Skip to content


Drawing - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: drawing Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 600 results (0.091 seconds)
Oct 20 2004 (TRI)

Siddharth Warp N. Draw Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-20-2004

Reported in: (2005)(180)ELT254Tri(Mum.)bai

1 after dispensing with the condition of pre deposit of duty and penalty we proceed to dispose of the appeal...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 13 2004 (HC)

R.L. Khashu and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-13-2004

Reported in: 2006(2)SLJ109(Delhi)

manmohan sarin j 1 petitioners 12 in number have filed the present writ petition seeking quashing of the decision of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 10 2004 (HC)

Vikas Jandial and ors. Vs. State of J and K Through Finance Department ...

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: Jun-10-2004

Reported in: 2004(3)JKJ66

..... received after 22nd july 2003 on the prescribed format and were considered in the draw of lots without completion of any formalities notwithstanding whether the applicants were educated unemployed ..... the number of applications received for 205 locations and the applicants participated in the draw of lots the respondents further emphatically refuted the petitioners contention that the state largesse .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 2004 (HC)

State of J and K and ors. Vs. Vikas Jandial and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: Dec-21-2004

Reported in: 2005(2)JKJ451

..... submission of learned counsel for appellants is that the writ petitioners having participated in the draw of lots are precluded from maintaining any challenge to the procedure adopted or procedure ..... reason that the excise commissioner suggested the short listing of applicants through the procedure of draw of lots but at the same time providing preferential treatment to educated unemployed youth .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 28 2004 (FN)

Vieth Vs. Jubelirer

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-28-2004

..... confront two obstacles first is the lack of comprehensive and neutral principles for drawing electoral boundaries no substantive definition of fairness in districting seems to command general ..... the risk of entrenchment is demonstrated where partisan considerations render the traditional district drawing compromises irrelevant where no justification other than party advantage can be found seem .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 17 2004 (HC)

Aeg Aktiengesllschaft Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-17-2004

Reported in: [2004]267ITR209(KAR); [2004]267ITR209(Karn)

..... and in this connection it had prepared certain documents and drawings which were handed over to the indian company and for ..... of information outside india in respect of any data documentation drawing or specification relating to any patent invention model design secret ..... for the purpose of considering the question whether the printed drawings designs and plans imported would attract customs duty is of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 01 2004 (TRI)

Dabhol Power Company Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-01-2004

Reported in: (2004)(97)ECC195

..... for review of the offshore service contractor in addition to the data sheets and drawings therefore the offshore service contractor in addition to providing design and engineering specifications ..... etc there had been continuous interaction between service contractors and vendors in finalizing the drawings required for the manufacture the commissioner has correctly held that no unconnected vendor .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 16 2004 (HC)

Sampanna Kuries (P) Ltd. Vs. Ito

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Sep-16-2004

Reported in: [2004]141TAXMAN615(Ker)

..... words no separate consideration is required for participation in the draw sri balachandran also submitted that the petitioners in o p ..... discount incentives are given to persons who win in the draw conducted pursuant to the scheme there also the counsel submits ..... that there is no independent consideration for the draw in short shri balachandran submitted that the provisions of section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 29 2004 (TRI)

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. All Russia Scientific Research

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-29-2004

Reported in: (2006)98ITD69(Mum.)

..... decision does not lay down the general proposition that consideration for transfer of designs and drawings in all cases is to be treated as consideration for outright sale of such designs ..... agreement the ipl was under an obligation to maintain the confidentiality about the designs and drawings the ipl had an obligation not only to maintain confidentiality but also to make every .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 01 2004 (HC)

Vattekktte Madhavan Nair and anr. Vs. Shipping Corporation of India Lt ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-01-2004

Reported in: 2005(1)BomCR810

..... respondents could not discriminate between officers doing identical work the juniors to the petitioners cannot draw more pay than the petitioners the respondents are therefore guilty of infracting the provisions ..... on the part of the respondents on the ground that the respondents juniors were drawing higher pay emoluments than the petitioners the petitioners pay scales were re fixed pursuant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //