Docking - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: docking Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 600 results (0.161 seconds)Chennai Port and Dock Workers Congress (intuc), (Food Corporation of I ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2002
Reported in: [2002(94)FLR1072]; (2002)IIILLJ194Mad
k p sivasubramaniam j 1 today the matter is listed for being mentioned in my order dated 21 02 2002...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMazagaon Dock Limited Vs. Engineering Workers Union
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-04-2002
Reported in: [2002(95)FLR1005]; (2002)IIILLJ815Bom
r j kochar j 1 the petitioner a government of india undertaking under the ministry of defence is a company...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMark Auto Indus. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2002
Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT311TriDel
..... the goods imported by them directly to the appellants from the docks on the basis of endorsement duly countersigned by the appraiser icd ..... be used in his factory ii imported goods lying in customs dock area bonded warehouse are diverted to manufacturing units in whose ..... present matter 4 where the imported goods are still in customs dock area and the manufacturer importer decides to divert transfer the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome Tax Officer Vs. Shreyas Shipping Ltd.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-24-2002
Reported in: (2003)86ITD556(Mum.)
..... adjustment of part disallowance of the assessee s claim of dry dock expenses was deleted on receipt of this order under section 154 ..... assessee submitted that it was the industrial practice that the dry dock and special survey expenses were charged to the books of accounts ..... case it is obvious that the assessee has rightly charged dry dock and special survey expenses to the books of accounts in three .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTito Vs. Shreyas Shipping Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: May-24-2002
Reported in: (2002)76TTJ(Mumbai)11
..... adjustment of part disallowance of the assessee s claim of dry dock expenses was deleted on receipt of this order under section 154 ..... assessee submitted that it was the industrial practice that the dry dock and special survey expenses were charged to the books of accounts ..... case it is obvious that the assessee has rightly charged dry dock and special survey expenses to the books of accounts in three .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBoard of Trustees of the Madras Port Trust, Rep. by Its Chairman, Madr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2002
Reported in: 2003(151)ELT290(Mad)
..... published in three consecutive issues of the official gazette declare that such dock berth wharf quay stage jetty or pier is ready for receiving ..... or hazardous goods would not be permitted to warehouse in the dock and as such nothing of such nature of goods have been ..... warehoused this admission of the dock manager of the port trust go to falsify the theory of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindusthan Paper Corporation Ltd. Vs. Wellbrines Chemicals Private Ltd ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-07-2002
Reported in: (2002)3CALLT114(HC)
..... 12 1991 as the petitioner failed to bring sufficient cargo to haldia docks the learned counsel submitted that this is clear from the admission of ..... as the total quantity of coal was not available on the loading dock and that is the reason why they did not apply for ..... used unless it is covered by an express stipulation thus where the dock authorities refused to allow a ship to come to a loading berth .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCit Vs. Kanyakumari Distt. Co-op. Spg. Mills Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-31-2002
Reported in: [2003]128TAXMAN544(Mad)
..... considering a case of grant from an unemployment grants committee to the dock company and the house of lords held that the grants were ..... the following observation of the house of lords in the seaham harbour dock co s case supra is relevant for the purpose of this ..... kept in employment and it was paid to and received by the dock company without any special allocation to any particular part of their .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelux Carpet Co. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-29-2002
Reported in: (2002)(146)ELT80Tri(Mum.)bai
..... were cleared and seeking confiscation of the goods lying in the docks in terms of section 111 o of the customs act 1962 ..... there was however no proposal for confiscation of the goods lying in docks proposals for imposition of penalty was made upon delux carpet co ..... confirming the duty as shown above confiscating the goods lying in the docks in terms of section 111 d and imposing penalties of rs .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. Vs. Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-10-2002
Reported in: 2003(90)ECC875
..... from the said container was stolen from the bombay port trust docks and taken to delhi where it was put on sale on ..... the port trust located an open empty container off berth 13a indira dock with some identification marks obliterated later on it was confirmed that ..... also show that the said container was ultimately located at indira docks and the goods contained therein were sold at delhi in this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial