Dim - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: dim Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 12,617 results (0.074 seconds)Tulabala SardarIn and Dinbandhu Singh Sardar @ Dinbandhu Singh Vs. Sta ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-10-2002
Reported in: 2003(51)BLJR146; [2003(1)JCR296(Jhr)]
lakshman uraon j 1 both the appeals have been preferred by the appellants named above against the judgment and order...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTResidents of Tatta Pani Vs. State of H.P. and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-11-2002
Reported in: AIR2002HP122
kamlesh sharma a c j 1 both these writ petitions c w p nos 220 of 2000 and 1359 of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDharyashil Alias Pampi Mahadevrao Ghatge Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-18-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ317
v k tahilramani j 1 through this appeal the appellant is challenging the judgment and order dated 13 12 1996...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishna Bihar Pandey and ors. Vs. State
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jul-30-2002
b n p singh j 1 on being tried by the 1st additional sessions judge buxar while din dayal pandey...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTH.P. State Forest Corporation Ltd. Vs. Charan Singh and Company
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2002
Reported in: 2003(3)ARBLR659(HP)
lokeshwar singh panta j 1 this appeal under section 39 of the arbitration act 1940 hereinafter for short the act...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJimmy R. Jagtiani and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-03-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2397
orderj s khehar j 1 sanjay patial claims to be a taekwondo enthusiast he is registered player for the aforesaid...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBell Vs. Cone
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-28-2002
bell v cone 535 u s 685 2002 october term 2001 syllabus bell warden v cone certiorari to the united...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTContinental Construction Ltd. Vs. Tehri Hydro Development Corpn. Ltd. ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-05-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC3134; 2002(3)ARBLR255(SC); 99(2002)DLT576(SC); [2003(1)JCR16(SC)]; JT2002(6)SC467; 2002(6)SCALE210; (2002)8SCC177
rajendra babu j 1 this petition is directed against an order made by the high court of delhi in writ...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGujarat State Fertilizers and Vs. Commr. of Cus.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-18-2002
Reported in: (2002)(146)ELT547Tri(Mum.)bai
1 this is an appeal filed by the appellant against the decision of the commissioner of customs appeals mumbai classifying...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtkins Vs. Virginia
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-20-2002
juries or judges are unable to account properly for the diminished capacities of the retarded the first assumption is wrong as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial