Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Sorted by: recent Court: andhra pradesh Page 91 of about 12,635 results (0.065 seconds)

Feb 06 2013 (HC)

D.Bapu Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... court, hyderabad against the judgment, dated 19.12.2005, whereby and whereunder the appellant was convicted for the offence under section 7 of prevention of corruption act, 1988 (for short, 'the act') and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and fine of rs.1000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for three (3) months, and ..... his evidence that the appellant was authorized by his predecessor to operate bank transactions and that on account of the transfer of the accountant, the appellant was acting as an assistant accountant and was looking after the subsidy transactions of bio-gas plants. he also stated that on 10.09.1999, the appellant brought the ..... of imprisonment passed by the trial court against the appellant for the offences under sections 7 and 13(1)(d) punishable under section 13(2) of the act is reduced to one year.19. accordingly, the criminal appeal is partly allowed confirming the conviction passed by the principal special judge for spe & acb cases-cum .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2013 (TRI)

The Branch Manager M/S Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited, Rep. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... the complainant which is illegal and submitted that how the dues of rs.1,03,292/- had become rs.5 lakhs within 3 months without any valid reason and the act of the opposite party in seizing the vehicle is illegal. hence the complaint for a direction to the opposite party to issue loan clearance certificate and also re-endorse the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2013 (HC)

V. Parvathalu S/O. Mallaiah, H.No.2-3-19 Vs. the Municipal Council, Ka ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... filed a counter affidavit in the matter. it is stated in paragraph 3 of the said counter affidavit that the petitioner without serving a notice as contemplated under the act before commencement of the work, completed the construction. it is also specifically alleged in the said paragraph as under: "...... this hon'ble court in wpmp no.459 ..... applicant is also required to submit a copy of the title deed of the land duly attested by a gazetted officer of the government. section 211 of the act prohibits construction or reconstruction of a building unless and until the commissioner has granted permission for execution of the work. section 212 required the commissioner, by order in ..... has been initiated against the petitioner herein. it has all through been maintaining that the petitioner has made constructions without complying with the requirements of section 214 of the act read with rules 9(2), 9(4) and 9(7) of the building rules. hence, the above judgment is of not much help to the petitioner's .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2013 (TRI)

The Divisional Manager United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Sanga V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... till payment together with compensation of rs. 5,000/- and costs of rs. 1,000/- filed the above application u/s 15 of the consumer protection act read with section 5 of the limitation act to condone delay of 10 days on the ground that copy of the order was received by it through its counsel at dist. forum on 9.10 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2013 (TRI)

Hdfc Bank Limited Rep. by Its Manager (Car Loans) Vs. Yarlagadda Krish ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... act and the proceedings under the arbitration act instituted by the opposite party. 10. the honble national commission in instalment supply ltd vs kangra ex-seviceman transport co. and another i ( ..... is contended on behalf of the opposite party that once the arbitrator has passed the award, it becomes enforceable under section 36 of the arbitration act. it is submitted that there would be a conflict of jurisdiction in relation to the proceedings instituted by the complainant under the provisions of the consumer protection ..... forum, then he cannot be denied relief by invoking section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 act. moreover, the plain language of section 3 of the consumer act makes it clear that the remedy available in that act is in addition to and not in derogation of the provisions of any other law for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2013 (TRI)

R. Narasimha Reddy Vs. Kuchakula Surendar Reddy and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... and interpreted the law accordingly. 7) as seen from the record, the petitioner though approached the appellate authority i.e., national commission as provided under the consumer protection act against the order of this commission, however for reasons not known has withdrawn them. so also he approached the high court and again withdrew the writ petition as ..... with, the complainants filed ea no. 12/2011 in cc 2/2010 and ea no. 13/2011 in cc 3/2010 u/s 27 of the consumer protection act on 12.9.2011 to punish the opposite parties for non-compliance of the order dt. 9.3.2011. 4) the petitioner/op3 himself averred in his affidavit ..... kashinath karekar reported in 2012 (2) ald 146 (sc) where their lordships elaborately considered the provisions of the consumer protection act, and after relying several decisions held: 36. on careful analysis of the provisions of the act, it is abundantly clear that the tribunals are creatures of the statute and derive their power from the express provisions of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2013 (HC)

N.Sankar Reddy. Vs. N.Rami Reddy (Died) and Others.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... steps to bring the legal representatives of the deceased-1st respondent on record. he contends that since i.a.no.341 of 2003 filed under section 5 of the limitation act with a prayer to condone the delay in filing l.r. petition was dismissed way back on 02.07.2003, the present application is not maintainable. the various developments, that ..... did make an effort to bring the legal representatives of rami reddy on record. since there was delay, he filed i.a.no.341/2003 under section 5 of limitation act. however, that was strongly opposed by the respondents 3 to 9 and the same was dismissed by the trial court through its order, dated 02.07.2003. thereafter, respondents 3 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2013 (TRI)

N. Shashank Reddy Vs. Dr. Svss Prasad, Medical Oncologist, Apollo Hops ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... the standard initial medical treatment for almost all patients with an intracranial lesion identified on neuroimaging. they rapidly relieve symptoms, often within hours, by reducing perilesional edema. however, cortico steroids act as a chemotherapeutic agent in patients with pcnsl. thus, cortico steroids can cause regression or even complete disappearance of a pcnsl lesion, occasionally within days (fig.1). institution of steroid .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2013 (TRI)

N. Ramakrishna Vs. M. Sudhakar Chairman and Managing Director Janachai ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Order: (Smt. M. Shreesha, Incharge President) Aggrieved by the order in CC 57/2012 on the file of District Forum-I, Hyderabad, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant joined as a member in the scheme floated by the opposite party for allotment of 200 sq. yds. and paid Rs.40,000/- on 21-5-98 and 27-5-1998 respectively as initial deposit and was issued a passbook No.276 and thereafter the complainant made the payments as per the scheme. The opposite parties sent letters on 26-9-1998, 30-12-1998, 22-6-99 and 31-12-1999 whenever there was any lapse in the payment of instalment. The complainant submits that he always responded to these letters and paid the instalments regularly and totally paid Rs.2,40,000/- by 25-6-2006 but the plot was not registered in his name. The complainant submits that as per point 4(e) of the terms and conditions, the opposite party should execute the sale agreement after making payment of Rs.1,00,0...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2013 (TRI)

K. Sanjeev Kumar Alias Kamma Sanjeeva Rao Vs. Krishna Institute of Med ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... the complainant was irregular in getting treatment and also reviewed his case. the complainant did not file any application to condone the delay u/s. 24-a of consumer protection act. in such circumstances, the contention of the complainant that from the date of disclosure by dr. ravi kanth ie from 13.2.2008 the complaint is within limitation could not .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //