Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delimitation amendment act 2003 section 4 amendment of section 8 Court: chennai Page 10 of about 12,364 results (0.187 seconds)

Apr 19 2012 (HC)

S. Balasubramaninan Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... such appeal shall lie to the court to which an appeal ordinarily lies against the order of conviction of such court.] *inserted by the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 2005 (5 of 2009) s.29 (w.e.f. 31-12-2009)"therefore, the victim is also given a right to prefer an appeal against acquittal or ..... above circumstances, this revision is transferred to the file of the ii additional district judge, chennai, who shall hear the same along with c.a.no.289 of 2003 and dispose of both the cases in accordance with law. 11. therefore, the revision for enhancement filed by the complainants/employees was transferred to the learned additional ..... a criminal revision before this court for enhancement of sentence. 10. admittedly, when the said criminal revision was taken up in crl.r.c.no.1442 of 2003, the learned counsel for the respondents/employers submitted that against the conviction, the respondents/employers have already preferred an appeal which was pending before the learned ii additional .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 08 2012 (HC)

Ms.J.R.Metal Chennai Ltd. Vs. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution C ...

Court : Chennai

..... to the destination of his own use:provided also that the state commission shall, not later than five years from the date of commencement of the electricity (amendment) act, 2003, by regulations, provide such open access to all consumers who require a supply of electricity where the maximum power to be made available at any time ..... of power under sub-section (1) of section 55 and clause (e) of section 73 read with sub-section (2) of section 177 of electricity act, 2003 and stated that the specification of meters including abt meter is as per the standards prescribed by the central electricity authority. he therefore, justified the memo stating ..... , like, windmill generators/cpp through the open access facility provided by the respondents. the open access system as defined under section 2(47) of the electricity act, 2003 reads as follows:- (47) open access means the non- discriminatory provision for the use of transmission lines or distribution system or associated facilities with such lines .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2012 (HC)

Chemplast Sanmar Limited. Vs. the Chairman and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... 's premises under regulation 2(l) of the tamil nadu electricity distribution code, 2004 and the word "premises" in section 2(51) of the electricity act, 2003 include land, building or structure . in the present cases the building or structure admittedly belongs to the petitioners industries concerned. it is to the petitioners industries ..... nadu electricity distribution code, 2004 reads as follows:- "(l) "consumer's premises" means the area served by a service connection;"section 2(51) of the electricity act, 2003 reads as follows:- "(51)"premises" includes any land, building or structure;" 36.therefore, on a reading of the above provisions, it is clear that the term ..... amended regulation. 39.having considered the rival submission, the point in issue is the interpretation of the term owner of premises . the term consumer's premises as defined in regulation 2(l) of the tamil nadu electricity distribution code, 2004 and the word premises as defined under section 2(51) of the electricity act, 2003 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 12 2012 (HC)

K.M.Balasubramaniam. Vs. Savithiri

Court : Chennai

..... ritual to be performed for the marriage as per the personal law or form of marriage applicable to them - s.7-a of the hindu marriage act, 1955 [as inserted by the hindu marriage (tamil nadu amendment) act, 1967] validates the marriage performed between the parties concerned by garlanding each other or putting a ring upon any finger of the other or tying ..... 391 of cr.p.c. there is no lacuna in the trial court's judgment. the revision petitioner cross-examined the p.w.1 in c.c.no.29 of 2003 on 03.09.2007. at that time, the revision petitioner had not raised any question regarding the conversation.8. the learned counsel for the respondent had cited the following ..... talked over phone about the alleged marriage on 30.12.2002, whereas she has stated in her complaint that she came to know about the marriage only on 11.01.2003 through her sister's husband. as such, contradiction arises in the evidence of p.w.1. hence, a clarification is necessary to ascertain the true facts after cross-examination .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2012 (HC)

S.Sivakumar. Vs. P.Venkatachalam

Court : Chennai

..... after the exercise of due diligence, the evidence was not within his knowledge and could not be produced by him when he was leading the evidence. by act 46 of 1999, the amended provision under section 17-a was omitted and it was given effect from 1-7-2002. order 18 rule 17 is primarily a provision enabling the court to ..... power under section 151 of the code is not intended to be used routinely, merely for the asking. if so used, it will defeat the very purpose of various amendments to the code to expedite trials. but where the application is found to be bona fide and where the additional evidence, oral or documentary, will assist the court to ..... to meet the ends of justice, by enabling the authorities to substantiate their claim. hence, both the provisions cannot be interpreted rigidly." (ii) a supreme court decision reported in 2003 (3) ctc 315 in the case of baljeet singh vs. harliveleen "5. having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 02 2008 (HC)

Salem Textiles Limited 'B' unit rep. by Its General Manager (Tech), Mr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)1MLJ844

..... . v. union of india and anr. : [2005]274itr194(sc) has dealt with the validity of an amendment act. while dealing with the said amendment act, it was held that the object of the finance act, 2003, which has in effect amended section 65(5), 66(3) and 68 of finance act, 1994 was to nullify the earlier decision in laghu udyog bharati v. union of india : 1999ecr53(sc ..... of 2007, viz., tamil nadu tax on consumption or sale of electricity (amendment) act, 2007, by which amendments have been incorporated into act 12 of 2003, viz., tamil nadu tax on consumption or sale of electricity act,2003, the learned senior counsel submitted that even after the amendment act has been introduced as a validating law, the same is valid only if such law cures the defects pointed out .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2006 (HC)

Gowri Ammal Vs. Murugan,

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2006)2MLJ729

..... of the court to enlarge time that may have been fixed or granted by the court for the doing of any act prescribed or allowed by the code. the amendment provides that the period shall not exceed 30 days in total. before amendment, there was no such restriction of time. whether the court has no inherent power to extend the time beyond 30 ..... the learned single judge, that the decisions rendered by the other learned single judges in (i) d. raju v. n. ramalingam 2001 (3) l.w.254 ; (ii) angammal v. ramasamy 2003 (3) m.l.j.770 and (iii) k. rangasamy gounder v. muthusamy gounder 2005 (3) m.l.j.331, require re-consideration.22. accordingly, we hold that the decisions rendered ..... , three other decisions, namely, (i) d. raju v. n. ramalingam 2001 (3) l.w.254, rendered by justice n.v. balasubramanian, as he then was; (ii) angammal v. ramasamy 2003 (3) m.l.j.770 and (iii) k. rangasamy gounder v. muthusamy gounder 2005 (3) m.l.j.331, rendered by justice r. banumathi, were cited, wherein it was held .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2007 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Pioneer Asia Packing (P) Limited

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(Mad)202; [2009]310ITR198(Mad)

..... s explanation that prior to 1996 unabsorbed depreciation could be set off against any other head of income and could be carried forward individually. but as per the amendment under finance act, 1996 w.e.f. 01.04.1997 the cumulated unabsorbed depreciation brought forward as on 01.04.1997 could be set off against the taxable business profit ..... that the business to which depreciation allowance is related to must be carried on in the succeeding year so as to allow such set off. thus, by the amendment, the deeming fiction of treating the earlier years' unabsorbed depreciation as current year depreciation was removed. the period available for absorbing the unabsorbed depreciation against the profit of ..... the appeal is filed against the order of the income tax appellate tribunal madras 'b' bench dated 7.3.2007 made in i.t.a. no. 896/mds/2003 for the assessment year 2000-01.2. the brief facts of the case as culled out from the statement of facts stated in the memorandum of appeal are as follows .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2011 (HC)

Addison Paints and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Labour and ...

Court : Chennai

..... third respondent's refusal to accept the transfer order, should be treated as non-service. fortunately, under section 2a of the act, the term continuous service has been defined. this amendment was brought into force by act 26 of 1984. the said definition includes both continuous service as well as discontinuous service. it is only in cases where ..... respondent rejected the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order passed by the second respondent controlling authority made in p.g.case no.29 of 2003 dated 14.08.2003.2. the writ petition was admitted on 26.07.2004. pending the writ petition, this court granted an interim stay. the third respondent employee filed ..... for the period of eight years, the third respondent sent an application for gratuity under the payment of gratuity act to the second respondent. the said application was taken as p.g.case no.29 of 2003 and notice was issued to the petitioner management. they filed counter statement and an additional counter statement.10. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2012 (HC)

Ms.A.R.S. Metals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Bo ...

Court : Chennai

..... 's premises under regulation 2(l) of the tamil nadu electricity distribution code, 2004 and the word "premises" in section 2(51) of the electricity act, 2003 include land, building or structure . in the present cases the building or structure admittedly belongs to the petitioners industries concerned. it is to the petitioners industries ..... nadu electricity distribution code, 2004 reads as follows:-"(l) "consumer's premises" means the area served by a service connection;"section 2(51) of the electricity act, 2003 reads as follows:-"(51)"premises" includes any land, building or structure;"36.therefore, on a reading of the above provisions, it is clear that the term ..... amended regulation.39.having considered the rival submission, the point in issue is the interpretation of the term owner of premises . the term consumer's premises as defined in regulation 2(l) of the tamil nadu electricity distribution code, 2004 and the word premises as defined under section 2(51) of the electricity act, 2003 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //