Skip to content


Difference - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: difference Sorted by: recent Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.053 seconds)
Dec 31 2001 (TRI)

Deepak Lohia Vs. Kamrup Developers (P.) Ltd.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Dec-31-2001

..... respondent was not in a position to explain the discrepancy due to which disputes and differences between the parties arose to amicably settle the disputes the same were referred to arbitration ..... this stand of the second respondent cannot be sustained inasmuch as there is absolutely no difference in the identity between the second and third respondents as they have been acting together .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2001 (TRI)

Sona Steering Systems Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-31-2001

Reported in: (2003)78TTJ(Delhi)213

..... the purpose of deduction under section 80 i the steering unit and axle units were different industrial units and therefore the assessee was entitled to deduction in respect of steering unit ..... further there is no discussion in the assessment order as to whether there existed two different units functioning independently this factual aspect requires verification further it is clarified that all the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2001 (TRI)

Deepak Lohia Vs. Kamrup Developers Private

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Dec-31-2001

Reported in: (2003)116CompCas188

..... respondent was not in a position to explain the discrepancy due to which disputes and differences between the parties arose to amicably settle the disputes the same were referred to arbitration ..... this stand of the second respondent cannot be sustained inasmuch as there is absolutely no difference in the identity between the second and third respondents as they have been acting together .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2001 (HC)

Himachal Road Transport Corporation Vs. Saroj Devi and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-31-2001

Reported in: 2002ACJ1146

..... awarded by the tribunal 15 keeping in view the aforesaid decisions of supreme court and different high courts including this court we feel that there being no prohibition in law i .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2001 (HC)

Subhash Arora Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-31-2001

Reported in: [2002]82ITD346(Delhi)

..... two separate persons and the value of the assets for transfer exchange must also be different the learned counsel also placed reliance on the decision of the supreme court in the ..... impugned order passed by commissioner appeals in the case of present assessed and had specifically differed from the conclusions arrived at in that order in the opposition the learned departmental representative .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2001 (TRI)

Subhash Arora Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-31-2001

..... the value of the assets for transfer exchange must also be different the learned counsel also placed reliance on the decision of the ..... cit a in the case of present assessee and had specifically differed from the conclusions arrived at in that order in the opposition ..... another company was realisation of shares of first company and the difference between the price of shares of the first company and the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2001 (TRI)

Subhash Arora Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-31-2001

Reported in: (2002)82ITD345(Delhi)

..... the value of the assets for transfer exchange must also be different the learned counsel also placed reliance on the decision of the ..... cit a in the case of present assessee and had specifically differed from the conclusions arrived at in that order in the opposition ..... another company was realisation of shares of first company and the difference between the price of shares of the first company and the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2001 (TRI)

Satnam Singh Chhabra Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Decided on: Dec-31-2001

..... of deposits dates against the figures reveal that these have been made either in different hand or on different occasions since the document was not sealed after its seizure and was kept .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2001 (HC)

Puri Bros. Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: Dec-31-2001

Reported in: [2002]122TAXMAN82(NULL)

..... samadhan scheme of 1998 was enforced according to the petitioner under this scheme there was difference vis a vis penalty and immunity from prosecution on payment of arrears of tax at .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2001 (TRI)

Madhuvana House Building Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Decided on: Dec-31-2001

..... by purchase or otherwise form residential layouts and allot sites therein to its members with different contractors as under with reference to projects at sl nos 2 4 and 5 above .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //