Down Market - Judgment Search Results

Asstt. Cit Vs. Marketeers

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Reported in: (2004)91TTJ(Asr.)708

This appeal by the revenue and the C.O. by the assessee are directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), Jalandhar, dated 16-11-1994, relating to assessment year 1991-92.The only affective ground raised by the department in...

income Tax Officer Vs. Marketers

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Reported in: (2008)114TTJ(Asr.)887

and not of discontinuation of business.2. That facts are that the partnership firm in the name of M/s Marketers was constituted by two partners viz. Shri Mohinder Pal Shoor and his brother Shri Ved Parkash Shoor. The

Agriculture Market Yard Hamalies Union Vs. Agriculture Market Committe ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2008(6)ALD88; 2009(1)ALT203

ORDERV. Eswaraiah, J.1. The petitioner, the Agricultural Market Yard Hamalies Union, questions the action of the Agricultural Market Committee, Yemmiganur of Kurnool District in adding two

D.S. Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Syrus Marketing and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: II(2006)BC367; 128(2006)DLT60; 2006(86)DRJ779

same for recovery of a sum of Rs. 21,11,495/- with interest and costs against the defendants being Syrus Marketing (defendant No. 1) and Sunita Jamwal (defendant No. 2). The latter was sued in the capacity of being

Vishavkarma Motor Market Head Office Barnala Road Vs. Vishavkarma Moto ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R.No.2706 of 2013 Date of Decision:30. 04.2013 Vishavkarma Motor Market, Head Office Barnala Road, Bathinda through its President Amarjit Singh ....Petitioner Versus Vishavkarma Motor Market, Barnala Road, Bathinda

Agriculture Produce Market Committee, through its Chairman Vs. The Hon ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

dated 02.06.2012. The respondent no.3 filed an appeal under provisions of Rule 104 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1967 (for short, the said Rules). The Divisional Joint Registrar held that the respondent

Focus Combine Marketing Pvt Ltd vs.haryana State Cooperative Supply & ...

Court: Delhi

OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h SEPTEMBER, 2019 + FAO92019 and C.M. No.1042/2019 + FOCUS COMBINE MARKETING PVT LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Udit Gupta, Mr. Sidhant Bhatia and Mr. Aditya, Advocates versus HARYANA STATE COOPERATIVE

Agricultural Market Committee Rep. by Its Chairman, Sri Nanga Rajarath ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2008(3)ALD731; 2008(3)ALT115

the second respondent in his Letter No. S1 (3)5959/2005, dated 19-11-2007 in which the acts done by the Market Committee are declared as invalid, withdrawing the cheque power of Chairman as arbitrary, illegal and to pass such

Villiupuram Market Committee, Rep. by Its Special Officer, Vs. K. Seka ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2007)3MLJ666

extension of lease granted in favour of the writ petitioner in respect of the weigh-bridge in the Villupuram Market Committee in the extension order dated 3.4.2006.2. In the Villapuram Market area, a weigh-bridge was stated to have

Agricultural Produce Market Committee Through Its Secretary Vs. Vittha ...

Court: Mumbai

which the impugned order came to be passed. After this complaint was filed, on 19-7-1997 the Agriculture Produce Market Committee at Hinganghat was bifurcated into two Committees - the petitioner-Committee at Hinganghat and respondent No. 3-Committee at