Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Court: karnataka Page 12 of about 14,095 results (0.058 seconds)

Kamala Bai Tebha Vs. Kalpana and Another

Court : Karnataka

..... such orders. in the present case, the appellants (the husband and his relatives, accused under sections 498-a read with section 34 ipc and sections 3 and 4, dowry prohibition act, 1961) had not sought compounding of the offences. they had approached the high court under section 482 of cr.pc for quashing of the criminal proceedings. the high court ought ..... before the court and they filed a joint memo stating that they have compounded the offences punishable u/s.498a of ipc and sections 3 and 4 of dowry prohibition act. 3. it is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner that the first respondent has filed a criminal case against her husband by name dilip tebha and also against the .....

E. Thimmappa and Another Vs. Roopa Thimmappa and Another

Court : Karnataka

..... son are residing. in the event of allowing the said petition for divorce, comprehensive permanent alimony could be awarded by the court under section 25 of the hindu marriage act. admittedly smt.roopa and her son are residing with her mother at bangalore. her mother is also depending on her due to ailments and at present, she cannot think ..... allegations. roopa has filed a petition before the family court in m.c.3323/14 seeking restitution of conjugal rights in terms of section 9 of the family courts act. another suit filed by thimmappa requesting the trial court to restrain his wife from meeting his family members and not to visit his place, is pending. an execution ..... roopa has filed a petition for transfer of the said case to bangalore. 3. roopa had filed a petition under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, on 29.4.2011 seeking monthly maintenance of rs.5,000/-and compensation of rs.5,00,000/-. 4. the said petition was decided and ultimately allowed, .....

State by Maddur Police, Mandya District Vs. Moorthy Alias Pungi

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1683; II(2002)DMC309; 2002(3)KarLJ351

..... gravamen of any charge under the act is inextricably linked to the social vice, namely, demand for dowry. what mr. chouta vehemently submitted was that normally, it would be essential that the party ..... amount. consequently, he has submitted that the learned trial judge was clearly in error in having recorded the order of acquittal under section 3 of the said act. 4. an interesting submission has been canvassed by the respondent's learned advocate who first submitted that the entire concept of receipt of dowry which is the ..... was charged for having committed offence punishable under sections 498-a, 304-b and 306 of the ipc and under sections 3 and 7 of the dowry prohibition act. the learned trial judge after consideration of the prosecution evidence recorded the verdict that none of the offences have been established and acquitted the accused. the state has .....

Basappa Vs. IndraGouda and Others

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... for the respondents would contend that even though there is no specific acquittal of the accused of the offences punishable under sections 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act, the same can be inferred from the contends of the judgment. the accused having been acquitted of the offences punishable under section 143, 304b, 498a and 302 ..... instant case, there is no acquittal granted to the accused with reference to charge no.4, namely the offences under sections 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act read with section 149 of the indian penal code. 12. in an identical circumstance, the honourable supreme court, in the case of state of andhra pradesh versus gowthu ..... accused for the offences punishable under sections 143, 498a, 304b read with section 149 of the indian penal code and section 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act. the case was committed to trial. the accused pleaded not guilty. in order to prove its case, the prosecution examined seventeen witnesses and marked fourteen exhibits along .....

Town Municipal Council (by Chief Officer), Nippani Vs. Ramachandra Dat ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1969)ILLJ645Kant; (1968)2MysLJ407

..... in that case. the enunciation that the delay which could be condoned under the minimum wages act could not exceed the period of limitation prescribed by the limitation act, depended almost entirely upon the decision of the privy council in hansraj gupta v. official liquidators of dehra dun, etc., company [i.l.r. 54 all. 1067] in which the question was ..... whether an order could be made under s. 186(1) of the indian companies act, 1930, directing a contributory to pay a debt, suit for the recovery of which ..... had claimed in an application which they had previously made overtime wages for the period between 1 april, 1955 and 30 september, 1956. the authority functioning under the act gave them those wages by an order made on 25 july, 1958. but, for the subsequent period to which the second application relates the claim was not made .....

itc Limited Corporate Head Quarters, and ors. Vs. Union of India by It ...

Court : Karnataka

..... . subsequently the wakf board gave a request to the fifth respondent, competent officer to initiate proceeding against the petitioners under the provisions of public premises act. accordingly fifth respondent issued notice on 03.07.1981 to the petitioners as per annexure-l. the petitioners being aggrieved by the resolution passed by ..... recognizes a restriction being introduced by another law, the question of repugnancy does not arise. section 16 of karnataka public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act takes away the jurisdiction of the civil courts to try matters relating to recovery of registered wakf properly. therefore, there is no question of repugnancy. further ..... objections filed by the petitioner in so far as the jurisdiction of the authority in initiating the proceedings under the provisions of the public premises act as a preliminary issue and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. the competent authority after hearing the arguments on both the side passed .....

Mylarappa S/O D.J.Lingappa Vs. the State of Karnataka by Town Police C ...

Court : Karnataka

..... crime no.315/2010 of chitradurga town ps., registered for the offences punishable undersections 498-a, 304e r/w 34 i.p.c. and section 3 & 4 of dowry prohibition act, he shall be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of rs.25,000/ offering a surety for the like sum.2) petitioner shall not intimidate .....

Dr. Meenakshi and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Rep. by Its Chief Sec ...

Court : Karnataka

..... and for the making and execution of town planning scheme in the states. therefore, the then mysore legislature enacted the karnataka town and country planning act, 1961, karnataka act no.11 of 1963 providing for the regulation of planned growth of land use and development and for the making and the execution of the town ..... also produced. the bda prepared the revised master plan-2015 (rmp-2015 for short) in accordance with section 12 of the karnataka town and country planning act, 1961 (ktcp act). in the said plan, the provision was made for 30metre road or 100 ft. road from yeshwanthpura circle to cauvery junction. the state government has approved ..... the bda prepared the revised comprehensive development plan-1995 (rcdp-1995 for short) in accordance with then prevailing section 25 of the karnataka town and country planning act, 1961 (ktcp act). in the said plan, the provision was made for 30 metre road or 100 ft. road from yeshwanthpura circle to cauvery junction. the state govt. has .....

Tata Projects Limited, Rep. by Its Company Secretary and Another Vs. K ...

Court : Karnataka

..... with regard to the maintainability of these petitions at this stage. 'kpcl' more particularly has made detailed reference to the karnataka transparency in public procurements act, 1999 ('ktpp act' for short) and has contended that no cause has arisen for filing the instant petition. the said objections are filed insofar as maintainability and have ..... ktpp rules, 2000, to point out that the tender inviting authority should ensure confidentiality of the process of tender evaluation. though the said provision cannot act as a bar to provide information to this court, certainly in the evaluation process, such confidentiality requires to be maintained to prevent the tenderers from interfering ..... effecting the right. the exception however would be when it is shown that the decision making process itself is so arbitrary and irrational, that no authority acting reasonably will take such decision to the extent it is taken. even in such case, the courts would only peruse the decisions taken by experts .....

Vodafone South Limited and Another Vs. the Deputy Director of Income T ...

Court : Karnataka

..... on this basis, petitioner submits, belgacom has accordingly transferred the above capacity to the petitioner and such transfer does not invoke the provisions of the income tax act for any services by belgacom to the petitioner. 8. according to the petitioner, payments made to belgacom are not income' either arising or accruing in india ..... commissioner of income tax (appeals) before the tribunal. the tribunal, instead of considering the grounds urged with reference to the relevant provisions of the income tax act, has unjustifiably held the petitioner had made out no prima facie case to stay in entirety the impugned orders at annexures-a and b. 19. reiterating his ..... definition of "previous year" envisages a different previous year in respect of each separate source of income. sec.4, which concerned with the application of the act, declares that the total income of the person includes all profits and gains, from whatever source derived, which falls within the categories set out there.' the .....