Did - Judgment Search Results

Did Frenchisees' Asso. Vs. Chief General Manager

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR2005Guj141; (2004)3GLR2609

..... the tariff for franchised group pbx or pabx and epabx with did facility for multistorey other buildings co operative housing societies is changed ..... under the authority recalled the emphasis given in tto 1999 to did franchisees as a means of expending tele density in the context ..... the prevailing tariffs needed to change for the extension users of did to find the service attractive in comparison to a del .....

Jagabandhu Saha Vs. Hari Mohan Roy, Who Appeared and Chandra Mohan Roy ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 62Ind.Cas.653

..... his petition a peon of the court was directed to deliver possession to him and did actually deliver possession of a portion of this property then the defendants nos 1 6 .....

“learned Counsel Contended That the Police Did Not Add Any New Offen ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... crm not m 458 of 2013 o m 2 learned counsel contended that the police did not add any new offence subsequently the argument inter alia is that the present case .....

“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That in Fact the Petitioner Di ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... court on 17 11 2012 learned counsel inter alia contended that in fact the petitioner did not cause any injury but he has been falsely implicated in the present case by .....

Probodh Chandra Mitter Vs. Harish Chandra Naskar, Who Appeared; and Pa ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 78Ind.Cas.7

..... analogous cases decided by teunon and newbould jj on 25th june 1920 those cases however did not relate to the rent of the 400 bighas covered by the kabuliat in the .....

Tinplate Co. of India Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1983)LC1379DTri(Delhi)

..... withdrawn in 1982 that non indication of the amount of duty did not make the show cause notice invalid 1981 e l t ..... 642 delhi and that the corrigendum did nothing more than correcting an earlier calculation mistake 4 we have ..... involved in the earlier amount was explained to the appellants they did not seriously press for this objection 8 accordingly we hold that the .....

National Mechanical Works Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1983)(14)ELT2370TriDel

..... a hearing the assistant collector of central excise confirmed the demand for differential duty but did not impose any penalty the appellate collector found that the l 6 licence was granted ..... technical 6 the tribunal observes that on purely technical considerations the clearance in this case did not attract the concessional rate of duty unless the l 6 licence had been issued .....

Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1984)(15)ELT161TriDel

..... of notification 116 69 ce because it contained lignocaine hydrochloride an anaesthetic a substance he did not accept was therapeutically inert however he remained silent on the dispute about rolitetracycline intravenous .....

Zoraster and Co. (Supplies) Pvt. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1983)LC1375DTri(Delhi)

..... of the exemption notification and were liable to pay the differential duty the assistant collector did not accept the admissibility of the deductions claimed by the appellants from the gross sale .....

Neelamalai Tea/Coffee Estates Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1983)(14)ELT2426TriDel

..... protest as soon as they felt that their excess clearances had started but the appellants did not do so their refund claim was therefore correctly rejected as time barred by the .....