Developer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: developer Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 543 results (0.031 seconds)M/s. Zodiac Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Krishna Developers Through i ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-24-2016
..... kashyap the appellant defendant no 1 is a private limited company dealing in construction and development activities defendant no 2 is the statutory authority constituted under the maharashtra regional town ..... reads thus 7 simultaneously with the execution of these presents krishna plaintiff has resigned as developer of the juhu hanuman nagar sra 1 co operative housing society ltd further krishna .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Vs. M/S Navodaya Industri ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
..... in cancellation of allotment the said letter precisely reads thus 29 karnataka industrial areas development board a government of karnataka undertaking 14 3 2nd floor r p building nrupathunga ..... the purpose of securing establishment of industrial areas and to promote establishment and orderly development of industries in furtherance of those objects land was offered for allotment to entrepreneurs .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarnataka Industrial Areas Development Board, A Government of Karnatak ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
..... resulted in cancellation of allotment the said letter precisely reads thus karnataka industrial areas development board a government of karnataka undertaking 14 3 2nd floor r p building ..... the purpose of securing establishment of industrial areas and to promote establishment and orderly development of industries in furtherance of those objects land was offered for allotment to entrepreneurs .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarnataka Fisheries Development Corporation Ltd., and Others Vs. The D ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-06-2016
..... that the petitioners have occupied certain portions of the shopping complexes belonging to bangalore development authority as licensees the period of licence is also expired however the petitioners are ..... plaintiff sort to pass declaratory decree s that the communication s of the bangalore development authority as illegal and for grant of permanent injunction against the defendants defendants and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG.S. Developers and Contractors Private Limited Vs. Alpha G. Group Dev ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2016
ia 2317 2016 exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions application stands disposed of arb a comm 07 2016 1...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMontana Developers Private Limited Vs. Aditya Developers and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-22-2016
oral judgment 1 by this petition filed under section 27 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996 for short the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Maya Developers Vs. Neelam R. Thakkar and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-13-2016
..... executed affidavits and looked at the terms of the development agreement maya developers offered an additional area at a stated price over ..... to the provision of housing be it by way of development re development or otherwise is part of the business of a ..... of securing proper implementation of co operative production and other development programmes approved or undertaken by government or to secure the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCitizens Forum for Mangalore Development Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-13-2016
..... regularisation is baseless the karnataka town and country planning regularisation of unauthorised development or constructions rules 2014 specifically provides the conditions for regularisation eligibility violation ..... consideration all these aspects ultimately fixed the regularisation fees of unauthorised 62 development of buildings when the respondent government has taken into consideration the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Bombaywala and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra, through its Secre ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Sep-15-2016
..... such as roads highways parkways railways waterways canals and air ports including their extension and development the development plan prepared under section 21 of the mrtp act generally indicates the manner in which ..... we see these two roads were in existence even before the preparation of the development plan the development plan merely depicted the position existing and it was not a proposal to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCitizens Forum for Mangalore Development, Represented by its Joint Co- ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-13-2016
..... regularisation is baseless the karnataka town and country planning regularisation of unauthorised development or constructions rules 2014 specifically provides the conditions for regularisation eligibility violation ..... into consideration all these aspects ultimately fixed the regularisation fees of unauthorised development of buildings when the respondent government has taken into consideration the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial