, reduces and eliminates cross subsidies within the period to be specified by the appropriate commission was replaced by the tariff progressively reflects the cost of supply of electricity and also reduces cross subsidies in the manner specified by the appropriate commission by an amendment under electricity (amendment) act, 2007 w.e.f. 15.6.2007 ..... to supply a consumer category. however, it is not the intent of the act after the amendment in the year 2007 (act 26 of 2007) that the tariff should be the mirror image of the cost of supply of electricity to a category of consumer. 18. section 62(2) provides for the factors .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 31 2013 (TRI)

Kerala High Tension and Extra High Tension Industrial Electricity Cons ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

..... . thus the intention of the parliament in amending the above provisions of the act by removing provision for elimination of cross ..... electricity and also, reduces and eliminates cross subsidies within the period to be specified by the appropriate commission was replaced by the tariff progressively reflects the cost of supply of electricity and also reduces cross subsidies in the manner specified by the appropriate commission by an amendment under electricity (amendment) act, 2007 w.e.f. 15.6.2007 ..... various cases. 47. the findings of the tribunal in the various cases are summarized as under keeping in view the amendment made in the electricity act, 2003 in the year 2007: i) the pooled power purchase cost from all sources of supply to the distribution licensee has to be used for .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 2010 (TRI)

Chhattisgrh State Power Distribution Co. Ltd Vs. Hira Ferro Alloys Ltd ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... : provided also that the state commission shall, not later than five years from the date commencement of the electricity (amendment) act ,2003 (57 of 2003) by regulations, provide such open access to all consumers who require a supply of electricity where the maximum power to be made available at any time exceeds one megawatt. 26. from a conjoint ..... rril) through dedicated feeders. the commission initiated suo motu proceedings under section 142 of the electricity act, 2003 (the act in short) in petition 27 of 2007. by an order dated 15.02.2008, the commission found violation of the act and the chhatisgarh state electricity regulatory commission (licence) regulation 2004, and imposed penalty of rs. one lakh, and directed ..... dated 27.08.2008 holding inter- alia, that it had the jurisdiction to entertain the petition as already decided in the order dated 13.11.2007 passed in petition no. 37 of 2006 wherein it was held that since permission for open access under sections 39, 40 and 42(2) of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 2008 (TRI)

Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. Vs. the Chhattisgarh State

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... also that the state commission shall, not later than five years from the date of commencement of the electricity (amendment) act, 2003 (57 of 2003) by regulations, provide such open access to all consumers who require a supply of electricity where the maximum power to be made available at any time exceeds one megawatt. 2(47) "open ..... accordance of provisions of this act and rules and regulations made thereunder and to any consumer subject to ..... of bombay and the supreme court in the maharashtra state electricity board case (supra). it is also our duty to point out that section 9 has since undergone a change in 2007. with amendment coming into force, no license is required under the act for supply of electricity generated from a captive generating plant to any licensee in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2005 (TRI)

Sri Vasavl Industries Ltd. Vs. West Bengal Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2005)LCAPTEL1127

..... january, 2004, which provides that the state commission shall not later than five years from the date of commencement of the electricity (amendment) act, 2003 provide open access to all consumers, who require supply of electricity where the maximum power to be made available at any time exceeds 1 mw.5. in order to appreciate the point ..... also that the state commission shall, not later than five years from the date of commencement of the electricity (amendment) act, 2003 (57 of 2003) by regulations, provide such open access to all consumers who require a supply of electricity where the maximum power to be made available at any time exceeds one megawatt. (3) where any ..... is required to provide open access to all consumers, who require supply of electricity where maximum power to be made available at any time exceeds 1 mw, not later than 5 years from the date of commencement of the electricity (amendment) act, 2003. the amendment act came into force w.e.f. 27th january, 2004. therefore, the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 2011 (TRI)

M/S Noida Power Company Limited, Commercial Complex Vs. Paschimanchal ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... the requirement of minimum area for grant of distribution license finds mention only under the explanation given in the rules, 2005. since under the provisions of the electricity (amendment) act, 2003 the scope of application of proviso has been restricted only to defining the additional requirement of capital adequacy, credit worthiness and code of conduct, the ..... area for grant of distribution licence finds mention only in the explanation of rule 3 (2) given in the rule 2005. since under the provisions of the electricity amendment act, 2003, scope of application of prudency has been restricted only to defining additional requirements of capital adequacy, credit worthiness and code of conduct. therefore, the requirement ..... board, mussoorie (1985) 2 scc 16 at para 7; (iii) lic v-escorts (1986) 1 scc para 61 to 63 (iv) puravankara projects ltd v-venus international (2007) 10 scc 33 para 18, 19, 22, 24, 30, 37; (v) atlas cycle industries ltd-v-state of haryana (1979) 2 scc 196 paras 19-22, 32. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2010 (TRI)

Sitapuram Power Limited and Another Vs. Transmission Corporation of An ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... provided also that the state commission, not later than five years from the date of commencement of the electricity (amendment) act, 2003 (57 of 2003) by regulations, provide such open access to all consumers who require a supply of electricity where the maximum power to be made available at any time exceeds one megawatt. 44. however, ..... all consumers who require a supply of electricity where the maximum power to be made available at any time exceeds one megawatt. 29. section ..... provided to a person who has established a captive generating plant for carrying the electricity to the destination of his own use. provided also that the state commission shall not later than five years from the date of commencement of the electricity (amendment) act, 2003 (57 of 2003) by regulations, provide such open access to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2007 (TRI)

Universal Cables Limited and Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... to tariff difference and possibility of suppression of maximum demand on account paralleling.5. the controversy has become simple by the amendment in section 9 of the electricity act 2003 caused by the electricity (amendment) act 2007 dated 28.05.2007 which came into force on 15.06.2007. section 9, which deals with captive generation, now has the following proviso: provided further that no licence shall be required ..... under this act for supply of electricity generated from a captive generating plant to any licensee in accordance with the provisions of this act and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2011 (TRI)

In the Matter Of: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company L ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... exceeds one megawatt. there is a mandate under the law to provide such open access not later than five years from the date of commencement of the electricity (amendment) act, 2003.(iii) sub-section (3) of section 42 mandates a distribution licensee to grant open access to its distribution system as and when any person ..... a supply of electricity where the maximum power to be made available at any time exceeds one megawatt. (3) where any person, ..... to a person who has established a captive generating plant for carrying the electricity to the destination of his own use: provided also that the state government shall, not later than five years from the date of commencement of the electricity (amendment) act, 2003, by regulations, provide such open access to all consumers who require .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 2009 (TRI)

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Through Its Chairman Vs. Sas Hotels and E ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... all consumers who require a supply of electricity where the maximum power to be made available at any time exceeds one megawatt.] 11) the aforesaid ..... provided to a person who has established a captive generating plant for carrying the electricity to the destination of his own use: [provided also that the state commission shall, not later than five years from the date of commencement of the electricity (amendment) act, 2003 (57 of 2003) by regulations, provide such open access to ..... surplus portion of the power offered by respondent no.1. the terms and conditions of the agreement entered into under section 44 of the electricity (supply) act 1948 were amenable to amendment from time to time. the appellant had right to withdraw the approval given, without assigning any reason and without any liability to pay .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //