Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jan-31-2011
..... he is harassing the petitioner by filing false complaints and reports against her, and has recommended that she be transferred. it is also averred that respondent no.2 (director) has acted upon the reports submitted by respondent no.3, ignoring the settled principles of general transfer and, as a result, the petitioner has been transferred outside the district. by the order ..... the petitioner has stated that the affidavit of direct service has been filed in the registry. the record of the case shows that respondent no.3 has been served. such acts of omission and commission of respondent no.3 do raise certain questions.10. on the above facts and in the circumstances as detailed hereinabove, as the commissioner who has passed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Mar-04-2011
..... and the petitioner no.2 is the chairman of the said company.1. a search action came to be conducted under section 132 of the income tax act, 1962 (the act) on 8.9.2010, 9.9.2010 and 11.9.2010 on various companies of the neesa group. the proceedings covered around 20 locations/units of ..... record before the court clearly reveals that the petitioner has attempted to prevent axis private equity limited from furnishing the information requisitioned under section 133(6) of the act. it is, accordingly, submitted that the petitioner no.2 has been making various attempts to thwart further investigation, in respect of the financial transactions. it is ..... production of evidence, etc.(1) the assessing officer, deputy commissioner (appeals), joint commissioner, commissioner (appeals) and chief commissioner or commissioner shall, for the purposes of this act, have the same powers as are vested in a court under the code of civil procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), when trying a suit in respect of the following .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Feb-02-2011
1. The appellant-original complainant has preferred the present appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the Judgment and Order of acquittal dated 07^th September 1999 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jambusar, in Criminal Case No.970 of 1987, by which the learned Magistrate was pleased to acquit the opponent Nos.1 and 2-original accused from the charges levelled against them.2. The short facts of the complainant is that on 13^th April 1987 at about 08:00 hours the present appellant-original complainant along with his cousin, against whom complaint was lodged in the Jambusar Police Station, went to Jambusar Police Station to stand as a surety of his cousin. It is the case of the complainant-present appellant that the opponent No.1-original accused No.1 came in the police station at about 10:00 hours and started misbehaving with his cousin and also severely beat his cousin in present of the complainant-present appellant and therea...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Feb-04-2011
1. The petitioner is the complainant. He has challenged judgement of acquittal dated 30.9.2009 rendered by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Anand in Sessions Case No.30/2009. Respondents No. 1 to 6 are the original accused.2. Case of the prosecution was that aged mother of the complainant residing alone, was found dead in mysterious circumstances in the house. Accused who had previously quarrelled with the family of the complainant were therefore, prime suspects. Investigation was carried out and charge-sheet was filed against them. On the allegation that they had committed murder of the mother of the complainant, the Sessions case proceeded. After recording evidence, learned Additional Sessions Judge by impugned judgement acquitted all the accused finding no evidence of having committed the offences.3. Upon perusal of the judgement under consideration, though at first sight, it appears to be a rather short discussion of evidence on record, while going through record and...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jun-08-2011
..... amount to the satisfaction of the lower court and subject to the conditions that they shall: (1) not take undue advantage of their liberty or abuse their liberty; (2) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution; (3) maintain law and order; (4) accused-applicant nos.1 and 3 mark their presence before the concerned police station .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jun-08-2011
..... amount to the satisfaction of the lower court and subject to the conditions that they shall: (1) not take undue advantage of their liberty or abuse their liberty; (2) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution; (3) maintain law and order; (4) shall not enter valsad taluka till the completion of the trial; (5) not leave .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Oct-07-2011
Gujarat High Court Case Information System BODY {SCROLLBAR-FACE-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #808080; SCROLLBAR-SHADOW-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #ffffff; scrollbar-dark-shadow-color: #ffffff} SPAN.searchword { background-color:yellow; } function loadSearchHighlight() { var chkParamC = "txtSearch" if (chkParamC == "txtSearch") { SearchHighlight(); document.searchhi.h.value = searchhi_string; if( location.hash.length > 1 ) location.hash = location.hash; } } Print CR.MA/13127/20113/3ORDERINTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADCRIMINALMISC.APPLICATION No. 13127 of 2011=========================================================SUNIL@KALASONA LUNAJI - Applicant(s)VersusSTATEOF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)=========================================================Appearance:MRATIT D THAKORE forApplicant(s) : 1,MR LB DABHI, ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR forRespondent(s) :1,=========================================================CORAM:HONOURABLEMR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIDate: 0...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Oct-07-2011
Gujarat High Court Case Information System BODY {SCROLLBAR-FACE-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #808080; SCROLLBAR-SHADOW-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #ffffff; scrollbar-dark-shadow-color: #ffffff} SPAN.searchword { background-color:yellow; } function loadSearchHighlight() { var chkParamC = "txtSearch" if (chkParamC == "txtSearch") { SearchHighlight(); document.searchhi.h.value = searchhi_string; if( location.hash.length > 1 ) location.hash = location.hash; } } Print CR.MA/13572/20113/3ORDERINTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADCRIMINALMISC.APPLICATION No. 13572 of 2011=========================================VINUBHAIMANKABHAI RATHWA - Applicant(s)VersusSTATEOF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)=========================================Appearance :MS.KRUTI M SHAH for Applicant(s) : 1,MR KL PANDYA, LD. ADDL. PUBLICPROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) :1,=========================================CORAM: HONOURABLEMR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYEDDate: 07/10/2011ORALORDERByway of present appl...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Oct-07-2011
Gujarat High Court Case Information System BODY {SCROLLBAR-FACE-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #808080; SCROLLBAR-SHADOW-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #ffffff; scrollbar-dark-shadow-color: #ffffff} SPAN.searchword { background-color:yellow; } function loadSearchHighlight() { var chkParamC = "txtSearch" if (chkParamC == "txtSearch") { SearchHighlight(); document.searchhi.h.value = searchhi_string; if( location.hash.length > 1 ) location.hash = location.hash; } } Print CR.MA/12826/20113/3ORDERINTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADCRIMINALMISC.APPLICATION No. 12826 of 2011=========================================================HARISHARAN@UNCLE RAMCHARAN VARMA - Applicant(s)VersusSTATEOF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)=========================================================Appearance:MRJAGDHISH SATAPARA forApplicant(s) : 1,MR LB DABHI, ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR forRespondent(s) :1,=========================================================CORAM:HONOURABLEMR.JUSTICE AKIL ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Oct-07-2011
Gujarat High Court Case Information System BODY {SCROLLBAR-FACE-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #808080; SCROLLBAR-SHADOW-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #ffffff; scrollbar-dark-shadow-color: #ffffff} SPAN.searchword { background-color:yellow; } function loadSearchHighlight() { var chkParamC = "txtSearch" if (chkParamC == "txtSearch") { SearchHighlight(); document.searchhi.h.value = searchhi_string; if( location.hash.length > 1 ) location.hash = location.hash; } } Print CR.MA/12947/20116/6ORDERINTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADCRIMINALMISC.APPLICATION No. 12947 of 2011=========================================================HARISHARAN@UNCLE RAMCHANDRA VARMA - Applicant(s)VersusSTATEOF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)=========================================================Appearance:MRJAGDHISH SATAPARA forApplicant(s) : 1,MR LB DABHI, ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR forRespondent(s) :1,=========================================================CORAM:HONOURABLEMR.JUSTICE AKIL...
Tag this Judgment!