Doctrinally - Year 1960 - Judgments

Apr 04 1960 (SC)

The Chartered Bank, Bombay Vs. the Chartered Bank Employees' Union

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-04-1960

Reported in: AIR1960SC919; [1960(1)FLR34]; (1960)IILLJ222SC; [1960]3SCR441

..... s b sinha dr m k sharma jj amendment or modification of decree applicability of doctrine of ratification held the submission that by reason of conduct of the appellant she would ..... evidence act 1872 section 115 s b sinha dr m k sharma jj applicability of doctrine of estoppel election approbate or reprobate held it is subject to exceptions there is no .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 14 1960 (SC)

NaraIn Das Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-14-1960

Reported in: AIR1961SC181; 1961CriLJ317; [1961]1SCR676

..... art 13 does not necessarily militate against the application of the doctrine of waiver in respect of the provisions contained in part iii ..... one formulated in the abstract as to the applicability of that doctrine to fundamental rights and such applicability must depend on 1 the ..... indian and the american constitutions that could make the doctrine of waiver applicable to the one and not to the other .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 19 1960 (SC)

Shoorji Vallabhdas and Co., Bombay Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax/ ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-19-1960

Reported in: AIR1960SC1162; (1961)63BOMLR201; [1960]39ITR775(SC); [1960]3SCR557

..... jurisdiction of the civil court would be barred would not be correct the application of doctrine of prospective overruling may not be correct because either a court has the requisite ..... jurisdiction the same would be nullity and thus the doctrine of prospective overruling shall not apply in such cases even otherwise doctrine of prospective overruling has a limited application it ordinarily .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 14 1960 (HC)

B. Gangaiah Vs. D.P. Gangadharan

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Apr-14-1960

Reported in: AIR1961Kant178; AIR1961Mys178

..... gowda jj res judicata held section 11 is not exhaustive of res judicata application of doctrine is not restricted to c p c but extends to all litigations including industrial cases ..... 11 is to be read in harmony with explanation 8 doctrine is founded on consideration of high public policy and said doctrine applies also between two stages in same litigation and 3 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 30 1960 (HC)

S. Narayanappa and Brothers Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Mysore

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Nov-30-1960

Reported in: [1961]41ITR125(KAR); [1961]41ITR125(Karn)

..... does not permit a person to both approbate and reprobate which principle is based on doctrine of election indian contract act 9 of 1872 section 10 s r bannurmath a n ..... does not permit a person to both approbate and reprobate which principle is based on doctrine of election after the income tax officer completed his assessment under section 23 4 of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 07 1960 (HC)

Kochunni Kartha and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Nov-07-1960

Reported in: AIR1961Ker210

..... acts special enactment repugnant to general act passed subsequently both provision cannot remain in force doctrine of necessary implication applies special enactment becomes invalid by virtue of provisions of general act .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 20 1960 (SC)

Anwarkhan Mahboob Co. Vs. the State of Bombay (Now Maharashtra) and or ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-20-1960

Reported in: AIR1961SC213; [1961]1SCR709; [1960]11STC698(SC)

..... his sons and family members of his brother would be owners of 2nd floor held doctrine of family settlement will apply in such case will should be given a broad construction .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 14 1960 (SC)

State of Bihar Vs. Kripa Shankar Jaiswal

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-14-1960

Reported in: AIR1961SC304; 1961CriLJ447; [1961(2)FLR321]; (1961)ILLJ334SC; [1961]2SCR1

..... his sons and family members of his brother would be owners of 2nd floor held doctrine of family settlement will apply in such case will should be given a broad construction .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 22 1960 (SC)

Homi Jehangir Gheesta Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-22-1960

Reported in: AIR1961SC1135; [1961]41ITR135(SC); [1961]1SCR770

..... society truly based on social equality will be attained under the powerful impact of the doctrine of social justice and equality proclaimed by the constitution and sought to be implemented by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 08 1960 (HC)

Mahadeo Prosad Shaw Vs. Calcutta Dyeing and Cleaning Co.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-08-1960

Reported in: AIR1961Cal70

..... force independent of any implied contract between the parties mr sen therefore submits that the doctrine of frustration being firmly established in our country as under section 56 of the indian ..... bombay high court reported in air1950bom89 tarabai jivanlal v padamchand he therefore submits that the doctrine of frustration has no application to leases and the restitution was correctly allowed by both .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Doctrinally - Judgment Search Results