Skip to content


Doing - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: doing Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 338 results (0.176 seconds)
Jun 17 2004 (FN)

Regina Vs. Special Adjudicator (Respondent) Ex Parte Ullah (Fc) (Appel ...

Court: House of Lords

Decided on: Jun-17-2004

lord bingham of cornhill my lords 1 the primary issue in these appeals brought by leave of the court of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 25 2004 (TRI)

Kinjal Electricals (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-25-2004

Reported in: (2004)(96)ECC238

1 in these 3 appeals filed by m s kinjal electricals pvt ltd the issue involved is whether they are...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 29 2004 (TRI)

Photodeal Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-29-2004

Reported in: (2004)(96)ECC281

1 appellants one and two imported four consignments of cameras during 1996 97 at chennai from hong kong the goods...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 26 2004 (TRI)

Shakshambana Silk Exports (P) Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Mar-26-2004

Reported in: (2004)(96)ECC422

..... rendered to on which the claim has been rejected the commissioner was not justified in doing so in view of the fact that the evidence had been produced he referred to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 26 2004 (TRI)

Maharaja Sathyam Spinning Mills Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Mar-26-2004

Reported in: (2004)(173)ELT309Tri(Chennai)

1 this appeal by the appellant assessee is directed against order in appeal no 11 2003 ce slm dated 31...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 26 2004 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Anupam Engineers

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-26-2004

..... order and remand the matter back to the commissioner to decide the matter afresh while doing so the commissioner is required to take into consideration our finding in para 7 of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 25 2004 (TRI)

Joe Felix D'Souza, Deepak Vs. Commissioner Of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-25-2004

Reported in: (2004)(177)ELT950Tri(Mum.)bai

1 after hearing both sides for some time on the applications for waiver of pre deposit of duty and penalties...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 25 2004 (TRI)

Dab Exports and ors. Vs. Cc and Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-25-2004

Reported in: (2004)(94)ECC221

whether for the period 1 4 1997 31 3 2002 the policy circular no 32 re 99 1999 2000 dated...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 2004 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Matrix Laboratories Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Mar-23-2004

Reported in: (2004)(169)ELT111Tri(Bang.)

1 this appeal is filed by the revenue against order in appeal no 195 2001 h i c e dated...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 29 2004 (TRI)

A. Desai and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-29-2004

Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT342Tri(Mum.)bai

..... that such a discrepancy is enough to raise an initial presumption against the assessee by doing so the department shifts the burden on to the assessee to prove that the goods .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //