Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Court: karnataka dharwad Page 11 of about 721 results (0.030 seconds)

Jun 24 2022 (HC)

The University Of Agricultural Sciences Vs. Sri Dr Digambarappa S/o Pa ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... the second question regarding powers of the state government to give directions to the universities are concerned, despite turning of each page of the universities act both by the learned advocate-general as also the counsel appearing for the petitioners and the university, no provision could be located under which the ..... the norm for appointments of the kind is not demonstrated. learned counsel could not secure any support from the reading of section 8 & 10 of the act to substantiate his contention that the government has power to issue such instructions. section 8 gives some power, arguably true; however prescribed conditions & circumstances for ..... having perused the appeal papers, we are inclined to grant indulgence in the matter for the following reasons: a) section 24 of the universities of agricultural sciences act, 2009 enlists officers of the university which, inter alia, comprise of directors & deans. section 30 empowers the vice-chancellor to appoint officers specified in clauses .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 2014 (HC)

dr.shrishail Ramakrishna Bijapure Vs. Vidya

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... shivaraj dharmoji belavadi, house no.115, vijay nagar, golden park, hubli. .. respondent (by sri.vijay malali & sri.sadanand kalaburgi, advs.) this petition is filed under section194) of the family court act, against the judgment and order dated2111.2013, in crl.misc.no.154/2012, on the file of the principal judge, family court, hubli, partly allowing the petition filed under section125of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2024 (HC)

Dr.lata Krishnaraddi Mankali Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... : (1) notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) any person (including the child), who has apprehension that an offence under this act is likely to be committed or has knowledge that such an offence has been committed, he shall provide such information to,-- (a) the special juvenile police unit (b) ..... had the knowledge, but, it was not intimated to the relevant authorities therefore, thereby accused no.2 had committed under section 19 and 21 of the pocso act.13. on going through the record placed by the prosecution, as well on hearing the arguments of both the side, it reveals that when complainant approached the ..... a legal obligation on a person to inform the uch information to the rel- relevant authorities, inter alia, when he/she has knowledge that an offence under the act had been committed. the expression used is "knowledge" which means that some information received by such a person gives him/ her knowledge about the commission of the crime .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2024 (HC)

S Nagarajan Production Assistant Dd India Vs. Nadoja Dr. Mahesh Joshi ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... complainant and the internal complaint 11 committee submitted a report stating that there was no such sexual harassment by the complainant to accused no.1. hence, it was held that act of accused no.3 itself is sufficient to hold that, he knowing fully well, though there is no such incident of sexual harassment to the accused no.1 by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2017 (HC)

Bharamappa S/O Parappa Savadi Vs. Akkatai W/O Satappa Rametterth

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF JANUARY2017BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR WRIT PETITION NO.109114/2016 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN SHRI BHARAMAPPA S/O PARAPPA SAVADI AGE:57. YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O TERDAL-587 315, TQ. JAMKHANDI DIST. BAGALKOT (BY SRI.M.G.NAGANURI, ADVOCATE) ... PETITIONER AND1 SMT.AKKATAI W/O SATAPPA RAMTEERTH AGE66YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD R/O HARUGERI-591 220 TALUKA: RAIBAG, DIST. BELAGAVI2 SRI.BAHUBALI S/O SATAPPA RAMTEERTH AGE35YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O HARUGERI-591 220 TALUKA RAIBAG, DIST. BELAGAVI3 SMT.CHINNAWA W/O SIDDAPPA GUBACHI AGE71YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD R/O NAGANUR-587 301 TQ. JAMKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT4 SRI.ALLAPPA BHUJABALI SAVADI AGE51YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O TERDAL-587 315 TQ.JAMKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT - 2 - 5. SRI.BHOOPAL BHUJABALI SAVADI AGE49YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O TERDAL-587 315 TQ. JAMKAHNDI, DIST. BAGALKOT6 SRI.DHANPAL BHUJABALI SAVADI AGE47YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O TERDAL-587 315 TQ. JAMKHANDI,...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 14 2021 (HC)

Bagalkot Town Development Authority Vs. Mallikarjun C. Charnatimath

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... doctrine of promissory estoppel where :11. : the allotment is not regulated by law can not be disputed; admittedly we have the 2004 rules promulgated under the 1976 act; the apex court in a catena of decisions has ruled that the property held by the state & its instrumentalities is always in public trust and therefore allotment of ..... for r1; shri g.k. hiregoudar, government advocate to r2 to r4) - - - - - - - - - this writ appeal is filed under section 4 of the karnataka high court act, 1961, praying this hon ble court to call for the records in w.p.no.110414/2019 and after examining the same; set aside the impugned order dated 17.07 ..... and for the following reasons: a) appellant is constituted as a statutory authority under the provisions of the karnataka improvements board act, 1976; it has statutory power to acquire and dispose of :6. : property under the act and rules made thereunder, is not in dispute; the bagalkot town development authority (allotment of industrial sites) rules, 2004 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2015 (HC)

Abdulla Siddiq S/O. Dr Farooq Vs. u.f.m.uday

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... .shantesh awage, learned counsel for the petitioners, has contended that the impugned order passed by the trial court is contrary to the provisions of article 58 of the limitation act, :4. :1963. when the suit was not filed within three years. hence, the suit was not maintainable. therefore, the trial court has passed the impugned order ..... the right to sue first accrues. hence, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, only article 65 applies and not article 58 of the limitation act.12. the trial court while passing the impugned order has specifically recorded a finding that the present suit filed by the plaintiff for declaration of title and consequential ..... by lrs]., reported in air2000sc1099 has held as under: 5. when possession has been taken by the appellants pursuant to void documents, article 65 of the limitation act will apply and the limitation to file the suit would be 12 years. when these documents are null and void, ignoring them a suit for possession simpliciter could .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 2017 (HC)

Anil S/O Vishwanath Manjanabail Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... others vs. the state of karnataka & anr. order dated 14th november 2014. the contention of the appellants that by this policy decision, the central rtfctlarr act, 2013 was made applicable to the present acquisition is absolutely misconceived and is liable to be rejected. by subordinate executive policy decision, like the government order ..... system, a company namely hubli dharwad bus rapid transport system (for short hdbrts ) was established by the karnataka state under the provisions of the companies act and to develop an eight lane road between these twin cities from unkal lake, hubballi to jubilee circle, dhrawad, to diffuse the severe traffic congestion and ..... , ksfc building rayapur, dharwad (by sri. c v angadi adv. for a1 & a2) ... accused this ccc is filed under sections11and12of the contempt of courts act, 1971, r/w. article215of the constitution of india, praying to initiate contempt proceedings against the accused nos.1 and2for having violated the interim orders dated2609.2016 vide .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2017 (HC)

Hasansab Allasab Pendari Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... of the naturally grown grass cannot be compared with the subservient activities carried out in that case and that is specifically excluded from the definition of cultivation under 1961 act. therefore, the said decision is clearly distinguishable on facts.22. in suresh s.rao and others vs. land tribunal, belgaum and others, 2007 (5) kar. ..... banakar vs. the land tribunal, dharwar & others, ilr1979kar156 a division bench of this court held that the definition of land in section 2(18) of the act of 1961 includes land used for a purpose subservient to agriculture and the definition of the word cultivate would include improving agricultural produce and it is not necessary that ..... as farmer. the applicant has admitted this factor that, there is no clear mention about payment of rents. as per section 2(10) of karnataka land reforms act, the expression cultivation of land is defined as under: to cultivate , with its grammatical variations and cognate expression means to till or husband the land for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 24 2013 (HC)

Altaf Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by Public Prosecutor

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... the test of cross-examination. however, pw1-hyder rahaman khan has not supported the case of the prosecution. in the circumstances, particularly that of pw3, pw7 and pw8 establishes overt acts of the petitioner in stealing gold ornaments from the neck of the complainant and with such evidence, it is difficult to hold petitioner is entitled to benefit of doubt. 9 ..... was a young boy when the crime was committed and therefore the provision of section 360, cr.p.c. be applied to grant him benefit of the probation of offenders act. it is difficult to accept the proposition advanced by the learned counsel or to be liberal. however, the sentence of imprisonment appears to be harsh. 12. in the result, while .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //