Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... its customers which involved much more than a simple transfer of a piece of immovable property it is clear that the same constituted "service" within the meaning of the act. it was not a case where the appellant-company was selling the given property with all advantages and/or disadvantages on "as is where is" basis, as was ..... members with an assurance of development of infrastructure/amenities, lay-out approvals etc. was a "service" within the meaning of clause (o) of section 2(1) of the act and would, therefore, be amenable to the jurisdiction of the for a established under the statute. having regard to the nature of the transaction between the appellant- company and ..... relief or specific performance or contractual obligations are conferred on the civil court. the complaint is not a consumer as defined under sec.2(1)(d) of c.p.act. the opposite party does not render any services to the complainant for consideration and if at all the service is rendered by the opposite party, it is without .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... construction and ownership) rules,1987 provides for provision of fire protection requirement to the building more than 15 mts in height . section 13 of ap fire service act, 1999 reads as under:- 1. any person proposing to construct a building of more than 15 meters height for commercial/ business purpose, 18 meters and ..... advertisement with false promise to lure the needy prospective buyers. this would also be unfair trade practice as provided under section 2(1) of the consumer protection act. such brochure also gives undue advantage to the builder vis- -vis other builders. hence, the said contention cannot be accepted . 41. the specifications mentioned in ..... material facts. 32. the certificate of registration bearing document number 971 of 2010 would show that the complainant association is registered under the andhra pradesh societies act, 2001 on 2.12.2010. the complainant association has not filed its byelaws despite the challenge as to the maintainability of the complaint on the aspect .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... it equally casts a duty on the redressal agencies to enforce compliance under the conferred sanction of imprisonment and fine, if necessary. the provisions of the act would be rendered otiose and the entire purpose of the statute might stand wholly frustrated if the final substantive orders of the redressal agencies were not enforced ..... high court has no jurisdiction to deal with matter against order of commission and statutory appeal is provided and lies to this court under provisions of consumer protection act. the high court has not exercised its jurisdiction in accordance with law. 12) in ravi kant vs. national consumer disputes redressal commission reported in air ..... forum, state commission or national commission as the case may be. the learned counsel for the complainants further contended that section 27 of the c.p. act can be filed against any order either interlocutory or final which has not been complied with. 10) merely because petitioner/mpl has preferred appeals before the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... the legal rights of others, should not be permitted to take advantage of his wrong or manipulations. in the present case respondents 2 and 3 and the appellant have acted together while disposing off the hypothecated goods, and now, they cannot be permitted to turn back to argue, that since the goods have been sold, liability cannot ..... on facts recorded by the courts below are acceptable on evidence, law does not permit such evidence in view of proviso (4) to section 92 of the evidence act. it follows that findings on facts recorded by the courts below on such inadmissible and irrelevant evidence become illegal. in the absence of regular conveyance by properly stamped ..... of the courts below. but it is not an absolute rule. some of the well recognized exceptions are where (i) the courts below have ignored material evidence or acted on no evidence; (ii) the courts have drawn wrong inferences from proved facts by applying the law erroneously; or (iii) the courts have wrongly cast the burden of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... of the deceased or cause anguish to his relatives and as such the doctor should maintain secrecy. (14) the medical examination for taking out life insurance policy is a voluntary act by the examinee and therefore, consent to the disclosure of the finding may be taken as implied. according to the opposite parties, the result of the test is indeterminate and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... even though the remedy by way of a suit would be time-barred. placing reliance on the decision of the privy council in hansraj gupta v. dehra dun mussoorie electric trampway co. ltd.6 and the decisions in new delhi municipal committee v. kalu ram7 and punjab natioinal bank v. surendera prasad sinha8 the ..... within the period of limitation the liability against him having been crystallized on 28.3.1990, the proceedings initiated against the petitioner under the revenue recovery act are barred by limitation and without jurisdiction. as already stated the supreme court in maharashtra state financial corporation v. ashok k. agarwal and others categorically ..... of the dues by sale of mortgaged properties within limitation. the further proceedings for realization of the balance amount by taking recourse to the revenue recovery act is only continuation of the process of recovery proceedings initiated earlier. therefore, the contention of the petitioner that the claim of the 1st respondent corporation .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... the complainant several times informed the surveyor about the certificates issued by different agencies and despite that the surveyor instructed the complaint to do the impossible act. the complainant addressed several letters to the opposite party on 14.9.2010 and the opposite party requested the complainant to furnish estimate for repairing the ..... was not objectively considered by the opposite party. the grounds of repudiation are not sustainable for improper appreciation of the claim. 11. the complainant under rti act sought for the documents from the opposite party company which was rejected on 13.5.2011, the opposite party exhibited vindictiveness against the complainant. the ..... subject matter is different from what is mentioned in the insurance policy. in the month of may, 2011 the complainant applied for surveyors report under rti act and the opposite party refused to issue it to the complainant. on 1.9.2011 the investigator submitted report stating that the complainant has not .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... amounted to voluntarily giving up the membership of indian national congress party. according to the writ petitioner, his allegiance to the indian national congress party is unquestionable as he never acted against the interest of the party nor voted or abstained from voting on any occasion in the council contrary to any of the directions issued by the indian national congress ..... assembly12, the question as to when does a person "voluntarily give up" his membership of such political party as provided in para-2 (1) (a) was explained as under: "the act of voluntarily giving up the membership of the political party may be either express or implied. when a person who has been thrown out or expelled from the party which .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. No. 37621 o04. 01.2013 Mirza Khusru Ali Baig and others The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,rep. by its Commissioner & another Counsel for the petitioners: Sri N. Ashwani Kumar Counsel for Respondent No.1: Dr. Y. Padmavathi Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sri M.A.K. Mukheed HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1. AIR 195.Supreme Cour2. (1970) 1 Supreme Court Case3. AIR 195.Supreme Cour4. AIR 195.Supreme Cour5. AIR 195.A.P....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. No. 37621 o04. 01.2013 Mirza Khusru Ali Baig & others The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Commissioner & another Counsel for the petitioners: Sri N. Ashwani Kumar Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Dr. Y. Padmavathi Counsel for Respondent No.2 : Sri M.A.K. Mukheed HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1. AIR 195.Supreme Cour2. (1970) 1 Supreme Court Case3. AIR 195.Supreme Cour4. AIR 195.Supreme Cour5. AIR 195.A.P....
Tag this Judgment!