Developer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: developer Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.02 seconds)Workmen of the Indian Leaf Tobacco Development Co., Ltd., Guntur Vs. t ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-27-1968
Reported in: AIR1970SC860; [1970(20)FLR269]; [1969]2SCR282
..... andhra pradesh at hyderabad in an industrial dispute between the respondent the indian leaf tobacco development company limited guntur hereinafter referred to as the company and its workmen admittedly the company .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatubha K. Vaghela Vs. Moosa Raza, the District Development Officer
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-21-1968
Reported in: (1969)10GLR23
..... by the panchayat who is appointed as a competent authority to the district development officer or the taluka development officer of the panchayat concerned the delegation would be legal and valid this ..... by the panchayat who is appointed as a competent authority to the district development officer or the taluka development officer of the panchayat concerned the delegation would be legal and valid vyas .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWool Industry Development Co-operative Association Ltd. Vs. Khadi and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-01-1968
Reported in: ILR1968KAR638; (1968)2MysLJ136
..... functions of the commission which included the encouragement of the production of khadi and the development of village industries and research in the technique of the production of khadi section 19 ..... in the exercise of its wisdom considered necessary for the production of khadi and the development of village industries the assistance which the khadi commission may make available in that way .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMansa Nagar Panchayat and anr. Vs. A.K. Chakravarty Dist. Development ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jul-19-1968
Reported in: (1969)10GLR88
..... of the state government in that behalf accordingly the district development officer respondent issued a notification on 3 7 1968 setting ..... the chairman of that panchayat the respondent is the district development officer there the general election was held in december 1963 ..... a noti fication to 15 8 1968 thereafter the district development officer by a notification dated 3 7 1968 has notified .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMetal Box Company of India Ltd. Vs. their Workmen
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-20-1968
Reported in: AIR1969SC612; [1969]39CompCas410(SC); [1969(18)FLR336]; [1969]73ITR53(SC); (1969)ILLJ785SC; [1969]1SCR750
..... expenditure allowable under the income tax act bonus payable to labour provisions for tax development rebate or development allowance and reserves item 2 of schedule ii requires these amounts to be added ..... employees is right 37 in the result the appellant company succeeds on the questions of development rebate and the provision for gratuity amount its appeal on those questions is therefore allowed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGodrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Special Tahsildar, La ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-24-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Mad305
..... applicants to start industries when the petitioner company itself has purchased the lands for developing or expanding their business activities in the south cannot be called acquisition of lands ..... purpose further the state govfernment have allotted plots to various industrialists after acquisition as developed sites ranging from 20 acres to one acre the petitioner company has purchased about .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGodrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Special Tahsil ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-24-1968
Reported in: (1968)2MLJ273
..... applicants to start industries when the petitioner company itself has purchased the lands for developing or expanding their business activities in the south cannot be called acquisition of lands ..... purpose further the state government have allotted plots to various industrialists after acquisition as developed sites ranging from 20 acres to one acre the petitioner company has purchased about .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ellerman Lines Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-10-1968
Reported in: [1970]75ITR47(Cal)
..... passed by the appellate assistant commissioner 7 the other question relates to the allowance of development rebate which the appellate assistant commissioner had ordered to be given it was argued on ..... behalf of the department before the tribunal that since the conditions required for allowance of development rebate were different from the investment allowance in u k the u k ratio certificate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSundaram Motors Private Ltd. and Others Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-25-1968
Reported in: [1969]71ITR587(Mad)
..... machinery or plant may be mobile and ultimately held that development rebate should be restricted having regard to the circumstances in ..... the government of india in 1953 inter alia to recommend a development rebate to the entrepreneurs in industry the enquiry was instituted ..... rebate or marketing their products are not entitled to the development rebate contemplated in clause vib of section 10 2 we .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: the India Electric Works Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-27-1968
Reported in: AIR1970Cal398
..... january 1959 the government of india appointed a committee under the provisions of the industries development and regulation act 1951 to investigate the financial position of the company and on the ..... a company whose managemeut has been taken over by the central government under the industries development and regulation act are not debarred from holding meetings and passing resolution is apparent from .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial