Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Page 99 of about 24,707 results (0.143 seconds)

Jul 06 2016 (HC)

Sakthi Vs. Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Others

Court : Chennai

..... default, it is always open to the 1st respondent to take proceedings as against the 3rd respondent including attachment and auction their property or to proceed under the revenue recovery act. 6. in view of the fact that disconnection of water connection for the default made by the 3rd respondent is not sustainable, the 1st respondent is directed to restore the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 2016 (HC)

S. Arumugam, Deputy Manager (Marketing) (Retired), Chennai Vs. The Man ...

Court : Chennai

..... petitioner that this is a very crucial fact that ought to have been necessarily considered and non-consideration of the same would clearly show that the disciplinary authority has not acted fairly. it is also his submission that is only due to the superintendence of the superior officials, it was to be done and he has no role in the actual .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 2016 (HC)

Senthil Kumar @ Mudikondan and Others Vs. State by The Inspector of Po ...

Court : Chennai

..... caused the death of the deceased in a gruesome manner. going by the motive, number of injuries caused, weapons used and all the other attending circumstances, we hold that the act of these accused would squarely fall within the first limb of section 300 i.p.c., and therefore, they are liable to be punished for offence under section 302 i .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 2016 (HC)

Anandakumar Vs. State by Inspector of Police, Erode

Court : Chennai

..... single stab would go to show that he had no intention to kill the deceased. there was also no motive. the occurrence was not a pre-meditated one. thus, the act of the accused would squarely fall under third limb of section 300 ipc. therefore, the accused is liable to be punished for offence under section 304(i) i.p.c ..... prosecution. 17. having come to the said conclusion, now we have to examine the question as to "what was the offence that was committed by the accused by the said act?". admittedly, there was no enmity between the deceased and the accused. after all, the deceased, p.ws.1 and 2 and the accused were all vendors of eatables in the ..... to pickpocket. p.w.11 therefore slapped the accused. the deceased raja also slapped him. then they dispersed from the place of occurrence. the accused was enraged over the above act of the deceased in telling p.w.11 that it was he who attempted to pick pocket. this is said to be the motive for the occurrence. b) around 6 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2016 (HC)

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Express Transport Vs. The Supe ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

(prayer: civil miscellaneous appeal filed under section 173 of motor vehicle act, 1988, to set aside the decree and judgment dated 24.07.2006 and made in m.c.o.p.no.1814 of 2000, on the file of the motor accident .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2016 (HC)

R. Ravi Vs. The Deputy Director, Union of India, Chennai and Another

Court : Chennai

..... support of this writ petition, avers as follows:- [a] the 1st respondent had registered ecir no.cezo/3/2013 [aps] under the prevention of money laundering act, 2002 [central act 15 of 2013 - in short pmla ] against the petitioner and his four minor children, namely, harshavardhan, aged about 13 years, dharanidharan, aged about 17 years ..... service. [3] notwithstanding anything in sub-regulation [2], a summon or notice may be communicated through electronic mode as provided in section 13 of the information technology act, 2000 [21 of 2000] and transmission of such communication shall be regarded as valid service. 16. as per regulation no.13, in the adjudicating authority [procedure] ..... relevant to extract the same:- 11. power regarding summons, production of documents and evidence etc.,:- [1] the adjudicating authority shall, for the purposes of this act, have the same powers as are vested in a civil court under the code of civil procedure, 1908 [5 of 1908] while trying a suit in respect .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2016 (HC)

S. Tamilselvan and Others Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by th ...

Court : Chennai

..... the author, but also to issue appropriate directions to the respondents by framing guidelines as to how the state agencies or officials should respond and act in situations where extra-judicial organisations/individuals threaten the exercise of free speech by individuals. there were also prayers made to provide police protection to victims ..... go on record to state that the novel also attracts offences under section 3(1)(x) of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989 as the novel contains several dialogues naming scheduled caste persons as chaklis and parayas . the state 64. the district collector, district revenue officer and ..... tamil nadu) which often decree or encourage honour killings or other atrocities in an institutionalized way were required to be ruthlessly stamped out as encouraging acts of barbarism and feudal mentality. the question thus which required to be posed is whether the state police machinery could have possibly prevent such an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2016 (HC)

K. Rajagopalan and Others Vs. Srinivasa Engineering Works, represented ...

Court : Chennai

..... the ipc case from the file of the chief judicial magistrate court, bhatinada, punjab, to the metropolitan magistrate court, new delhi, where, the prosecution under section 138 of the act is pending. 17. mr. b. kumar, placing reliance upon the judgment of the supreme court in kewal krishan vs. suraj bhan and another [1980 (supp.) scc 499 ..... the objective may be. 25. it is always open to sri srinivasa engineering works to approach the supreme court for transfer of the case under section 138 of the act from karnataka to salem, tamil nadu, since transfer jurisdiction of superior courts is entirely different from original jurisdiction of trial courts. 26. in the result, the order ..... before the high court of karnataka. it is also open to the parties to approach the supreme court seeking transfer of the prosecution under section 138 of the act from karnataka to the file of judicial magistrate court no.ii, mettur, salem, tamil nadu. taking advantage of the transfer ordered by this court, it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2016 (HC)

The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission Vs. V. Jayasutha

Court : Chennai

(Prayer: Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order dated 18.06.2014 made in W.P.No.3409 of 2014.) Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. This appeal by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission is against the order of the learned single Judge in accepting the case of the respondent/writ petitioner to consider her for appointment by extending the benefit of reservation for having studied in the Tamil medium. It appears that in the Combined Subordinate Services Examination-I, the respondent/writ petitioner, having applied for the post, also made a mention in the application that she had studied in Tamil medium, but did produce the said certificate, however, sought to produce the said certificate at the time of certificate verification and thus, relying upon the Division Bench judgments of this Court in the case of K.Arun Sabhapathy v. Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission rep.by its Secretary, Chennai and others reported in (2009) 3 ML...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2016 (HC)

M. Ramanathan Vs. The Secretary to Government, Environment and Forest ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the first respondent relating to G.O.(1-D) No.310, Environment and Forest Department, dated 16.10.2009 and quash the same.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed, challenging the order passed by the first respondent, vide G.O.(1-D) No.310, Environment and Forest Department, dated 16.10.2009, wherein the punishment inflicted on the petitioner has been confirmed, dismissing the revision petition filed against the order passed by the appellate authority, dated 20.08.2008. 2. The brief facts that are necessary for the disposal of this Writ Petition follows as under: 2.1. The petitioner was serving in the Forest Department from 08.04.1974 to 31.10.2009. When he was serving as Forest Ranger at Gandamanur Range, Madurai Forest Division, for the period from 21.10.1997 to 05.05.1998, the petitioner detected the Ganja cultivation at Kamankal area, within his ran...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //