Did - Year 2002 - Judgments

Jan 01 2002 (TRI)

Mangalore Refinery and Vs. C.C.E., Bangalore

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jan-01-2002

Reported in: (2002)(141)ELT247Tri(Bang.)

..... was raised before the hon ble tribunal in the cochin refineries case the appellants therein did not controvert the same as already held by the hon ble tribunal and in respectful .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 05 2002 (TRI)

Fairdeal Engg. Corpn. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-05-2002

Reported in: (2002)(142)ELT370TriDel

..... considering their prayer for waiver of the pre deposit of the duty and penalty amounts did not arise no mistake on the face of the final order of the tribunal can .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. Oswal Petrochemicals Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-07-2002

Reported in: (2002)(144)ELT217TriDel

..... the furnace which shows the rate of flow at a given point of time and did not indicate the total flow during a particular period as the flow meter was not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 2002 (TRI)

Colt Cables Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-06-2002

Reported in: (2002)(104)LC814Tri(Mum.)bai

..... appeals has erred in dismissing the appeal of the assessee on the ground that they did not challenge the classification issue by filing an appeal against the approval of the classification .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 2002 (TRI)

Cce Vs. Ipf Vikram India Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-07-2002

Reported in: (2002)(103)LC381Tri(Delhi)

..... credit of the disputed amount they were however served with show cause notice that they did not show any wastage either in rt 12 returns or in rt 23a part i ..... india wherein it had been observed by the hon ble high court that modvat scheme did not emphasis that during manufacturing process entire duty paid inputs must be actually consumed but .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 2002 (TRI)

Cincinati Milacron Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Acc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-06-2002

Reported in: (2002)LC383Tri(Mum.)bai

..... a hybrid machine consisting of both analogue and digital systems 3 although the dy commissioner did not say and the commissioner appeals attributed to him the exclusion clause in the sub .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 2002 (TRI)

B.L. Kalucha Vs. Commissioner of Customs, New

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2002

Reported in: (2002)(142)ELT183TriDel

..... found that the parties from whom the trade enquiries were purported to have been made did not exist and they had not furnished the purported information about price of the cosmetics .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 2002 (TRI)

G.S. Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-06-2002

Reported in: (2002)(144)ELT387TriDel

..... the appellant has also submitted that imposition of penalty was not justified as the case did not involve any contumacious conduct on the part of the appellant and full details of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 05 2002 (TRI)

Procter and Gamble Home Products Vs. Commr. of Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Mar-05-2002

Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC448

..... of valuation as laid down under rule 7a of the said rules the original authority did not accept the very prayer on the ground that the importer m s procter amp ..... the ground that there are no imports of identical similar goods by other importers but did not agree to the deputy commissioner s finding that rule 7a cannot be adopted hence .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2002 (TRI)

M. Square Chemicals Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-08-2002

Reported in: (2002)LC217Tri(Mum.)bai

..... 700 tons of soda ash which it showed as its stock in private records which did not figure in the excise records as its raw materials the proceedings were initiated by ..... made in the books of account the notice to show cause issued in this regard did not cite any evidence other than these facts for its tentative conclusion that the assessee .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Did - Judgment Search Results