Designs - Judgment Search Results

Armstrong Design and Acmitee India vs M/S Armstrong Design and Acmitee ...

Court: Karnataka

JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT APPEAL No. 430 OF 2024 (L-RES) BETWEEN:1. ARMSTRONG DESIGN AND ACMITEE INDIAMANUFACTURING WORKERS UNION, REGISTERED UNDER THE TRADE UNIONS ACT, 1926 TRADE UNIONS OFFICE No. 138, GROUND

The Designated Authority Vs. M/S the Andhra Petrochemicals Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 3046-3048_OF2020(Arising out of SLP (C) NO(S). 22582-22584 OF2019 THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S THE ANDHRA PETROCHEMICALS LIMITED ...RESPONDENT(S) S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.JUDGMENT1 Leave granted. With

Designated Authority, Ministry of Commerce and Industry and anr. Vs. I ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2009(234)ELT386(SC); 2009(1)SCALE68; (2009)2SCC510

(hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules').2. The writ petition was allowed primarily relying on Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Designated Authority and Ors. : 2006(202)ELT23(SC) and the interpretation placed on Section 9A(5) of the Act in the matter

Designated Authority Vs. Indian Refractory Makers' Assocn.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2003(88)ECC1; 2003(154)ELT349(SC); (2003)11SCC28

anti-dumping duty can serve no purpose. Without going into the merits of this controversy, we direct that the Designated Authority may consider the factual position and assess whether the closure of the factory of Birla Periclase factory

intel Design Systems (India) P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and C ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(125)ECC200; 2008(151)LC200(SC); 2008(223)ELT135(SC); JT2008(2)SC259; 2008(2)SCALE384; (2008)3SCC258; 2008(1)LC371(SC); 2008AIRSCW1285; 2008(3)KCCRSN173

are used in the tanks and armoured fighting vehicles. These goods are strictly manufactured as per drawing and design supplied by the customer i.e. Ministry of Defence. Since the goods are manufactured for use solely and principally

Designated Authority, Ministry of Commerce Vs. Lubrizon (India) Pvt. L ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(231)ELT206(SC)

Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995. A Preliminary Finding was given on 29th July, 2002 pursuant to which the Designated Authority issued Preliminary Notification on 5th September, 2002. The Final Finding was given by the Designated Authority on

Designated Authority Anti-dumping Directorate Ministry of Commerce Vs. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2000SC2556; 2000(70)ECC657; 2000(120)ELT11(SC); JT2000(8)SC120; 2000(5)SCALE239; (2000)6SCC626

in Civil Appeal No. _____of 2000 (arising out of S.L.P.(C) No. 5361/2000) had filed a petition before the Designated Authority (Anti-Dumping) Ministry of Commerce (for shor the 'Authority') alleging that M/s. Haldor Topsoe A/S (to be referred

Deepali Designs & Exhibits Private Ltd vs.pico Deepali Overlays Consor ...

Court: Delhi

OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h July, 2017 Decided on:18. h July, 2017 CS(COMM) 1590/2016 DEEPALI DESIGNS & EXHIBITS PRIVATE LTD ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. Raghvendra S. Kishore and Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocates. versus

Aqua Designs India Private Limited vs.union of India, Ministry of Powe ...

Court: Delhi

COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:24. 07.2017 + W.P.(C) 6699/2016 and CM No.27651/2016 AQUA DESIGNS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Versus ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF POWER AND ANR. Advocates who

Fashion Design Council of India vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Anr.

Court: Delhi

to the public. The sponsors, by enabling the event, provide a platform for the future growth of such designs and products of designers and eventual growth of the industry. By participating in the events in the way