Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 14,087 results (0.052 seconds)

Jun 28 1995 (HC)

Shivappa Vs. Keriyamma

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1996KAR263; 1995(5)KarLJ415

..... daughter of balindrappa and that the first defendant is the validly adopted son of balindrappa. in view of the provisions of hindu succession act, it held that the respective shares of the parties would be 1/3 each and accordingly allowed the appeal declaring that the ..... first appellate court should not have decreed the suit: i think there is no substance in this contention. section 132 of the act does not provide for dismissal of the suit but provides only for rejection of the plaint or for return of the plaint. this ..... when the plaint was filed, certified copy of the record of rights should have been filed and section 132 of the karnataka land revenue act provides that if certified copy of the record of rights is not filed the plaint shall be rejected. therefore, when it has not ..... injury to any suit/or has been laid down by cairns, l.c. in rodger v. compitoir d escompte de paris., 1871 (3) pc 465. this decision has been followed by hon'ble supreme court in many cases including the one in jagat .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 22 1993 (HC)

Harikumar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : I(1994)DMC356; ILR1993KAR3035; 1994(3)KarLJ335

..... a is offensive of article 14. this point too is no longer res integra. when the legislature indicates a statutory presumption in respect of certain act or acts or a burden of proof upon certain persons, the statute cannot be challenged as discriminatory if the rule of evidence has a rational relation to the ..... instance to look at the relevant provisions of the act. the act was enacted in 1961 by the parliament. the statement of objects and reasons underlying the said enactment, reads as under: 'the object of this bill ..... , the impugned provision is in no way unconstitutional. learned advocates of respective parties have invited our attention to number of judgments and relevant provisions of other acts dealing with criminal offences, for supporting their respective contentions. 4. for resolving the aforesaid controversy posed for our consideration, it will apposite in the first .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 2024 (HC)

M/s Power Smart Media Pvt Ltd Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... s. power smart media private limited also known as m/s. power smart media (opc) private limited power tv trademark holder incorporated and registered under companies act, 1956 represented by its director dabbegatta gowda madhu lakshmana din number:08262. 81 no.7, 11th main, mathikere main road1t stage, gokula extension yeshwanthpur bengaluru - ..... 2. m/s. mitcon infraprojects pvt. ltd power tv: permitted company under ministry of information and broadcasting incorporated and registered under companies act, 1956 represented by its director mr. shrikant mitesh bhangdiya din number0262816 b-61, floor-6, plot no.210 'b' wing, mittal tower free press ..... media private limited also known as m/s. power smart media (opc) private limited power tv trade mark holder incorporated and registered under companies act, 1956 represented by its director dabbegatta gowda madhu lakshmana din number0826281 no.7, 11th main mathikere main road1t stage, gokula extension yeshwanthpur bengaluru 560 054 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2023 (HC)

Sharanappa S/o Basappa Matur Vs. Mohammad Ali S/o Dawalsab Chittaragi ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... of its judgment that, the trial court completely overlooked the provisions and failed to appreciate the statutory presumption drawn under sections 118 and 139 of n.i. act. the statute mandates that once the signature of an accused on the cheque is established, then these reverse onus clauses become operative. in such a situation, ..... crl.a no.200030 of 2017 20. whenever execution of negotiable instruments is admitted, then, the court may draw presumption under section 118 of the n.i. act, which reads as under:"118 presumptions as to negotiable instruments. until the contrary is proved, the following presumptions shall be made: (a) of consideration that every ..... capacity to lend loan and the amount due is not legally recoverable debt, accordingly, acquitted the accused without drawing presumption available under section 139 of n.i. act. it is contended that, the complainant has discharged initial burden casted upon him, but, the accused has not discharged the burden. the trial court has wrongly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2023 (HC)

Malathy. S. B. Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... consequent on his resignation, the deceased complains to the internal complaints committee constituted under the sexual harassment of women at workplace (prevention, prohibition and redressal) act, 2013 contending that he has been harassed by the petitioners. the 1st petitioner was issued with a show cause notice and called upon her to reply ..... deceased. the deceased then registers a complaint against the petitioners for offences punishable under the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989 (for short 1989 act ) and on the basis of the complaint, the petitioners were summoned to the police station where they said to have narrated all the ..... instances that had happened in the organization concerning the deceased. it is then the complaint becomes a crime for the offences punishable under the 1989 act. the subject petition does not concern the said crime.5. the deceased then approaches the assistant commissioner of police complaining that he has been harassed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 2023 (HC)

Kanchan India Limited Vs. Karnataka Power Corporation Limited

Court : Karnataka

..... the following contentions: (cid:1) the impugned action of recalling the original tender is contrary to section 14 of the karnataka transparency in public procurement act, 1999 ( the act for short); (cid:1) the impugned order does not indicate any reason as to why the tender has been recalled; (cid:1) the ..... shashikiran shetty k., sr.advocate a/w sri manu kulkarni, advocate) 2 and: karnataka power corporation limited a government company within the meaning of companies act, 2013 having its registered office as shakthi bhavan no.82, race course road bengaluru 560 001 represented by its authorised representative. ... respondent (by sri pramod nair ..... raj.) 311 001 represented by its authorized signatory mr.c.n.prahlada rao aged about76years.2. emta coal limited company within the meaning of company under companies act, 2013 having its registered office5, nandalal basu sarani kolkata 700 071 represented by its authorized signatory mr. somnath panth aged about45years. ... petitioners (by sri .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2016 (HC)

Shashidhar and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Bangalore

Court : Karnataka

..... similarly, comments, however strongly worded, expressing disapprobation of actions of the government without exciting those feelings which generate the inclination to cause public disorder by acts of violence would not be penal. it is held that disloyalty to government established by law is not the same thing as commenting in strong terms ..... among the police force and the public in general. if not for the timely action by the state government in invoking the karnataka essential services maintenance act, 2013, in preventing any such precipitative action that was planned for 4.6.2016, the consequences of the petitioner's inflammatory and provocative speeches and ..... to have issued a notification dated 31.5.2016, declaring that the karnataka state police force as an essential service under the karnataka essential services maintenance act, 2013. however, it is claimed that this did not deter the petitioners from continuing with their onslaught through the various media to instigate and incite .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 2015 (HC)

Thaheer Nissar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... proposition as under: indian penal code, 1860, section 300- murder and robbery unexplained possession of stolen property by accused presumption that accused committed the offences can be raised. (indian evidence act, 1872, section 114(a)). ? 15. the trial court has extensively considered the oral and documentary evidence regarding the recovery of gold ornaments at the instance of the accused and has ..... . p.w.7-g.s. suresh has deposed in his evidence that on 3-2-2010 he was proceeding nearby mandi police station, the police called him and requested to act as panch witness. at that time, the accused before the court was in the police station; said accused took them in the police jeep to his house at akbar road .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 2015 (HC)

Devappa Halageri S/O Bheemeppa Halageri Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... hands he could turn into a criminal and wreck havoc on the civil society. 8 13. apart from the apprehensions, it is the duty cast upon the courts to act as a guardian of minor children. the safety and health of minor children is predominant. the right of an adult must necessarily cede to the right of a minor. ..... prosecution on registration of fir has indicted the accused for the offences punishable under sections 376 and 506 of i.p.c. and under section 4 of the pocso act. the accused was arrested and remanded to judicial custody. thereafter the investigation officer has moved an application and the learned public prosecutor seeking permission to conduct dna examination of ..... the order dated2310.2014 passed by the dist. & sessions judge, koppal, in fir (posco) no.373/2014, for the offences p/u/s376 506 of ipc and4of posco act, 2012. this petition coming on for admission this day, the court made the following: order this petition is filed by the accused praying to call for the records and set .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 2014 (HC)

Sri. Hanumappa Vs. Yallakka

Court : Karnataka

..... as well as in a number of countries abroad." scientific accurate 20 15. in india there is no special statute governing this. neither the criminal procedure code nor the evidence act empowers the court to direct such a test to be made. in 1951(1) madras law journal p.58o polavarapu venkteswarlu, minor by guardian and mother hanumamma ..... rather than paternity has to be determined before the court. fathers as well as mothers can apply for maintenance. therefore contests can include mothers denial of paternity. this act finally removed the legal aid for corroboration of mother's statement of paternity.12. two cases may be usefully referred to: re l lord denning m.r. [1968 ..... paternity increased. an attempt by way of statutory provision to make blood test compulsory in england failed in 1938. however, in 1957 the affiliation proceedings act was passed. under that act, it was assumed that a man was the father once a sexual relationship with the mother at the time of conception was proven unless he .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //