Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 7,937 results (0.137 seconds)

Jan 24 2006 (HC)

Mukesh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-24-2006

Reported in : 2006(2)MPHT344

..... leading to discovery of certain fact which was not in the knowledge of the police previously. in the matter of thimma v. state of mysore air 1971 sc 1871, the apex court has held that once a fact is discovered from other sources there can be no fresh discovery even if relevant information is extracted from the ..... new fact was discovered by the information given by applicant siddhu. therefore, it is held that the information (ex. p-3) recorded under section 27 of the evidence act is inadmissible in evidence. apart from this statement, there is no incriminating evidence available on record against applicant siddhu.13. likewise the information (ex. p-13) said ..... evidence being the information regarding the fact which was already known to the police and therefore this information was not admissible in evidence. section 27 of the evidence act reads as under:-provided that when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 2006 (HC)

Dr. Vinay Samuel Arawattigi S/O Late Dr. S.S. Arawattigi Vs. the Princ ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-07-2006

Reported in : AIR2007All13; 2006(4)AWC3786

..... jurisdiction, that is so provided by section 9 of the act. the fact of this case indicate, as i have already pointed out, that the minors had an ancestral home in meerut that they had been there during the better part of their short life , and that they had been at dehra dun only for a very brief span of a few hours ..... have already pointed out, alter that position. so that i must hold , as i do , that the minors were not ordinarily residing within the territorial jurisdiction of the court at dehra dun and that the learned judge's order holding that he had jurisdiction was erroneous.10. learned counsel for the opposite party, as a last resort, argued that i should refrain ..... from interfering with the order of the court below inasmuch as no injustice was likely to accrue if the case was tried at dehra dun instead of at meerut. it was further argued by learned counsel that in this case the applicants had removed the minors from the jurisdiction of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2006 (HC)

O.N.G.C. Ltd. Vs. O.L. of Ambica Mills Co. Ltd. and 11 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-16-2006

Reported in : [2006]132CompCas606(Guj); [2006]71SCL274(Guj)

..... with regard to matters enumerated in section 529. that was also the view taken by a full bench of the allahabad high court in hansraj v. official liquidators, dehra dun mussoorie electric tramway co. ltd. : air1929all353 . a similar view was taken by the oudh chief court in b. anand behari lal v. dinshaw and co. ..... up as a body corporate. it is now a statutory corporation constituted by and under the oil and natural gas commission act (central act 43 of 1959, hereinafter referred to as the act). the act provides for the establishment of a commission sfor the development of petroleum and petroleum products produced by it and for matters connected ..... in winding up of insolvent companies, section 529a which provides overriding preferential payments.3.12 the learned counsel has relied on the provisions of the provincial insolvency act, 1920, particularly section 2(e) which provides definition of secured creditors which deals with section 45 in part iii administration of property, method of proof .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2006 (HC)

Girvar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-19-2006

Reported in : RLW2007(2)Raj1519; 2006(4)WLC488

..... took place in the field belonging to accused party, therefore it cannot be presumed that the appellants had any intention to kill the deceased but it appears that they acted to protect their property. after appellant bhanu was assaulted by the complainant party with sharp and blunt weapons, he had right to defend himself and his property. one ..... section 96 makes it abundantly clear that nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defence. they did not commit any criminal act or to do anything which may be described as unlawful. their object was not to kill the deceased but to protect their property. it may be, that in given ..... right of private defence to thwart the same. in the course of exercise of such right of private defence, the accused who gunned down the mischief makers, has obviously acted far in excess of right of private defence. nonetheless the first degree of right of private defence cannot be denied to the accused.14. in subramani v. state t .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 30 2006 (TRI)

Arihant Tiles and Marbles (P) Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

Decided on : Jun-30-2006

Reported in : (2006)104TTJ(Jodh.)149

..... and distinct commodity but shall not include such processing as may be notified by the state government. the employees provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 and the factories act, 1948 manufacturing process means any process for making, altering, repairing, ornamenting, finishing, packing, oiling, washing, cleaning, breaking up, demolishing ..... latex by centrifuging process, amounts to manufacture, as it is commercially different from natural latex and capable of being put to different use (ref. it act, 1961 section 80j).manufacture is end result of one or more processes, through which original commodity passes. manufacture implies change but every change is ..... v. delhi cloth and general mills 22. the whole controversy in this case hinges around the definition of the words "manufacture" or "production". the it act, has not defined either the 'manufacture' or the 'production', and rightly so, because these cannot be defined either by giving inclusive and exclusive definition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 2006 (HC)

Prabhat Uppal Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-08-2006

Reported in : 2006(91)DRJ501

..... lying dead and accused lying unconscious does not claim to have noticed anything suggesting that the deceased had resisted strangulation. that circumstance also shows that she had consented to the act of her husband.17. on the applicability of exception 5 to section 300 ipc we may usefully refer to a judgment of madras high court reported as re. naina muthu ..... premeditation on the part of the accused to kill his wife but was a pact for suicide in which the deceased partook by swallowing a portion of tik-20. the act of strangulation appears to be done in the heat of passion.14. we must not lose sight of the fact that the evidence on record shows that the couple were .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2006 (HC)

B. Vandana Kumari Vs. P. Praveen Kumar and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-26-2006

Reported in : AIR2007AP17; 2006(6)ALD548; 2007(1)ALT193; I(2007)DMC246

..... child could have been begotten.27. once, he succeeded in establishing the same and the marriage is declared as void under section 12(1)(d) of hindu marriage act, 1955, it would automatically follow that the child though born during the continuance of a valid marriage shall be regarded as illegitimate. such evidence is permissible under the ..... a sublime public policy that children should not suffer social disability on account of the laches or lapses of parents.we may remember that section 112 of the evidence act was enacted at a time when the modern scientific advancements with dioxy nucleic acid (dna) as well as ribonucleic acid (rna) tests were not even in contemplation ..... would amount to permitting the husband to lead evidence to rebut the conclusive proof as to the legitimacy of the child enjoined under section 112 of the evidence act which is not permissible under law.10. on the other hand, the learned counsel for the 1st respondent/husband contended that having regard to the nature of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 2006 (FN)

S. D. Warren Co. Vs. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-15-2006

..... 713 (1994). footnote 2 no one disputes that the presumpscot river is a navigable water of the united states. footnote 3 the term pollutant is defined in the act to mean dredged spoil, solid waste, incinerator residue, sewage, garbage, sewage sludge, munitions, chemical wastes, biological materials, radioactive materials, heat, wrecked or discarded equipment ..... at 1071 . of course, congress omitted the reference to thermal discharge, and settled on the definition we have today. see federal water pollution control act amendments of 1972, 502(16), 86 stat. 887. warren reasons that once congress abandoned the special treatment for thermal pollutants, it merely struck the words ..... of the river. under protest, warren applied for water quality certifications from respondent maine board of environmental protection pursuant to 401 of the clean water act, which requires state approval of any activity which may result in any discharge into the [nation s] navigable waters. ferc licensed the dams subject .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2006 (HC)

Mohd. HussaIn Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Dec-22-2006

Reported in : 2007(3)JKJ75

..... , exhibits non-application of mind. the power exercised by learned district magistrate cannot, thus, be justified, for, 'satisfaction' contemplated by section 8 of public safety act can be recorded only on the basis of some or the other material produced before such authority. in the absence of any material on records, the detaining authority ..... ground of detention deprives the petitioner of his right for making an effective representation against his detention thereby violating section 13 of jammu and kashmir public safety act and article 22(5) of the constitution of india.5. projecting his grievance against his illegal detention by district magistrate, udhampur, the petitioner says that ..... to the detenue, in public interest.4. the detaining authority has not exercised his powers under section 13(2) of the jammu and kashmir public safety act, 1978 to dispense with the requirement of serving the grounds of detention in public interest, in the present case, and that being the case the detention .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2006 (HC)

Vishwa Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-01-2006

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2096; I(2006)DMC574; RLW2006(2)Raj1123; 2006(2)WLC268

..... the accused.(3) that in exercising his jurisdiction under section 227 of the code the judge which under the present code is a senior and experienced court cannot act merely as a post office or a mouthpiece of the prosecution, but has to consider the broad probabilities of the case, the total effect of the evidence and ..... 'grave suspicion' should connect the accused to the alleged crime.17. thus, there are differences between 'taking of cognizance and 'framing of charge'. of course, both the acts require the application of judicious mind. however, the former is done without hearing both the parties. cognizance is taken without the accused being heard. the latter is done after ..... one. relying on the case of union of india v. prafulla kumar samal and anr. : 1979crilj154 , he has argued that while framing the charge the court should act neither as the mouthpiece of the prosecution, nor as a post office for them. in order to examine whether the ingredients of a particular offence exist or not, the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //