Determine - Judgment Search Results

Fenoplast Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (2002)82ITD178(Hyd.)

..... 2 whether block assessment can be framed where aggregated total income including undisclosed income determined under section 158bc for each assessment years and assessed returned income is loss and ..... 2 whether block assessment can be framed where aggregated total income including undisclosed income determined under section 158bc for each assessment years and assessed returned income is loss and .....

Williams Vs. Taylor, Warden

Court: US Supreme Court

..... virginia supreme court faulted the virginia circuit court for its emphasis on mere outcome determination without proper attention to whether the result of the criminal proceeding was fundamentally unfair ..... supreme court s decision involved an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law as determined by the supreme court of the united states accordingly although i disagree with the .....

Apprendi Vs. New Jersey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... tend to be longer in response congress and the state legislatures shifted to determinate sentencing schemes that aimed to limit judges sentencing discretion and thereby afford similarly ..... a limiting principle that would prevent a legislature with broad authority from transforming jury determined facts that constitute elements of a crime into judgedetermined sentencing factors thereby removing .....

Shalala Vs. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rest upon individual fact related circumstances may all similarly dispute agency policy determinations or may all similarly involve the application interpretation or constitutionality of interrelated ..... immigration statute that barred 1331 challenges to any immigration and naturalization service determination respecting an application for adjustment of status under the special agricultural workers .....

Babu Premarajan Vs. Superintendent of Police, Kasaragode and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR2000Ker417

..... before us that an adjournment is a judicial order since it involves the determination of a ground determination of a sufficient cause for adjournment undoubtedly involves a judicial process of application ..... air 1993 sc 1014 held that high courts have unlimited jurisdiction including jurisdiction to determine their own powers this unlimited jurisdiction has been conferred on the high courts since .....

Arizona Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... future agreement or decree in the event the respective reservations disputed boundaries were finally determined id at 345 the court s 1979 supplemental decree again deferred resolution of ..... concluding that various administrative actions taken by the secretary of the interior constituted final determinations of reservation boundaries for purposes of allocating water rights under the 1964 decree those .....

State of Karnataka Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC1560; JT2000(6)SC1; 1999(4)SCALE332; (2000)9SCC572

..... it is this qualification which affords the true guide for determining whether a particular dispute is comprehended within article 131 ..... of banal rules which are applied under the cpc for determining whether a suit is maintainable article 131 undoubtedly confers ..... agreed to carry out actual field surveys and calculations to determine the extent of submergence under the directions of central water .....

Seling Vs. Young

Court: US Supreme Court

..... conclusively resolve whether a particular scheme is punitive and would thereby prevent a final determination of the scheme s validity under the double jeopardy and ex post facto clauses ..... confinement any consideration of subsequent implementation in the course of making a first instance determination cannot extend to all subsequent implementation but must be limited to implementation of confinement .....

Santaandnbsp;fe Independent School Dist. Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... receive school benefits are constitutionally problematic to the extent the referendum substitutes majority determinations for viewpoint neutrality it would undermine the constitutional protection the program requires the ..... policy in question evolved reflects a device the district put in place that determines whether religious messages will be delivered at home football games the mechanism encourages .....

Weisgram Vs. Marley Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... reproduced below governs motions for judgment as a matter of law in jury trials 4 determination that the remaining properly admitted evidence was insufficient to make a submissible case under state ..... neely and cases in which the proof introduced becomes insufficient because the court of appeals determines that certain evidence should not have been admitted as in the instant case 8 insufficiency .....