Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi rent control act 1958 repealed section 56 power to make rules Court: madhya pradesh Page 3 of about 137 results (0.177 seconds)

Jun 28 1999 (HC)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Balwant Singh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2001ACJ246

..... regarding its operation from 1990. thereafter, on the suggestions of the review committee and those of transport council object of deletion of section 166(3) of the act by the act no. 54 of 1994 was given as follows:(i) removal of time-limit for filing of application by road accidents victims for compensation. it appears that ..... by the counsel for the applicant. it appears that the motor accidents claims tribunal can itself take cognizance of an accident. under section 158(6) of amendment act there is duty on the officer incharge of the police station to give information received at the police station or to submit completed report of investigation within 30 ..... acj 1013 (sc). it was further argued that there was no merit in the contention of the learned counsel for the applicant that article 137 of the limitation act would govern the proceedings before claims tribunal. the article would not apply to the proceedings before the tribunal and, therefore, there was no merit in the contention that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 1989 (HC)

Bhursingh Poonamchand Malwai and ors. Vs. Shyamsunder

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1990MP30; 1989MPLJ336

..... of u. p. v. baburam upadhyaya, air 1961 sc 751; state of m. p. v. m/s. azar bharat financial company, air 1967 sc 276; commissioner of income-tax, delhi v. s. teja singh, air 1959 sc 352; jagirsingh v. ranbirsingh, air 1979 sc 381; u. p. bhudan yagya samiti v. brijkishore, (1988) 4 scc 274: (air ..... 1970 jab lj 912 : (air 1970 sc 2007), while construing the provisions of the m.p. act of 1934 in para 5, observed that the act was enacted with the object of making better provision for the regulation and control of the transactions of money-lending so as to secure protection to ignorant debtors against evil of fraud and ..... aforesaid; and any such investigation, legal proceeding, or remedy may be instituted, continued or enforced, and any such penalty, forfeiture or punishment may be imposed as if this act had not been passed :provided further that, subject to the preceding proviso, anything done or any action taken (including any appointment or delegation made, notification, order, instruction or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 2008 (HC)

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Through Chief S ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2008MP142; 2008(2)MPHT490

..... right to livelihood guaranteed under article 21 of the constitution but the supreme court relying on its earlier decision basheshwar nath v. commissioner of income-tax, delhi : [1959]35itr190(sc) rejected the preliminary objection and held that there can be no estoppel against the constitution and that the principle of estoppel can ..... ha. of omkareshwar project in khandwa, khargone and dewas districts of madhya pradesh by letter dated 31st august, 2004 under section 2 of the forest conservation act, 1980 subject to the conditions stipulated therein and condition no. 5 stipulated that displaced shall be resettled on non-forest lands as per the resettlement and ..... a complaint to the government of india under section 3 of the inter-state water disputes act, 1956 stating that a water dispute has arisen between the states of gujarat, madhya pradesh and maharashra over the use, distribution and control of water of narmada, an inter-state river. the central government constituted the 'narmada water .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 1962 (HC)

Nathulal Chhotelal Shellac, Factory Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Sal ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1962MP287; 1962MPLJ653; [1962]13STC853(MP)

..... integrated remedy leading ultimately to the last stage, namely, a reference to the high court. so, in a like case arising under the madhya bharat sales tax act (30 of 1950), which contained similar provisions, the question was whether the right given to a dealer of moving the commissioner to exercise his revisional power in respect ..... demand a reference to the high court without first moving the board in revision. it is not without significance that, under section 22 (5) of the repealed act, the board was not merely empowered to revise am order passed in second appeal on an application made to it for the; purpose. before rejecting the application the ..... sales tax, jabalpur, whereby he declined to entertain second appeals against orders of assess-taewt of sales tax on the ground that, under the madhya pradesh general sales tax act, 1959 (2 of 1959), the board of revenue, madhya pradesh, had jurisdiction to entertain, such appeals.2. for brevity, the details of the various assessment orders, .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1967 (HC)

Gokuldas Pagaria Vs. Parmanand Chaurasia

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1967MP265

..... for recovery of possession shallbe instituted by a landlord against a tenanton the ground of non-payment of the standard rent ' occurring insection 12(2) of the bombay rents. hotel andlodging house rates control act, 1947 wasconstrued as relating to suits instituted afterthe coming into force of the bombay actand as not applying to ..... notification dated the 13th june 1964 issued by the central government under section 3 of the cantonments (extension of rent control laws) act, 1957, does not contain any provision making the m.p. accommodation control act. 1961, applicable to suits pending on the date of the notification. the question whether on i he extension ..... excluded from its operation the cantonment areas in the state. neither of these acts was proprio vigore applicable to cantonment areas. in 1957 the cantonments (extension of rent control laws) act, 1957, was enacted by parliament. section 3 of this act gives to the central government the power to extend, by a notification, to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 1989 (HC)

Rajkumar and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1990MPLJ289

..... emphasise that remands in the absence of an accused should be granted only under such circumstances where the production of the accused in person before the magistrate is beyond the control of the state or prosecuting agency. from the plain language of section 167(2)(b) read with the explanation appended at the end of sub-clause (c) of ..... habeas corpus can be issued. if any authority is needed to support the aforesaid view, a reference may be made to the decisions in ram narayan singh v. state of delhi, air 1953 sc 277, para 4, and talik hussain v. state of j. and k., air 1971 sc 62. in the instant case before us, this petition was ..... . swarnkar, learned counsel for the petitioners, placing his reliance on the provisions contained in clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 167 of the code of criminal procedure (act no. 2 of 1974), 1974 (for brevity, referred to as the 'code'), vehemently urged before us that if the police or judicial remand is granted by any magistrate authorised to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2011 (HC)

Niranjankumar Awasthi Vs. Ajay Vijaywargiya and Another

Court : Madhya Pradesh Indore

..... no.54-a/2007, directing thereby eviction on the ground under section 12 (1) (a) and (e) of the m.p. accommodation control act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the act). 2. relevant facts in short are that plaintiff/respondents purchased the suit accommodation from one kamal kishore shrivastava son of chandravilas shrivastava, vide registered ..... tenant of plaintiffs on account of purchase of suit accommodation vide registered sale dated 31.08.2006. plaintiffs vide notice dated 23.04.2007 demanded the rent, which was not paid despite service of demand notice. plaintiffs required the suit premises for their own residence because they have no other vacant accommodation of ..... regards statement of bhavesh patel, (pw-3), it may be seen that he has merely stated that the suit accommodation was given to the defendant on rent through om prakash vijaywargiya. he has nowhere stated that om prakash was disclosed as owner/landlord of the suit accommodation. admittedly, om prakash vijaywargiya has not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 1991 (HC)

Hariram Lehrumal Sindhi Vs. Anandrao Narayanrao Mukati and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1992MP1; 1992(0)MPLJ373

..... can the mortgagor be called to be a landlord within the meaning of the special definitions of 'tenant' and 'landlord' respectively as provided under the m.p. accommodation control act, 1961.17. it may be mentioned here that a long argument was advanced in this matter also contending inter alia that there is a hypothetical landlord contemplated under second ..... to be conterminous with the mortgage, was created by the mortgages, the lease does not have protection either under s.76(a) of the transfer of property act or under the rent act. that precisely is the position in the undisputed facts of our case. in our case the lease in favour of the appellant was created by the mortgagee ..... appeal against decree of redempttion, but chose to restrict his first appeal only to the eviction part of the decree valuing it on the basis of twelve months rent. that is not all. it was pointed out for the respondent anandrao that even in the memo of appeal the present appellant hariram based his contention on an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 1987 (HC)

Spedra Engineering Corporation Engineers and Contractors, Bhopal Vs. S ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1988MP111

..... to be tried by special courts. the supreme court in kewal singh v. lajwanti, air 1980 sc161 held that the legislature has not violated article 14 by incorporating section 25b, delhi rent control act, 1958, providing for summary disposal of casesfiled by the landlord to evict tenants on the grounds of his bona fide need in order to get quick and expeditious relief. such ..... not be arbitrary, artificial or evasive. again in ravi dutt sharma v. ratan lal bhargava. air 1984 sc 967 the supreme court while interpreting section 25 a to c of delhi rent control act. 1958, held that it was open to the legislature, to pick out one class of landlords out of the several covered by section 14(1)(e) of the ..... rent act so long as they formed a class by themselves and the legislature was free to provide the benefit of a special procedure to them in the matter of eviction of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 1953 (HC)

iqbal Ahmed Vs. State of Bhopal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1954CriLJ602

..... pakistan, as it is not said that devinarayan had actually met him.23. it must appear that action has been taken against izhar ahmed under section 7, influx from pakistan (control) act (no. 23 of 1949) and therefore a question arises whether the essentials of that section were present in the case to support the action. the question involved, therefore, is ..... then. it also appears that he was married to one mst. wahida begum under the 'nikahnama', dated 20-11-1946 and was residing in a rented house of one mahmuda begum in respect of which rent-receipts are filed on record. sugar ration-cards were also obtained in his name from time to time and subscription for a mosque also was paid ..... ahmed's not going to pakistan. the documents viz., the cash-memo dated 24-1-1951, sugar ration-card no. 427/33, the rent-receipt dated 3-5-1951 and the letter dated 14-6-1951, the rent-receipt dated 27-8-51, another ration-card in favour of izhar ahmed dated 5-3-1952 and the certified copies of the electoral .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //