Doctrinally - Judgment Search Results

American Trucking Ass'ns Vs. Smith

Court: US Supreme Court

..... scheme represented a clear break from prior precedent this is inconsistent with our nonretroactivity doctrine and would work real and inequitable hardships in many cases petitioners further argue that ..... circumstances we ruled that our interpretation that the act did not incorporate the admiralty doctrine would not apply retroactively to bar the plaintiff s suit remedial considerations were .....

Kirkpatrick and Co. Vs. Evtl. Tectonics

Court: US Supreme Court

..... activities of foreign governments could sufficiently touch on national nerves that the act of state doctrine or related principles of abstention would appropriately be found to bar the suit id at ..... the obligation to decide cases and controversies properly presented to them the act of state doctrine does not establish an exception for cases and controversies that may embarrass foreign governments but .....

MaislIn Indus. Vs. Primary Steel

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the circumstances including equitable defenses to determine if strict adherence to the filed rate doctrine would constitute an unreasonable practice ibid citation omitted because the courts of appeals have ..... than the courts should have primary responsibility for administration of the statute the filed rate doctrine was regarded in significant part as a means for ensuring that this allocation of .....

North Dakota Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... it iv the conclusion that the labeling regulation does not violate the intergovernmental immunity doctrine does not end the inquiry into whether the regulation impermissibly interferes with federal activities ..... and other tax cases was never intended to delineate the full scope of the doctrine the california regulation could not have been characterized as discriminatory carriers were permitted to .....

investment Trust of India Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Reported in: (1991)37ITD100(Mad.)

..... on revenue account and consequently was not revenue deductible secondly the doctrine of merger was not applicable to that case in that ..... to the respective statutory provisions and not with reference to the doctrine of merger total or partial 40 it will be seen ..... had been already considered and decided by the appellate authorities the doctrine of merger would intervene otherwise not 42 we may now .....

Horton Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... justice marshall joins dissenting i remain convinced that justice stewart correctly articulated the plain view doctrine in coolidge v new hampshire 403 u s 443 1971 the fourth amendment permits law ..... protects privacy interests in order to eliminate a generally accepted element of the plain view doctrine that has caused no apparent difficulties for law enforcement officers i am confident however that .....

Dowling Vs. U.S.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... not violate the collateral estoppel component of the double jeopardy clause the collateral estoppel doctrine prohibits the government from relitigating an issue of ultimate fact that has been determined ..... forced petitioner to defend against charges for which he had already been acquitted the doctrine of criminal collateral estoppel grounded in the double jeopardy clause should have prohibited the .....

United States Vs. Dalm

Court: US Supreme Court

..... so as to permit in effect the equitable tolling of a limitations period a doctrinal innovation that appears imaginative may however be nothing more than the necessary expression of ..... were treated equitably under some circumstances congress must have intended to gut judicially created doctrines which ensured equitable treatment for twice taxed citizens under other circumstances the contrary inference .....

Walton Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 481 u s at 481 u s 304 this second doctrine counter doctrine would be a better word has completely exploded whatever ..... court s most cavalier application today of longstanding eighth amendment doctrines developed over the course of two decades of careful and ..... as little interference as possible from our established eighth amendment doctrine footnote 2 1 justice scalia s separate opinion dismissing the .....

Employment Div. Vs. Smith.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of religion means first and foremost the right to believe and profess whatever religious doctrine one desires thus the first amendment obviously excludes all governmental regulation of religious beliefs ..... of the first amendment but must also disregard our consistent application of free exercise doctrine to cases involving generally applicable regulations that burden religious conduct page 494 u s .....