Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi rent control act 1958 repealed section 56 power to make rules Court: madhya pradesh Page 6 of about 137 results (0.706 seconds)

Firm Chironjilal Ramjibhai and Co. Vs. Chunarmal Motiram and Co. and o ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1976CriLJ437

..... all of them. i shall, however, refer to the decision of their lordships of the supreme court in abdul karim haji tayab v. deputy custodian-general, new delhi : [1964]6scr837 the relevant observations whereof are reproduced below:it is well settled that procedural amendments to a law apply, in the absence of any- thing to ..... in those pending proceedings. in view of this clear provision contained in this section, it can unerringly be said that even section 6 of the general clauses act, 1897 does not support the contention of the learned counsel for the applicant.13. thus, the present revision being against an interlocutory order is not maintainable ..... any such investigation, legal proceedings or remedy may be instituted, continued or enforced, and any such penalty, forfeiture or punishment may be imposed as if the repealing act or regulation had not been passed.'the key expression to attract the applicability of this section is 'unless a different intention appears, the repeal shall not.' it .....

Chhotelal Keshavram (by Manager) Vs. Industrial Court (by M.A. Razzaqu ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1966)IILLJ733MP

..... said order to the party concerned, and, therefore, the expression ' the date of the award ' used in proviso (b) to section 18(2) of the land acquisition act, 1894, meant the date when the award was either communicated to the party or was known by him either actually or constructively. the meaning of ' actual' or 'constructive' ..... copying time, then revision petitions posted at rajnandgaon on 30 march 1964 were within time. learned counsel also alternatively argued that even if section 66 (2) of the act of 1960 governed the revision petitions filed in the industrial court, still the petitions had been filed within time as the expression ' unless it is made within thirty ..... requisite for obtaining copies of the orders, expired on 22 march 1964. he further rejected the petitioner's prayer for condonation, under section 5 of the limitation act, of delay in the filing of the revision petitions on the ground that the petitioner had not explained the delay in the filing of the petitions from 22 .....

R.B. Shukla Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1993)IIILLJ648MP; 1991(0)MPLJ284

..... compensation exceeds threehundred rupees or such direction has theeffect of imposing on the employer or theother person a financial liability exceedingone thousand rupees'.7. in the same act, the terms 'employed person', 'employer' and 'industrial or other establishment' are defined in section 2; clause (h) includes establishment of central and state ..... municipality v. shiv shankar 1971 i scc 442. suffice to say this much only to reject the contention based on the doctrine of implied repeal that section 28(b) itself effectively rebuffs that; moreover, p.w. act has a limited and different field of operation ..... act. it can have no application when two enactments have different scopes and operate in different fields. as maxwell states, courts disfavour implied repeal: 'if earlier and later statutes can reasonably be construed in such a way that both can be given effect to, this must be done', (12th edition, page 191). see also, in this connection, delhi .....

Bhaskar Bhai S/O. Apa Bhai Patel Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1993)IIILLJ897MP; 1991(0)MPLJ513

..... contained in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (no. 2 of 1974) or any other law for the time being in force, every offence punishable under this act and the acts specified in schedule ii-a shall be tried by the labour court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction it was committed. reference was also made to the provisions ..... but under the first schedule of the code, the offence is triable by judicial magistrate first class.18. to me, it appears that while enhancing by the amending act of 1987 the punishment in respect of certain offences, the question of limited competence of the labour court with the powers of the magistrate of the first class as ..... have been made punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years or even ten years. according to the learned counsel section 64 of the relations act provides that the labour court shall have powers under the code of the judicial magistrate first class who according to section 29(2) of the code can pass sentence .....

Ajay Kumar Vs. Divisional Forest Officer-cum-licensing Officer and ors ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2005MP195

..... officer is satisfied, either on a reference made to it in this behalf or otherwise, that -(a) the licensee has parted, in whole or in part with his control over the saw mill or saw pit or has otherwise ceased to operate or own such saw mill or saw pit; or(b) the licensee 1ms, without reasonable cause, ..... account for satisfactorily and consequently which is liable for confiscation under section 9;then without prejudice to any other penalty to which the licensee may be liable under this act, the licensing officer may, after giving the licensee an opportunity of showing cause revoke of suspend the licence and forfeit the sum if any, or any portion thereof ..... respondent no. 1 herein whereby licence granted to the petitioner under the provisions of m.p. kasta chiran (viniyam) adhiniyam, 1984 (here in after shall be referred as 'act') has been cancelled and the order dated 26-6-2004 vide annexure-p/10 passed by respondent no. 2 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed, the present .....

Rajendra Kumar Pate Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(0)MPLJ580

..... area commander, allahabad and anr., (1991) lab. i.c. 1056 (all.) and t. v. thampan v. adjunct general discipline and vigilance directorate branch army head quarters, new delhi, (1994) lab. i.c. 599 (ker.)4. smt. indira nair, learned counsel for the respondents contended that the petitioner was arrested and challan was put up on 3-6 ..... the army. it is for this reason that commission, appointment and enrolment is made with the strict compliance of the provisions contained in chapter iii of the act of which section 13 prescribes the procedure before the enrolling officer which lays down that upon the appearance before the prescribed enrolling officer of any person desirous of ..... , he shall sign and shall also cause such person to sign the enrolment paper and such person shall thereupon be deemed to be enrolled. section 15 of the act speaks of validity of enrolment. section 16 enumerates the persons to be attested, namely, -(a) all persons enrolled as combatants,(b) all persons selected to hold .....

Tariq Riyaz Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1998CriLJ4437

..... -(i) was against any law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the union extends, or(ii) was investigated by the delhi special police establishment under the delhi special police establishment act 1946 (25 of 1946), or(iii) involved in the misappropriation or destruction of, or damage to, any property belonging to the central government ..... , or(iv) was committed by a person in the service of the central government while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official ..... to further and maintain.10. in this context i may usefully refer to the decision rendered in the case of r. m. tewari v. state (nct of delhi) with govt. of nct, delhi v. judge, designated court ii (tad a) and mohd. mehfooz v. chief (1996) 2 scc 610 : (1996 cri lj 2872) wherein the apex court .....

Neo Sacks Limited Vs. Cegat

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(61)ECC238; 1999(114)ELT826(MP)

..... and arises from two writ petitions wherein petitioners are resisting payment of excise duty and are aggrieved of the orders passed by the customs, excise and gold (control) appellate tribunal (for short cegat). the petitions are opposed by respondents on the priliminary objection that this court had no jurisdiction to test the validity of the ..... because its notification no. 5/95, dated 31-5-1995 placed the state of madhya pradesh within the territorial jurisdiction of its northern bench with headquarter at delhi which could hold sittings either at headquarter or at such other place within the respective jurisdiction including madhya pradesh. thus, once a bench of the cegat was ..... a writ petition against any order/decision of the tribunal even though passed at its new delhi headquarter. it is further held that alternative statutory remedy of appeal to supreme court provided in section 35l of the central excise act against the order of the cegat would not operate as a bar to the maintainability .....

Central Bank of India, Tirodi Branch Vs. Abdul Mujeeb Khan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(0)MPLJ1110

..... bank cannot be made responsible has no substance, though there is a non obstante clause which speaks that notwithstanding anything to the contrary in section 152 of the indian contract act, the bank shall not be responsible for any loss or deterioration of or damage to the said vehicle taken possession of by the bank whether by theft, fire, flood ..... premises, if any or to remove the said vehicle to any other premises. it further says that notwithstanding anything to the contrary to section 152 of the indian contract act, the bank shall not be responsible for any loss or deterioration of, or damage to the said vehicle taken possession of by the bank whether by theft, fire, flood ..... issued to sell the truck and to adjust the sale proceeds in the decretal amount. reliance was placed on a decision of delhi high court in case of bank of mah. v. racmann auto (p) ltd., air 1991 delhi 278 and of punjab and haryana high court in case of prestolite of india limited, faridabad v. union bank of india .....

Rajesh Henry. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh, and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... /12, state government has decided to exercise the powers of suo motu revision conferred on it under section 29(1)(iii) of the m.p. civil services (classification, control and appeal) rules, 1966 [hereinafter referred to as 'disciplinary rules'] and by an order-dated 31.12.2008 ordered an enquiry under rule 14, challenging this action, ..... in or in connection with the factory. it was argued that by virtue of this non obstante clause in section 70 of the bombay shops and establishment act, the factories act, which was not applicable to the claimants would become applicable. the matter was considered by the supreme court and it was held in the aforesaid case ..... 6.5.1999, the commissioner cannot entertain the appeal. respondent no.4 challenged this action by filing an appeal under section 19 of the administrative tribunal's act before mp state administrative tribunal in o.a.no.1750/2000 and simultaneously filed an application for review of the entire matter before the state government within six .....