Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Court: karnataka dharwad Page 9 of about 721 results (0.049 seconds)

Sudhir Mohan Shetty Vs. Jyoti Devadas Varma

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... whether he had given such wrong information in the bio-data. 13. admittedly, the petition is filed under section 13(1)(ia) of the hindu marriage act. under the said provision, if the allegation of cruelty is proved by the party claiming, he/she shall be entitled for dissolution of his/her marriage. 14 ..... appellant and respondent lived separately. respondent filed the instant petition seeking divorce and dissolution of marriage during september 2013 under section 13(l)(ia) of the hindu marriage act, 1955. petition was resisted by filing statement of objections, denying petition averments, except solemnisation of marriage. after trial, on consideration of the material on record, ..... conditions for a hindu marriage are governed by section 5 of the hindu marriage act, 1956 and the ceremonies which solemnises a marriage is described in section 7 of the act. the registration of hindu marriages under section 8 of the act is for the purpose of facilitating the proof of hindu marriage. in paragraph 2 .....

M/S. Kamangar and Company Vs. M/S. A.L. Byahatti and Sons and Others

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Reported in : 2011ILR(Kar)1576

..... the plaintiff, who is a third party in view of section 32(3) of the act. 11. towards the amount due, cheque for rs.25,000/- (ex.p-5) was issued. the cheque was returned unhonoured (ex.p-6 ..... in the official gazette and the newspaper. it is clear that, no public notice as contemplated under sections 45(1) and 72 of the act has been issued and published. in the circumstances, the retirement of 3rd defendant, even if to be true, cannot affect the rights of ..... that, 3rd defendant was not a partner at the time of the transaction and also at the filing of the suit and hence, his acts and deeds are not binding on defendants 1, 2 and 4. it was stated that, 3rd defendant retired voluntarily from 1st defendant partnership ..... until public notice is given of the dissolution. the mode of giving notice has been laid down in section 72 of the act, which says that, a public notice has to be given by intimation to the registrar of firms under section 63 and by .....

Spic Southern Petrochemicals Industries Corporation Ltd. Vs. M/S A.K. ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... of limitation; (ii) if the complainant satisfies the court that there is sufficient cause in making complaint within the said period. 21. section 3 of the limitation act reads as under: bar of limitation (1) subject to the provisions contained in sections 4 to 24 (inclusive), every suit instituted, appeal preferred, and ..... no principle of interpretation of statues is more firmly settled than the rule that the court must deduce the intention of parliament from the words used in the act. applying such a rule, this court observed in s.narayanassamy vs. g. pannerselvam(4) that where the statues meaning is clear and explicit, words cannot ..... is required to be made for avoiding harassment to the hones drawers. 11. proviso to section 142 is added under amendment brought in to the negotiable instrument (amendment) act,2002. section 142 after amendment reads as follows: 142. cognizance of offences. notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure,1973 (2 of 1974), - .....

Rangappa and Others Vs. Nagappa and Others

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... of basawaraj vs. special land acquisition officer, there was inordinate delay of 5 years in filing the appeal under the provisions of section 54 of the land acquisition act, and the explanation offered for the delay in approaching the court at a belated stage has been that one of the appellant has taken ill. the supreme court ..... delay by enacting section 5 of the indian limitation act, 1963, in order to enable the courts to do substantial justice to the parties by disposing of matters on merits'. the expression sufficient cause employed by the legislature is ..... application for condonation of delay should have been granted by the lower appellate court. 17. the hon'ble supreme court while considering the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act in the case of collector (la) vs. katiji, reported in 1987 (2) scc 107 has held that: 3. the legislature has conferred the power to condone .....

National Insurance Company Limited, Hubli and Others Vs. Gangadhar and ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... d) light motor vehicle, (e) transport vehicle, (f) road roller and (g) motor vehicle of other specified description. the definition clause in section 2 of the act defines various categories of vehicles which are covered in broad types mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 10. they are goods carriage, heavy-goods vehicle, heavy passenger motor ..... for a period of 30 days. 10. one other development that is relevant is the amendment of sub-section (2) of section 10 by the motor vehicles (amendment) act, 1994 in the said section, the following kinds of vehicles were specified: .................. (e) medium goods vehicle, (f) medium passenger motor vehicle, (g) heavy goods vehicle ..... licence issued by the competent authority prescribed, authorizing a person to drive a motor vehicle of a specified class or description. 4. section 3 of the mv act prohibits a person from driving a transport vehicle , unless his driving licence specifically entitles him so to do. 5. a goods carriage is defined as any .....

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Maruti and Another

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... provision of chapter- x shall also apply in relation to any claim for compensation in respect of death or permanent disablement of any person under the workmen's compensation act, 1923, resulting from an accident of the nature referred to under sub-section (1) of section 140 and for this purpose, the said provisions shall, with ..... is being let in to demonstrate the relationship between the claimant and the 1st respondent, as employee and employer, and hence the claim petition under the said act is not maintainable. 6. the commissioner has formulated issue no.1, which relates to adjudicating the issue as to whether the claimant is a workman as defined ..... the commissioner for workmen's compensation is justified in saddling the liability on the appellant insurance company against the provision of section 140 and 143 of m.v. act 1988? b) whether the commissioner for workmen's compensation is justified in coming to a conclusion that the injuries caused to the petitioner were in the course of .....

Dr. Chandrama Kanagali Vs. The State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... ). therefore, annexure 'p' is legal and valid. it is stated, the state government is the competent authority in appoint the registrar. no where in the act there is any prohibition to the vice chancellor to make recruitments, take policy or financial decisions as alleged by the petitioner. under a special circumstance a direction has ..... within the stipulated time to the examination confidential section thereby the petitioner has failed to discharge her duties properly. it amounts to misconduct. the petitioner was acting as the chair person of english department and boe. therefore, the petitioner was the lawful custodian of all the answer scripts and she has not returned ..... 5th respondent has been appointed as registrar of karnataka university, dharwad, in the place of the petitioner by exercising power under section 17(1) of the act. therefore, the impugned order does not call for interference. 27. it is stated, pursuant to the impugned order the 5th respondent has assumed charge as registrar .....

Shashikala W/o Narayan Kadam @ Dhor Vs. Laxman Yadu Kadam @ Dhor

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... to the case on hand as pw-1 is otherwise competent to depose on behalf of original plaintiff who is her husband in view of section 120 of the evidence act.16. accordingly, substantial question of law referred to supra is answered in negative.17. consequently, the following order is passed: order appeal is merit less and hereby dismissed. sd/- ..... .11. in order to appreciate the same, it is just and necessary for this court to culled out section 120 of the evidence act, which reads as under: - 11 - rsa no.1832 of 2005"120. parties to civil suit, and their wives or husbands, husband or wife of person under criminal trial. in ..... gone into by this court in order to appreciate the substantial question of law. when such an exercise is carried out, in view of section 120 of the indian evidence act, even in the absence of power of attorney or its validity pw-1 being the wife of the plaintiff, was competent enough to depose on behalf of the original plaintiff .....

Dr Patil Shashi D/o Channabasanagouda Patil Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

- 1 - WP No.104846 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022 PRESENT R THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA WRIT PETITION No.104846 OF2022(S-KAT) BETWEEN: DR. PATIL SHASHI D/O CHANNABASANAGOUDA PATIL AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. DISTRICT HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE OFFICER, DHARWAD, R/O. PLOT No.140, 1ST CROSS, SRINAGAR, UTB DHARWAD58000 TQ. AND DIST. DHARWAD PETITIONER (BY SRI. A S PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SERVICES, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU56000.2. THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OPF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SERVICES ANAND RAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU56000.3. THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SERVICES, ANAND RAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU56000.-. 2 - WP No.104846 of 2022 4. DR. BASANAGOUDA S/O CHANDRUGOUDA KARIGOUDAR AGE. 51 YEARS, OCC. SENIOR MEDICAL OFFICER, TALUKA CIVIL HOSPITAL, NARAGUND5...

Dr. Mahantesh S/o Gadigeppa Mudenoor Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH R DATED THIS THE11h DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.101169 OF2018(S-RES) BETWEEN: DR. MAHANTESH S/O GADIGEPPA MUDENOOR AGED ABOUT39YEARS OCC: TECHNICAL ASSISTANT KRISHI VIGYANA KENDRA, INDI, VIJAYAPUR UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES R/O: NO.6, SY. NO.61/2 SHRUSTI DWELLINGS NEAR KHB LAYOUT DODDANAYAKANAKOPPA DHARWAD 580 008. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASHANT S.KADADEVAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU. 2 . UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES (UAS) DHARWAD, BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2 3 . DR.SANTOSH G. P., AGED ABOUT37YEARS OCC: ASSISTANT PROFESSOR RURAL HOME SCIENCE COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES DHARWAD. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MADANAMOHAN M. KHANNUR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. RAMACHANDRA A. MAHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. V.M.SHEELAVANT, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227...