Differently - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Shri Ram Piston and Rings Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(107)ELT380TriDel

..... no bar to goods being sold at different prices to different classes of buyers the difference in prices was subject to the condition ..... case the buyers remained the same there cannot be two different prices for the same goods additional collector therefore confirmed the ..... confirmed the demand by holding that msrtc was not a different class of buyer from asrtu setting aside the additional collector .....

Pradeep Alias Pradipta Kumar Mohanty Vs. State of Orissa

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 1999(II)OLR449

..... the present petitioner the accused has collected money from different places on different dates but did not account for the same ..... police stations to carry on the investigation into the different incidents arising within their respective jurisdiction on the basis of ..... same fir may give rise to several prosecutions in different courts which may ultimately prejudice the accused petitioner having regard .....

Jefferson County Vs. Acker

Court: US Supreme Court

..... enjoin suspend or restrain the collection of taxes recognizing that there is little practical difference between an injunction and anticipatory relief in the form of a declaratory judgment the ..... of the northern district of alabama except respondents have paid the county occupational tax on differing percentages of their judicial salaries but neither the administrative office of the united states .....

Jones Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the reasoning of the fifth and tenth circuits would have us reach a quite different proposition that if two aggravating factors are duplicative then the weighing process necessarily is skewed ..... instruction was harmless 494 u s at 753754 emphasis added clemons however involved quite different facts there an especially heinous aggravating factor was determined to be unconstitutionally vague the only .....

Olmstead Vs. L. C.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... discrimination must show that she received differential treatment vis a vis members of a different group on the basis of a statutorily described characteristic thus respondents could demonstrate ..... requires a showing that a claimant received differential treatment visa vis members of a different group on the basis of a statutorily described characteristic this interpretation comports with dictionary .....

College Savings Bank Vs. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Ed. Expense Bd.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... do not help the seminole tribe majority they all focus upon a critically different question namely whether courts acting without legislative support can abrogate state sovereign immunity not ..... say incentive based or decentralized regulatory systems that deliberately take account of local differences by assigning roles powers or responsibility not just to federal administrators but to citizens .....

Carmell Vs. Texas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... alone subvert the presumption of innocence the issue of the admissibility of evidence is simply different from the question whether the properly admitted evidence is sufficient to convict the defendant ..... operative sufficiency rule ante at 552 n 35 this is a distinction without a difference because the normally operative sufficiency rule in question when the prosecution submits no admissible .....

Strickler Vs. Greene

Court: US Supreme Court

..... distinct levels of confidence concerning the hypothetical effects of errors on decisionmakers reasoning the differences among the standards are slight second the gap between all three of those formulations ..... could have wreaked upon stoltzfus as adequate to raise a significant possibility of a different recommendation as sufficient to undermine confidence that the death recommendation would have been .....

Alden Vs. Maine

Court: US Supreme Court

..... had misread the constitution although the dissent attempts to rewrite history to reflect a different original understanding its evidence is unpersuasive the handful of state statutory and constitutional ..... treaties and the diversity jurisdiction to suits between parties claiming lands under grants from different states 4 id at 246 identical amendment proposed by the north carolina convention .....

South Central Bell Telephone Co. Vs. Alabama

Court: US Supreme Court

..... can be said of the circumstances now before us the two relevant cases involve different plaintiffs and different tax years neither is a class action and no one claims that there 168 ..... rejected the claims holding that the special burden imposed on foreign corporations simply offset a different burden imposed exclusively on domestic corporations by alabama s domestic shares tax subsequently south .....