Docking - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: docking Year: 2008 Page 1 of about 601 results (0.082 seconds)Mazgaon Dock Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-29-2008
..... refitting and overhauling of machinery from the principle contractor like mazagaon docks ltd etc for such purposes they have been given vendor ..... account of vagaries of sea and for the subject purposes dry docks and workshops are established in the port for the purposes ..... for obtaining a licence for carrying out the work in dry dock such contractors must have facility such as enough number of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEic Holdings Limited Vs. Calcutta Dock Labour Board
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-04-2008
Reported in: 2008(3)CHN311
..... 700069 including flat nos 1d 1g 1i 2a 3d and 5a thereof and the calcutta dock labour board for short cdlb has been occupying an area covering a total area of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCalcutta Dock Labour Board Vs. Eic Holdings Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-03-2008
Reported in: (2008)IVCALLT159(HC)
ashim kumar banerjee j 1 at all material times calcutta dock labour board hereinafter referred to as cdlb was a tenant in respect of premises no .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDockyard Employees Union Vs. Mazgaon Dock Ltd.,
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-12-2008
Reported in: [2009(121)FLR1068]
f i rebello j 1 rule heard forthwith 2 petitioner is a trade union registered under the provisions of the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSunil Ramchandra Kedia Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-10-2008
Reported in: 2009(3)BomCR397
deshmukh d k j 1 admit heard finally by consent of the parties 2 controversy in the appeal relates to...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSchreder S.a and anr. Vs. Twinkle Luminaries Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2008
Reported in: AIR2008Delhi137; 150(2008)DLT187; 2008(103)DRJ588; LC2008(3)184; 2008(37)PTC343(Del)
badar durrez ahmed j 1 the plaintiff no 1 is a company which has been incorporated in belgium and engaged...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSks Logistics (i) Limited a Company Incorporated Under the Provisions ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-01-2008
Reported in: 2008(6)BomCR14; (2008)110BOMLR3445
..... have been loading unloading containers at berth 14 on the victoria dock the petitioners are not container terminal operator the said berth has ..... of containers mr singh submitted that berth no 14 at victoria docks has already been allotted to the petitioners and now the ..... between vessels in the port and the wharves piers quays or docks belonging to or in the possession of the board b receiving .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChairman, Chennai Port Trust Vs. Presiding Officer, C.G.i.T. Cum Labou ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2008
Reported in: (2009)ILLJ712Mad; (2009)2MLJ46
..... operation and handling of such labour were originally covered by two schemes known as madras dock workers regulation of employment scheme 1956 otherwise called as registered scheme and the madras ..... withdrawing its operation as stevedoring company the third respondent addressed a communication to the madras dock labour board dated february 20 1992 stating that they have lost major portion of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBabu Roy and ors. Vs. State of W.B.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-13-2008
..... put up in the tata safari vehicle k shiba is present on accd dock k shiba is identified on dock after riding tata safary car k shiba shouted manas ko murder ker ..... of those three named persons only b rambabu is present in accd dock witness identifies the accd b rambabu on dock after sometime i suddenly heard a hue and cry and i .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income Tax, Madras Vs. Ponni Sugars and Chemicals Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-16-2008
Reported in: [2008]306ITR392(SC); 2008(12)SCALE570; 2008(9)SCC337
..... lords held that the financial assistance given to the company for dock extension cannot be regarded as a trade receipt it was found ..... with the trading of the company because the work undertaken was dock extension according to the house of lords the assistance in the ..... payment was to curtail obliterate unemployment and since the purpose was dock extension the house of lords held that the payment made was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial