Differently - Judgment Search Results

i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)(62)ECC591

..... is contended that retail prices charged by retailers in different areas were different and the exemption notifications contemplate a single all ..... nos 26 34 and 36 contain 1mrb prices at different places at different times for various itc brands imrb also furnishes ..... forecast prepared by district west and such region wise differences would be natural and inevitable such regional qualification would .....

Agrawal Motors Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jabalpur

Reported in: (1999)68ITD407Jab

..... by the assessing officer that the assessee was issuing different invoices for different purposes i e the invoices issued for bank finance ..... reducing the contractors profit rate disclosed by the assessee the difference remains negligible in view of the above we hold ..... of undisclosed income the deemed income and undisclosed income are different items therefore the deemed income cannot be brought within .....

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1998)(76)LC77Tri(Mum.)bai

..... it is only abroad that the design consideration for passenger carrying vehicles are clearly different such as pneumatic suspension integral body construction and rear engine in the heavier class ..... improvement over the rigid springs the full text of the report is extracted though the differences in fully built vehicles for passenger and goods carrying applications are obvious distinguishing between .....

Vivek Dwivedi and anr. Vs. Prem NaraIn and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1999MP1; 1998(2)MPLJ618

..... of the aforesaid expressions it has been urged that a single application lor different permits for different routes could be entertained 35 we have given our anxious consideration to the ..... having no connection with each other entertaining of a single application for routes covering different areas or different routes in the same area seeking permits for plying stage carriages providing service .....

National Endowment for Arts Vs. Finley

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a spectrum of protected speech extending outward from the core of overtly political declarations put differently art is entitled to full protection because our cultural life just like our native ..... the newspaper it is obvious beyond peradventure that the court would not have come out differently leaving the university free to refuse funding after considering a publication s christian perspective .....

Clinton Vs. City of New York

Court: US Supreme Court

..... change or not to change tariff rates that congress has frequently granted the president any differences being differences in degree not kind see part iv c infra the fact that one could ..... power in that instance on the other hand i must recognize that there are important differences between the delegation before us and other broad constitutionally acceptable delegations to executive branch agencies .....

Monterey Vs. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... question whether del monte dunes was entitled to a jury determination of liability this difference renders the analogy to condemnation proceedings not only unhelpful but also inapposite when ..... generally more onerous to the landowner the disparagement is joined with adoption of a different analogy between inverse condemnation proceedings and actions for tortious interference with property interests .....

Air Line Pilots Vs. Miller

Court: US Supreme Court

..... arbitrator perhaps subject to different discovery requests obtaining somewhat different information hearing different arguments operating under different rules of procedure and evidence and exercising different judgments each without ..... an alternative view u chi legal forum 399 401 1990 describing differences between mandatory non binding arbitration over agency fee calculations and traditional .....

Lewis Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... applies only on federal enclaves so that assimilation of louisiana law would treat enclave residents differently from those living elsewhere in that state by subjecting them to two sets of territorial ..... as murder under 18 u s c 111l louisiana s murder statutes are structured somewhat differently from their federal counterparts but they are still unquestionably murder statutes because that offence is .....

Lunding Vs. New York Tax Appeals Tribunal

Court: US Supreme Court

..... categorically deny personal deductions to a nonresident taxpayer without a substantial justification for the difference in treatment iii in this case new york acknowledges the right of nonresidents ..... business activities or property owned in one particular state than in another an entirely different situation is presented by a facially inequitable and essentially unsubstantiated taxing scheme that .....