Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi rent control act 1958 repealed section 56 power to make rules Court: madhya pradesh jabalpur

Oct 21 2010 (HC)

Aseem Kumar. Vs. Madhusudan Agarwal and Others.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... /2004, decreeing the suit of the respondents against him for eviction under the provisions of transfer of property act, his appeal has been dismissed.2. it is undisputed legal position that the provisions of m.p. accommodation control act, 1961 are not made applicable to town timarni, district harda where the disputed premises is situated.3. the ..... his alleged family partition, is also denied. the execution of the alleged deed of family arrangement is also disputed. in such premises, the averments regarding arrears of rent and termination of tenancy by the alleged notice, are also denied. however, service of the aforesaid notice on him, is admitted. in special pleadings it is ..... title of the respondent with respect of the disputed house. with these averments, the impugned suit for eviction as well as for recovery of the arrears of rent and mesne profit was filed.3. in the written statement of the appellant, the averments of the plaint relating to the relationship of landlord and tenant are .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 2010 (HC)

Rajesh Henry. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh, and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... /12, state government has decided to exercise the powers of suo motu revision conferred on it under section 29(1)(iii) of the m.p. civil services (classification, control and appeal) rules, 1966 [hereinafter referred to as 'disciplinary rules'] and by an order-dated 31.12.2008 ordered an enquiry under rule 14, challenging this action, ..... in or in connection with the factory. it was argued that by virtue of this non obstante clause in section 70 of the bombay shops and establishment act, the factories act, which was not applicable to the claimants would become applicable. the matter was considered by the supreme court and it was held in the aforesaid case ..... 6.5.1999, the commissioner cannot entertain the appeal. respondent no.4 challenged this action by filing an appeal under section 19 of the administrative tribunal's act before mp state administrative tribunal in o.a.no.1750/2000 and simultaneously filed an application for review of the entire matter before the state government within six .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //