Description - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: description Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.023 seconds)Consim Info Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2010
..... are concerned they are generally classified in the order of their increasing distinctiveness generic descriptive suggestive arbitrary and fanciful the more distinctive the mark the greater the protection afforded ..... is that the registered trademarks of the plaintiff contain a combination of generic and descriptive words and hence there is no protection mccarthy s desk encyclopedia of intellectual .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCol. (Now Lt. Colonel) M. NasiruddIn and Another Versus Union of India ...
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2010
..... expressed or recorded any dissenting note about the specifications of the animals recorded in the descriptive rolls the first petitioner on the basis of the instructions of maj gen rkr ..... the union of india they were even denied the opportunity to inspect the authenticated original descriptive rolls to know the discrepancies pointed out without any cogent evidence the petitioners were held .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTStokely Van Camp, Inc. and anr. Vs. Heinz India Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2010
..... the pfa and rules framed thereunder 9 7 the other contention of the plaintiff that descriptive words and expressions are registerable or that the expression rehydrate replenish refuel has acquired secondary ..... the trade mark gatorade and that the expression rehydrate replenish refuel is used in a descriptive sense this submission finds support in a document placed on record by the plaintiffs which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Pradeep Khanna, M/S. Sound Tarrific and Another Vs. Cc (iandg), N ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2010
..... flat panel display for automatic data processing machines plasma monitors for computers and this description has been confirmed by the customs authorities on physical examination the commissioner appeals has ..... indicating that the customs examination report is false the allegation of mis declaration of description against shri marwah would also fail the commissioner appeals however in this regard .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S the Himalaya Drug Company Vs. M/S Gufic Limited
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Jul-30-2010
..... laboratories navarathna for ayurvedic preparations was held not to be descriptive but distinctive viii 2002 24 ptc 355 del info edge ..... 38 the other issue was that regarding the mark being descriptive and not distinctive and was not in accordance with the ..... has though repeatedly argued that the trade mark sallaki is descriptive and cannot be registered has filed an application for registration .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEversmile Pre-fab Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise Thane-i ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-18-2010
..... declaration the assessee filed this declaration effective from 1 5 1995 furnishing the general description of the goods and indicating the notification under which exemption was claimed by them ..... which were cleared from the factory in the aforesaid manner would fit in the description blocks slabs lintels concrete beams and stairs constituting intermediates and components of prefabricated buildings .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEnercon (India) Limited Vs. Aloys Wobben
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Dec-02-2010
..... specification has to be considered which is insufficient 62 secondly the impugned specification gives a description that is contrary to the claim 2 attention was invited to page 32 last paragraph ..... entire dependant claims and apparatus claim 12 are not sufficiently and fairly supported by the description in the specification 66 arguments by the respondent on insufficiency it was pointed out by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCadila Healthcare Ltd. Vs Diat Foods (India)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-29-2010
..... the respondent could not be restrained from absolutely using expression sugar free particularly in the descriptive sense simultaneously it was made clear that if any party enters into the domain of ..... that there could not be any restraint on the expression sugar free particularly in the descriptive sense but simultaneously came to the conclusion that the grievance of the appellant had been .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMcdonald Vs. Chicago
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-28-2010
..... era before post at 12 justice stevens also relies on the requirement of a careful description of the asserted fundamental liberty interest to limit judicial discretion post at 25 internal ..... democratic process post at 7 11 17 dissenting opinion footnote 4 after defending the careful description criterion justice stevens quickly retreats and cautions courts not to apply it too stringently post .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNavshakti Industries P. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2010
Reported in: 2010(174)LC95(Delhi)
..... agents had mentioned in the correspondence made with the overseas supplier that by giving the description the description as newsprint paper their party i e the importer could get the consignment cleared ..... no 48 of customs tariff were evading customs duty by way of misdeclaration of the description of the imported goods and undervaluing the same in connivance with various holders of certificates .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial