Drawing - Judgment Search Results

K.C.P. Limited Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2009)25VST92(All)

bharati sapru j 1 heard sri bharat ji agarwal learned senior counsel assisted by sri piyush agrawal learned counsel for...

Pradeep Kumar Jaiswal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court: Chhattisgarh

Reported in: 2010CriLJ545

sunil kumar sinha j 1 these appeals have been directed against the judgment and order dated 3 2 2003 passed...

Albert Tirkey Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court: Chhattisgarh

Reported in: 2010(1)MPHT61(CG)

ordersatish k agnihotri j 1 with the consent of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner the petition is heard finally...

Microfibres Inc. Vs. Girdhar and Co. and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: LC2009(2)229; 2009(40)PTC519(Del)

..... of artistic works and have independent existence by themselves as opposed to technical engineering drawings solely created for the purposes of production of a corresponding product which were no ..... product nevertheless does not provide any copyright protection to the intermediate stages such as drawing painting moulding h once an artistic work extinguishes it loses the protective cover of .....

Bartlett Vs. Strickland

Court: US Supreme Court

..... carolina constitution s whole county provision prohibiting the general assembly from dividing counties when drawing its own legislative districts in 1991 the legislature drew house district 18 to ..... creating opportunity districts but the plurality has it precisely backwards a state will inevitably draw some crossover districts as the natural byproduct of districting based on traditional factors .....

Romania Versus Ukraine

Court: International Court of Justice ICJ

..... for the reasons set out above the government of romania respectfully requests the court to draw a single maritime boundary dividing the continental shelf and the exclusive economic zones of romania ..... continental shelf and the exclusive economic zone and the issue of identifying base points for drawing an equidistance median line for the purpose of delimiting the continental shelf and the exclusive .....

Merind Ltd. and anr. Vs. Prescribed Authority (Under Payment of Wages ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2009)IVLLJ120All

..... opinion if the competent legislature itself has expressly excluded the employees drawing the wages over and above rs 1600 per month from ..... of such labour laws the class of sales promotion employees drawing such wages shall be excluded from applicability of such labour ..... capacity or iv who being employed in a supervisory capacity draws wages exceeding one thousand six hundred rupees per mensem or .....

Tomy Zacharias Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Minis ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

..... basis so that the increased pay would benefit the applicant in drawing some additional pension and terminal benefits 7 counsel for the ..... 2000 could the applicant observe this anomalous situation of junior drawing more pay and hence moved his representation vide annexure a ..... junior being promoted appointed to the higher post earlier the junior draws higher pay than the senior the senior may be on .....

Jasvinder Pal Singh and Others Vs. the Divisional Railway Manager, Sou ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

..... departmental candidates this may result in the departmental promotee s drawing less pay than a direct recruit junior to him this ..... instruction ii supra the private respondents were junior and were drawing higher pay due to adhoc promotion therefore the seniors pay ..... adhoc basis before they were given regular promotion and are drawing more pay than the applicants on regular promotion the applicants .....

Sanjeev Nanda Vs. the State

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 160(2009)DLT775

..... undermining the fair name and standing of the judges as impartial and independent adjudicators 61 drawing strength from the said decision counsel submitted that in similar circumstances the trial court had ..... as highlighted above the inevitable conclusion is that section 304a has no application 208 while drawing the distinction even between rash act and negligent act the apex court in bhalachandra .....