Description - Year 2012 - Judgments

Jul 10 2012 (HC)

Rajubhai Dhamirbhai Baria and Others Vs. State of Gujarat and Others

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-10-2012

..... of days she submitted that therefore merely because the names of the accused and their description and description of the weapons is not mentioned in the police statements their testimony in the ..... should have recorded the names of the assailants or the appellants accused their description and also the description of the weapons used by them following omissions and contradictions have been brought .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 03 2012 (TRI)

M/S. N.V. Diamcad and Another Vs. the Assistant Controller of Patents ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Aug-03-2012

..... monopoly claimed was unclear or that there were inconsistencies between the claims and the description such inconsistency is not relevant in considering an objection on the ground of insufficiency ..... opponent misdirected the respondent 1 to believe that inconsistencies between the claims and the description amount to insufficiency this dichotomy has been clearly explained by justice whitford in dual .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 17 2012 (FN)

Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. Vs. Novo Nordisk a/S

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-17-2012

..... the information filed because that bill would have allowed a generic applicant to challenge overbroad descriptions of a patent novo contends that this court cannot read the statute that was ..... of the counterclaim provision congress considered a bill that required brand manufacturers to submit a description of the approved use covered by the patent claim and that allowed a generic manufacturer .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 10 2012 (HC)

Consim Info Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd., and Others

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-10-2012

..... the word ldquo fleck rdquo in what is clearly a descriptive sense as descriptive of a certain type of wool but it does ..... facie presumption that the name is suggestive rather than merely descriptive rdquo f in these circumstances the learned counsel appearing for ..... one person from those of another person or which is purely descriptive shall not be registered the marks that appellant has registered .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 05 2012 (HC)

Kashiram Vs. Mitthulal and anr.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-05-2012

..... the averments that he defendant is having open land the description whereof has been mentioned in the schedule attached to the ..... of sale have been incorrectly described and as per the description of the four boundaries mentioned in the document there exists ..... document of agreement of sale by deliberately mentioning the mis description of the property and although the defendant stated that today .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 2012 (TRI)

Bharat Forge Ltd. and Others Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Export) Nhav ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-03-2012

..... two digit level therefore eligibility to drawback has to be determined with reference to the description of goods given in the drawback schedule irrespective of the classification under the customs central ..... excise tariff if description given in the drawback schedule is taken as the basis the products exported by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 04 2012 (HC)

Ricoh India Limited Vs. Commissioner

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-04-2012

..... all mobile accessories costing upto rupees ten thousand 41a information technology products as per the description in column 2 below as covered under the headings or sub headings mentioned in column ..... 8443 and 8471 and the relevant changes are as under 8220 tariff item hsn code description of goods8443printing machinery used for printing by means of plates cylinders and other printing components .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2012 (TRI)

M/S. Hindustan Unilever Limited and Another Vs. M/S. Girnar Exports, T ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Jan-02-2012

..... in this case we have not accepted that it is descriptive though non descriptive vii rpc 1967 306 heavenly trade mark the ..... been erroneously withheld on the ground the said words are directly descriptive of the quality of the goods 18 the appellants had ..... of secondary meaning in certain cases which outweighs the apparently non descriptive character of the mark when viewed in isolation according to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 2012 (TRI)

M/S. Times Publishing House Ltd and Another Vs. M/S. the Financial Tim ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Apr-04-2012

..... was subsequently withdrawn by tphl 10 tphl seeks rectification on several grounds the mark is descriptive and unless there is evidence of distinctiveness the said mark cannot remain in the register ..... course of business at present or in future is prejudiced in that that is why descriptive words are not granted registration 3 durga dutt sharma v navaratna pharmaceuticals laboratories air 1965 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2012 (TRI)

Citibank, N.A./Citigroup Inc. Vs. Wealth Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Mar-09-2012

..... regard to the services that they are providing is purely descriptive he also submitted that with regard to the impugned mark ..... trademarks and unfair competition which gives a list of non descriptive words and merely suggestive to include words like acoustic research ..... feature which strikes the eye 10 we will summarise our description regarding distinctiveness in this case on the date of application .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Description - Judgment Search Results